TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- ****the NHL playoff thread**** (really a "tiesto is coming" thread in disguise )
Pages (6): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »


Posted by The Ear on Apr-15-2008 02:21:

indeed... 3 & 0 with one to go. Then the Sens miserable season can go back to the behind-closed-doors drama and we don't have to watch it anymore.


Posted by yankeeBaby on Apr-15-2008 02:43:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
This is clearly a misconduct penalty as defined by the NHL Rules.



NHL Rules


If it is already IN the rules, then why all the fuss to make a NEW rule based on avery's actions?

Edit: besides, the rules are more clearly defined now such that this statement was drawn up based on avery's actions:

"An unsportsmanlike conduct minor penalty will be interpreted and applied, effective immediately, to a situation when an offensive player positions himself facing the opposition goaltender and engages in actions such as waving his arms or stick in front of the goaltender's face, for the purpose of improperly interfering with and/or distracting the goaltender as opposed to positioning himself to try to make a play,"


This action was not specifically in the rule book, and even if avery was being an ASS if you listen to many professional opinions (its all over the media)...avery technically did not break any rules, because the specific action is not in writing. now, if you feel like the ref could have INTERPRETED the original rules to align with avery's action, thats on the ref to make the call. But according to the professionals, avery was simply being an asshole, and nothing further. (until today, in which the specific action can no longer take place without penalty.)


Posted by pete242 on Apr-15-2008 03:03:

quote:
Originally posted by yankeeBaby
If it is already IN the rules, then why all the fuss to make a NEW rule based on avery's actions?

Edit: besides, the rules are more clearly defined now such that this statement was drawn up based on avery's actions:

"An unsportsmanlike conduct minor penalty will be interpreted and applied, effective immediately, to a situation when an offensive player positions himself facing the opposition goaltender and engages in actions such as waving his arms or stick in front of the goaltender's face, for the purpose of improperly interfering with and/or distracting the goaltender as opposed to positioning himself to try to make a play,"


This action was not specifically in the rule book, and even if avery was being an ASS if you listen to many professional opinions (its all over the media)...avery technically did not break any rules, because the specific action is not in writing. now, if you feel like the ref could have INTERPRETED the original rules to align with avery's action, thats on the ref to make the call. But according to the professionals, avery was simply being an asshole, and nothing further. (until today, in which the specific action can no longer take place without penalty.)


what Avery was doing there was so stupid! even his own teammates thought it was stupid! glad that became a rule, penalize his ass. Though I have voted NYR in 6

I don't wanna hijack the thread but I also run a playoff pool along with a blog every year since 2001. The site is called http://www.springtimeshowdown.com

People are welcome to visit and comment on the blogs there as well. Lotsa fun.


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-15-2008 03:20:

quote:
Originally posted by teufel-man
BTW who was watching the part of the Devils/Rangers game where they were all roughing each other up after the whistle and the mic happened to be right above them and you could clearly see/hear the one guy go to the other guy "you're a fucking pussy" and "your a fucking bitch"

that was halirous!







hahahahahahaha CLASSIC.


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-15-2008 03:22:

quote:
Originally posted by yankeeBaby
If it is already IN the rules, then why all the fuss to make a NEW rule based on avery's actions?



Avery could pull his pants down and piss on Brodeur if he wants, that's not in the rulebook... But there's a certain standard of play you keep when playing in the NHL... I'm glad they reacted so quickly in making a rule, and don't worry, I still love you, my Ranger friend.


Posted by yankeeBaby on Apr-15-2008 03:23:

I was waiting for your ass to pop up in here, devils fan!!





(Eco and I hate each other this time of year.....in a few weeks we will grab a drink or ten and make up until october..........)


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-15-2008 03:25:

quote:
Originally posted by yankeeBaby
I was waiting for your ass to pop up in here, devils fan!!



I actually came in here to see if I could find the much talked-about video of the "300" parody from the Sens game haha... But I just found it somewhere, and I must say, it's quite entertaining...


Posted by yankeeBaby on Apr-15-2008 03:26:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Avery could pull his pants down and piss on Brodeur if he wants, that's not in the rulebook... But there's a certain standard of play you keep when playing in the NHL... I'm glad they reacted so quickly in making a rule, and don't worry, I still love you, my Ranger friend.


true, but thats an extreme measure. I think avery's actions were difficult to interpret by the ref's because it NOT in the rule book. There wouldnt be such a rush to MAKE a rule if there wasnt room to wiggle in terms of interpretation. The league obviously thought it was an asshole move and wanted to make sure it didnt become a trend. Fine by me, because I would be infuriated if some dude did that shit to lundqvist. haha no one needs to convince ME that avery is an asshole But to compare pissing and waving a stick is two different things. I could see avery doing both, tho. lol!!


