TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Smoking ban just won't quit - Parks and Playgrounds next!!
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-10-2009 23:15:

quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
As a non-smoker and a person who hates second hand smoke I say bring it on


Until they ban something that other people hate and that you like to do, of course.


Posted by love_child on Jan-10-2009 23:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Until they ban something that other people hate and that you like to do, of course.


Ah so this is what its about then huh lol


Posted by Xavier Moriarty on Jan-10-2009 23:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Inrush
but why do i have to hold my breath. its my choice to breath. This is just going to go on and on. there is no right answer.


yeah but its my choice and my right to smoke. if its that bad how come smokes arent illegal??

cant smoke in the bar, in the club, in my car....now outside?? i would say its time to ban smokes, right??

nope. way too much money goes in their pockets.

quote:
Once a friend of mine was smoking in an underground garage. Some guy drives up to him, opens the window and asks him to stop smoking. He says "are you some sort of security or a cop?" He says "No i just dont like breathing your smoke." He says "tell you what, you stop emitting your carcinogenic car fumes and forcing me to breathe them in here, and ill put out my smoke"


somebody does that to me will be punched in the mouth. when i smoke in the bar or in the club and somebody tells me to put it out, i obey because i have to. anybody tells me to put it out while im smoking outside is getting punched right in the fucking mouth.

oh yeah, 3rd hand smoke kills too. cant wait for the day when they discover 11th hand smoke and still sell them


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-11-2009 00:10:

quote:
Originally posted by love_child
Ah so this is what its about then huh lol


Jay doesn't smoke....so I guess the laugh is on you


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-11-2009 02:57:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
Jay doesn't smoke....so I guess the laugh is on you


But i do like clubs and parties and i see the same type of biased argument and political misrepresentation against nightclubs as i do when it comes to issues like smoking. And it usually comes from the same group of people too.


Posted by DigiNut on Jan-11-2009 03:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Inrush
I guess its different when you know someone that has been directly affected by second hand smoke

I used to be on your side of the fence, but eventually I sucked it up and actually read the second-hand smoke studies and realized that the evidence for casual inhalation of second-hand causing permanent health problems was virtually nonexistent.

If you live with a heavy smoker then it will have an effect. If you spend several hours a day with smokers (i.e. work with them) then it might have an effect. A few minutes a day or a couple of hours a week though... highly unlikely. And outdoors, in a park, it's just absurd. The actual amount of SHS anyone will breathe in is minuscule, and even if you assumed that some kid was getting direct exposure to SHS for every minute spent in a park, it's just not enough time to cause complications.

There were good arguments for banning smoking in offices, and OK arguments for bars and clubs that I agreed with at the time, but this time there's no valid health argument, it's totally agenda driven.


Posted by love_child on Jan-11-2009 03:44:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
I used to be on your side of the fence, but eventually I sucked it up and actually read the second-hand smoke studies and realized that the evidence for casual inhalation of second-hand causing permanent health problems was virtually nonexistent.

If you live with a heavy smoker then it will have an effect. If you spend several hours a day with smokers (i.e. work with them) then it might have an effect. A few minutes a day or a couple of hours a week though... highly unlikely. And outdoors, in a park, it's just absurd. The actual amount of SHS anyone will breathe in is minuscule, and even if you assumed that some kid was getting direct exposure to SHS for every minute spent in a park, it's just not enough time to cause complications.

There were good arguments for banning smoking in offices, and OK arguments for bars and clubs that I agreed with at the time, but this time there's no valid health argument, it's totally agenda driven.


Very well said


Posted by DaRoZa on Jan-11-2009 06:24:

as a person who's never smoked, i always appreciated the laws against smoking indoors.. but this is ridiculous. what harm is one second of cig smoke smell in passing by outdoors? you probably encounter more carcinogens walking by someone spraying deodorant.. and if some guy in a big blue van is driving in suburbs exhaling smoke in kids' faces, i don't think this law will deter him

trying to scold a huge fraction of the population for something they most often do responsibly and at their own risk, along with things like censoring advertisements in stores .. a whole bunch of wack precedents set for the future, all in name of the crusade against smoking.


Posted by Sentinal on Jan-11-2009 07:28:

I havent touched a cigarette in well over a year now but I still think that this law is going well over the top. IT IS OUTDOORS! I agree 100% with Jay on this one and the socialist Toronto municipal government really should be focusing on infrastructure and assisting in creating jobs, but nope, lets ban smoking within 30 feet of city parks....a law that can and will never be enforced. If I was still a smoker and I was outside and someone asked me to put out my cigarette I would have not hesitation I telling them to shut right the fuck up. There is my 2 cents.


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-11-2009 17:16:

Everyone, PLEASE MAKE AN INFORMED VOTE IN CITY ELECTIONS IN 2010! These idiots have got to go... every single last one of them.


Posted by Inrush on Jan-11-2009 17:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Everyone, PLEASE MAKE AN INFORMED VOTE IN CITY ELECTIONS IN 2010! These idiots have got to go... every single last one of them.


i vote only jayx1 in.


Posted by Sorin.16v on Jan-11-2009 22:33:

I would love to see them enforce that law on me.


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-12-2009 15:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Sorin.16v
I would love to see them enforce that law on me.


make sure you have lots of cash to pay the fine then. As this as well as vote getting is the true agenda of these sorts of laws.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-12-2009 15:24:

Re: Re: Re: Smoking ban just won't quit - Parks and Playgrounds next!!

quote:
Originally posted by devnull
+1

im all for the ban!
i am still waiting on the day cigarettes will be banned outright


That's exactly how I feel about alcohol.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-12-2009 15:26:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Smoking ban just won't quit - Parks and Playgrounds next!!

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
That's exactly how I feel about alcohol.


and that's exactly how I feel about vocal trance.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-12-2009 15:28:

I'd like to see the study that confirms smoking within 30 feet of children outdoors is hazardous to their health. Until those behind this bi law produce that study then I can see this as nothing more then another attempt for politicians to appear as though they are doing something while in effect doing nothing.


Posted by djeso on Jan-12-2009 15:40:

I don't think it's a health hazard, and I doubt anyone will obey this law, however I tend to see one good aspect to it, atleast kids won't be exposed to watching adults smoke, hence lowering the chances of a child becoming a smoker .... just a thought


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-12-2009 15:44:

quote:
Originally posted by djeso
I don't think it's a health hazard, and I doubt anyone will obey this law, however I tend to see one good aspect to it, atleast kids won't be exposed to watching adults smoke, hence lowering the chances of a child becoming a smoker .... just a thought


Kids are still going to see adults smoke. I highly doubt a 5-10 year old seeing an adult smoke, while they are at the park, is going to make them smoke. I would be more concerned about the grade 9 kids seeing the grade 12 kids smoking at school as a cause for them to start smoking.


Posted by djeso on Jan-12-2009 15:59:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
Kids are still going to see adults smoke. I highly doubt a 5-10 year old seeing an adult smoke, while they are at the park, is going to make them smoke. I would be more concerned about the grade 9 kids seeing the grade 12 kids smoking at school as a cause for them to start smoking.


no argument there, it would be minimal .... just looking at the positive things of life


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-12-2009 17:10:

quote:
Originally posted by djeso
I don't think it's a health hazard, and I doubt anyone will obey this law, however I tend to see one good aspect to it, atleast kids won't be exposed to watching adults smoke, hence lowering the chances of a child becoming a smoker .... just a thought


Watching my parents smoke is exactly what convinced me NOT to smoke!

Go figure


Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.