evolution and the soul - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- evolution and the soul
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Dec-06-2008 04:05:

Re: Re: evolution and the soul

quote:
Originally posted by Saka
If religion isn't in this thread then why are we talking about souls?

i didn't say religion wasn't in this thread, i simply stated that i wasnt trying to bash religion, considering in many of my threads thats exactly what im trying to do.

quote:
Originally posted by Saka
And evolution isn't irrefutable.
That's why it is the 'theory' of evolution.

if you really mean this:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
A theory has to be potentially "refutable" in order to be scientific. Once you make predictions about contingent events, which is what science does, you open up the possibility that your theory could be refuted if things turn out differently than you expect.

then i would agree. but if you meant something else, you're talking out of your ass.

Posted by RJT on Dec-06-2008 04:11:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: evolution and the soul

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
I basically feel the same way, except I don't feel that the 'atom' is anything but a perceived phemonenon.

I believe there is no difference between the 'spirit' and 'matter'. This quote from Inayat Khan summarizes:

I should be clear that when I use the term "atomism" I'm not talking about the scientific definition of an atom, but rather the idea of something that is irreducible - whatever that may be.

In that sense I think we're very much on the same page in the sense that whatever you call it, "spirit", "atom", etc.

I find myself very much inspired by the works of Lucretius, a philosopher often glossed over as simply one of the "Pre-Socratics" - but whose ideas (IMO) are far more developed than much of academia give him credit for, or maybe rather than "more developed", at least more clear in their simplicity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucretius

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Nature_of_Things

Posted by winston on Dec-06-2008 05:34:

I thought it'd be nice to post in here seeing that I do share alot of similiarities with a few of you. I am currently sheltered under the stoic school of thought established by zeno. In my opinion, our soul, our entity & beign can be analyzed under a mathematical lense (which leads to more complicated theories of metaphysics), that which might not be all that suitable to dwell in this thread. I believe in being one with nature, I believe all things- good & evil are rooted from the same nature or force that we evolved from, good and evil are natural to all living beigns & they all carry divinity, even if on the outside they might come off as unattractive or unappealing. I believe that a soul can grow if it is fed upon by living our lives based on virtues, not pleasure.

Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]