Posted by teufel-man on Apr-15-2008 04:37:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco



hahahahahahaha CLASSIC.


hahaha sweet! I was looking for that! thanks!


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Apr-15-2008 12:40:

quote:
Originally posted by yankeeBaby
If it is already IN the rules, then why all the fuss to make a NEW rule based on avery's actions?

Edit: besides, the rules are more clearly defined now such that this statement was drawn up based on avery's actions:

"An unsportsmanlike conduct minor penalty will be interpreted and applied, effective immediately, to a situation when an offensive player positions himself facing the opposition goaltender and engages in actions such as waving his arms or stick in front of the goaltender's face, for the purpose of improperly interfering with and/or distracting the goaltender as opposed to positioning himself to try to make a play,"


This action was not specifically in the rule book, and even if avery was being an ASS if you listen to many professional opinions (its all over the media)...avery technically did not break any rules, because the specific action is not in writing. now, if you feel like the ref could have INTERPRETED the original rules to align with avery's action, thats on the ref to make the call. But according to the professionals, avery was simply being an asshole, and nothing further. (until today, in which the specific action can no longer take place without penalty.)


he didn't break a rule that provided a penalty to the team. He did break a rule that would give him a 10 min. misconduct penalty. The 10 min. penalty wouldn't put the team down a man. The new interpretation of the rules would now put the team down a man.


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-15-2008 16:36:

quote:
Originally posted by yankeeBaby
true, but thats an extreme measure. I think avery's actions were difficult to interpret by the ref's because it NOT in the rule book. There wouldnt be such a rush to MAKE a rule if there wasnt room to wiggle in terms of interpretation. The league obviously thought it was an asshole move and wanted to make sure it didnt become a trend. Fine by me, because I would be infuriated if some dude did that shit to lundqvist. haha no one needs to convince ME that avery is an asshole But to compare pissing and waving a stick is two different things. I could see avery doing both, tho. lol!!



haha Yeah... In my opinion, they did the right thing, the refs, in not calling it... I just think one of the Devs should have layed him out for that one... If Stevens were still playing, he woulda But yeah, not calling it (since it's not a "penalty") was a smart move... Otherwise all the ass-hat Ranger fans (not you, since you at least have knowledge of the game and a view besides "Rangers rule, Devils suck") woulda been claiming an unfair match and too many calls for the Devils... lol...


Posted by Spin Laden on Apr-15-2008 22:35:

Sean Avery also whipped out his stick and waived it in front of one of the Olsen twins too. He shot and scored.... between the legs even

You'll see lots of players try and bend the rules; it's high stakes time, and it'll only get worse, imo. Avery gets points for trying to find an edge, kind of like Roger Neilson used to do in his coaching days. But with Sean Avery being Sean Avery he is under the microscope enough as it.


Posted by Spin Laden on Apr-15-2008 22:44:


Posted by Abercrombie on Apr-16-2008 01:23:

slow game IMO.... 3min to another habs win


Posted by teufel-man on Apr-16-2008 01:30:

dammit!


Posted by elFreak on Apr-16-2008 03:35:

JESUS PRICE


Posted by Owen M on Apr-16-2008 03:41:

fuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhkkkkkk!!!!

can't someone else update the first post?!?!?!
I still haven't changed from the first ights of games.

lol.

I missed all the games on t.v. today and tomorrow working evenings.


Posted by smuncky on Apr-17-2008 01:38:

see ya sens


Posted by exstasie on Apr-17-2008 01:47:

quote:
Originally posted by smuncky
see ya sens


WOOHOO!!

BYE BYE SENS

Have fun on the golf course!



Posted by Abercrombie on Apr-17-2008 03:46:

The classic leafs pic, reworked


Posted by yankeeBaby on Apr-17-2008 18:14:

Rangers owned last night.


Posted by malek on Apr-17-2008 18:18:

hopefully they'll take care of the pits


Posted by Yohan on Apr-17-2008 18:32:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
hopefully they'll take care of the pits

As sucky the Sens were (let's collectively laugh at the Sens for getting sweeped!), Pens look pretty damn sharp.

Price will have to be on top of his game.

Lucky for Habs, the Pens defence is leaky at times...


Posted by malek on Apr-17-2008 18:38:

we won't play against the pits in the second round, its impossible,... we have to focus on either Flyers, the Rangers or the Devils.


Posted by yankeeBaby on Apr-17-2008 19:09:

damn I really hope we dont have to play pittsburg. Dont think we will look good against that team.

*gotta win against NJ first, I am getting ahead of myself*


Pages (6): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.