TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- compressor on the master channel?
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

Yea at least it's one that has the credentials/portfolio to talk whatever shit he wants . I don't see why people don't seem to get it. It's up to you what to do, it doesn't matter what you do as long as the outcome sounds good.

watched an ingrosso FM interview, he said he used a compressor on the master the whole time, to know "mix as he went" so to speak, saying that it saves doing it twice...

what storyteller said. probably not a good idea, but the craziest shit works for some people.. just needa see what works for you..

quote:

Originally posted by Existo22 ''That Guy'' Is Olav Basoski. He is a very good producer. Period.

never heard of him? What's he produced? Point me to samples?

Oh come on, why don't you search? it's not that hard.

https://www.beatport.com/en-US/html...49/olav_basoski

http://www.discogs.com/artist/Olav+Basoski

He's pretty much into the groove/house/club music.
I've got some old trance records from him too. That's from somewhere in the 90's though .

well I hadn't heard the name so assumed he must be somones ghost producer, or engineer or something.

quote:

Originally posted by kitphillips well I hadn't heard the name so assumed he must be somones ghost producer, or engineer or something.

since you know every producer in the world?

quote:

Originally posted by EgosXII since you know every producer in the world?

Is the discussion about every producer in the world, or the most accomplished/ well-known ones?

I thought this Olav Basoski guy was supposed to be good, not an unknown producer who falls into the category of "every producer in the world".

quote:

Originally posted by Eric J Yeah, it's really cool. I'm actually quite surprised that I've never seen anyone else try it this way. Let me know if you have questions, I can give you the exact technical specs if you want to attempt to do something like this yourself.

Sounds interesting mate could I have the spec's?

quote:

Originally posted by music2dance2 Sounds interesting mate could I have the spec's?

Send me a PM, and I'll describe it there. We can keep this thread uncluttered that way.

quote:

Originally posted by Eric J Send me a PM, and I'll describe it there. We can keep this thread uncluttered that way.

telling secrets behind our backs on PM? no post it here. this thread is so random anyway.

quote:

Originally posted by palm telling secrets behind our backs on PM? no post it here. this thread is so random anyway.

Actually - start a new thread! It might help sine other peeps too...

As requested, I have started a new thread.

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...0&forumid=48&s=

quote:

Originally posted by Existo22 ''That Guy'' Is Olav Basoski. He is a very good producer. Period.

I'm sure he makes some nice tunes, but any "mainstream" producer who (judging from the video) hasn't got the slightest idea about what the loudness war is and probably has no idea how a limiter/compressor works, deserves to be publicly ridiculed.

I watched that shit, because I wanted to learn more about mixing specifically for EDM music, learn some new tricks etc... What this guy did is the opposite of everything I learned to that point and just left me confused and in need to find correct information.

This is how a video like this should be made: http://www.steinberg.net/en/product...ngtutorial.html

There's not a thing in audio this guy doesn't know inside out and everything is well explained. But it's not oriented towards dance producers. Watch this solely for what he says about the effects chain on the master bus.

Back on topic, there seems to be a lot of confusion about why to mix close to 0DB and it struck me most people on here probably don;t understand what "0db" actually is, so I'm going to start a thread....

DEFINATELY NO specially if you plan to master your song. On the master channel you shouldn't have anyhing that alters the sound signal. You can have an osciloscope or any other frequency analyzer that shows you what frequencies are playing in the song or that helps you visualise the song better but nothing that affects the sound signal

quote:

On the master channel you shouldn't have anyhing that alters the sound signal

There are no rules. You can have whatever you want on the master channel if you know exactly what you want to achieve. As i said before, read up on "mixing into a compressor". Follow the earlier links. It is a VERY widely used technique and your information is misleading.

Adding compressor on the 2-bus is actually pretty common, the whole idea is to keep the mix glued together a little smoother. It's not meant to totally remove transients. The main reason it's used is also to get the sound out of a nice 2-bus compressor (api 2500, Fatso, Smart Research C2).Fast release, with just around -2db of reduction.

It really depends on the tune. If you've done a shit load of Sub-grouped compression, it's probably already pretty smoothed out.

