9/11 style fire in beijing, but building still standing.

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- 9/11 style fire in beijing, but building still standing.
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Posted by Krypton on Feb-14-2009 03:03:

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Reading comprehension? you just posted up the NIST paper like it is you're bible.

Care to explain if you actually did read it?

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/.../wtc082108.html

The NIST report is based on SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY...key word "science". Do you know what science is? WTF do you have? Unsupported conspiracy bullshit from Alex Jones?

Determining the probable collapse sequence for WTC 7, NIST found that the impact of debris from the collapse of WTC 1 ignited fires on at least 10 floors of WTC 7, and the fires burned out of control on six lower floors. The heat from these uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors. Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical interior column that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building. The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the fifth floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of the critical column. This collapse of floors left the critical column unsupported over nine stories.

It's self-explanatory. You want me to spoon feed you?

Posted by culorut on Feb-14-2009 03:05:

Nothing to say about the NIST report you just held up so high?

Posted by culorut on Feb-14-2009 03:09:

quote:
Never forget a building hit that building.

Which story are you going to stick with? The imaginary one you make up as you type or NIST's fairy tale?

Pick one already...

Thermal expansion, LOL.

Posted by Lira on Feb-14-2009 03:15:

quote:
Culorut, double/triple post just once again, and this thread will be automatically closed.

This was not a deliberate measure, but comes to show how much attention you conspiracy theorists pay to what we're trying to tell you. Seriously, let 9/11 go already!

This is why we can't have conspiracy theories...

Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]