But save the real meat and limiting for the mastering.

quote:

Originally posted by vikernes I'm sorry, but I will have to call bullshit on that guy. It's a personal preference to mix against a compressor I guess, not something you advise people to do through a "tutorial video". Half way into mixing he changed the threshold and the ratio (I think) on the compressor (on the master bus), because he didn't like the sound. No shit. That's the reason you don't put a compressor there at the mixing stage. So after he did that, the levels on the tracks got screwed up. No shit #2. Again, I have no problem if some people do it that way, it's just that I've never heard someone do that before I saw him and I thought this is somewhat of a "standard" in EDM. Also, I think that guy is clueless. At one point in the video he's talking about the loudness wars and then goes to say something like - and I0'm not shitting you -> "I don't know why people want their mixes so loud. If a track isn't loud enough you just turn up the gain on the mixer, that's why it's there." I'm not kidding you, I even think this is the exact quote he says. After I heard that I just scrolled through the video quickly just to end it. Also he had clipping on almost every track in his mix. He did say something like how he doesn't care about "looking" at music, rather hearing it. So he says if he doesn't hear the signal getting clipped he doesn't bother lowering the volume. Which I guess isn't such a bad idea since every trance track I checked clips at least 10 times through the track - and I'm talking the likes of Tiesto, Armin etc... But he had levels peaking at something like 2.7db on the master or something most of the time. Even if you don't hear it, that might cause problems later (at least) at the mastering stage. So a followup; I also get some clipping on the master in my tracks - mostly only when the kick hits in - and I'm not talking 2.7db here. As I said, I checked a lot of tracks from professional DJs/producers and almost every track has clipping in it. So should I worry about this if I can't hear it or just leave it? AFAIK there should never be clipping on individual tracks, but it's kinda OK on the master? That's what I heard...

so what if channels clip? u have 32bit floating point internal processing bitdepth whats the problem? if your master clips but it sounds exactly like you want it to... lower the fucking volume on the master. Duh?

Its ok on the master? No, clipping is NOT ok on the master.. lol thats where its absolutely not ok... U say u checked a lot of tracks from professional DJs/producers and almost every track has clipping in it? I assume u checked mp3 files for the most part? U are aware the soundwaves of a track will be altered when u convert it to mp3 etc, unless you really know how to do the conversion without chance of introducing inter-sample clipping? Thats probably why u saw clipping in so many tracks. Because u checked mp3 files.

For god sakes. If it sounds right it is right even if your master clips a 100dB. Nobody cares as long as it sounds good.

quote:

Originally posted by Storyteller For god sakes. If it sounds right it is right even if your master clips a 100dB. Nobody cares as long as it sounds good.

Agreed mate. More often than not, clipping does not sound good though.

quote:

Originally posted by Storyteller For god sakes. If it sounds right it is right even if your master clips a 100dB. Nobody cares as long as it sounds good.

No track will sound good if the master is clipping at 100 dB.

what do u mean master clip at 100dB???

quote:

Originally posted by palm what do u mean master clip at 100dB???

lol he just exaggerated to prove a point..

and he didnt say at.. he said a. ^^

quote:

Originally posted by lenieNt Force so what if channels clip? u have 32bit floating point internal processing bitdepth whats the problem? if your master clips but it sounds exactly like you want it to... lower the fucking volume on the master. Duh? Its ok on the master? No, clipping is NOT ok on the master.. lol thats where its absolutely not ok... U say u checked a lot of tracks from professional DJs/producers and almost every track has clipping in it? I assume u checked mp3 files for the most part? U are aware the soundwaves of a track will be altered when u convert it to mp3 etc, unless you really know how to do the conversion without chance of introducing inter-sample clipping? Thats probably why u saw clipping in so many tracks. Because u checked mp3 files.

You're right and you're wrong, but this whole topic is so overdone now.

For the last time, clipping is never good on individual tracks simply because the clipping is actually distortion, unless that is what you're going for. Turn that track down if it's clipping. If you loose that track because you had to turn it down then compress it and make up the gain. It 'aint that difficult.

You computer might well be operating at 32bit floating point but that's not going to help you at all when you're DAW is running at 16 or 24 bit.

Yes you can turn down the master but that means you're losing overall dynamic range, and also there's no need to turn down the master if you just balance your tracks properly - any mix engineer will tell you that.

...But I also agree that if it sounds right it doesn't matter that a track clips a few times in a 5 minute song. Close you're eyes and if you can't tell it's clipping then don;t worry about it.

quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN You computer might well be operating at 32bit floating point but that's not going to help you at all when you're DAW is running at 16 or 24 bit.

Tell me.. What DAW are you using?

quote:

Yes you can turn down the master but that means you're losing overall dynamic range

32 bit floating point has a dynamic range around 1500 dB. The threshold for pain is 130 dB. Hearing loss and trauma occurs at 160 dB. Even 24 bit has a dynamic range of 140 dB..

The massive headroom of 32 bit floating point is what enables you to pile on tracks, and lower the master fader when the summed signal cannot be represented anymore by the INTEGER bits of your sound card. Lowering the master fader is changing the scaling value as the floating point values are converted to integer bits for the audio card. You lose virtually no dynamic range mate.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.