TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Small earth is SMALL!!!
Pages (6): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »


Posted by noikeee on Sep-02-2009 17:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I wouldn't be surprised if the first "alien" ever found turned out to be bacteria.


I thought they had already found bacteria in Mars?


Posted by stren on Sep-02-2009 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
No it wouldn't. I agree that there probably is life out there right now but are they advanced as us, or more? Very small chance of that. It's hard to come by conditions that are ripe for life like on Earth. Then there's the chances that they developed at the same time as us and are equally intelligent as us.

Very small ? i wouldn't say that. Life on earth is pretty young compared to the age of the universe. With such a large number of stars and solar systems there are bound to be planets able to support life in many of them. Hell, even our solar system had 2 planets able to support it (Mars being the second one).
Chances are there are less intelligent and more intelligent life forms out there.


Posted by Sunsnail on Sep-02-2009 19:18:

Isn't the sun and the solar systems the product of a previous star's supernova or such? So we're not even first generation


Posted by Acton on Sep-02-2009 19:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
Isn't the sun and the solar systems the product of a previous star's supernova or such? So we're not even first generation


Kind of, yeah.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-02-2009 19:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Acton
Kind of, yeah.


neat


Posted by jupiterone on Sep-02-2009 19:44:

i wonder if other life forms listen to trance


Posted by stren on Sep-02-2009 19:53:

quote:
Originally posted by jupiterone
i wonder if other life forms listen to trance


not if they are more intelligent then us


Posted by Acton on Sep-02-2009 20:11:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
not if they are more intelligent then us


What about the Prawns? They must love trance.


Posted by meriter on Sep-02-2009 22:35:

Flower of Life




Posted by iTranscendence on Sep-02-2009 23:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
Isn't the sun and the solar systems the product of a previous star's supernova or such? So we're not even first generation


Essentially yes, a supernova shock wave pushed enough nebulous material together to form our solar system.


Posted by Lomeli on Sep-02-2009 23:08:

I would love to observe myself in the realm of the sub-atomic.


Posted by Acton on Sep-02-2009 23:45:

quote:
Originally posted by iTranscendence
a supernova shock wave pushed enough nebulous material together to form our solar system.


No.


Posted by astroboy on Sep-02-2009 23:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Acton
No.


Pudding.


Posted by iTranscendence on Sep-02-2009 23:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Acton
No.


Yes, it was on NGC not even a week ago, kthnx.


Posted by Acton on Sep-03-2009 00:17:

quote:
Originally posted by iTranscendence
Yes, it was on NGC not even a week ago, kthnx.


Well what you said is wrong.

Supernova explosions would scatter material away from where it was formed, and then GRAVITY would pull the material together, not a "supernova shock wave".


Posted by iTranscendence on Sep-03-2009 00:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Acton
Well what you said is wrong.

Supernova explosions would scatter material away from where it was formed, and then GRAVITY would pull the material together, not a "supernova shock wave".


May be you are misunderstanding what I said. There was already nebulous material at a great distance from the supernova and the blast wave pushed the material close enough together to jump start our sun. Please don't argue semantics with me, if you don't believe me I don't really give a shit.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-03-2009 04:04:

quote:
Originally posted by iTranscendence
May be you are misunderstanding what I said. There was already nebulous material at a great distance from the supernova and the blast wave pushed the material close enough together to jump start our sun. Please don't argue semantics with me, if you don't believe me I don't really give a shit.


all this sounds fascinating.. I always wanted to know how do they actually figure out how wide and far away planets or stars are with just a telescope?
wouldnt you lose depth perception when your looking at something so far away. what is the frame of reference?

Im not very knowledged in this subject so maybe someone could explain it in basic terms.


Posted by iTranscendence on Sep-03-2009 04:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
all this sounds fascinating.. I always wanted to know how do they actually figure out how wide and far away planets or stars are with just a telescope?
wouldnt you lose depth perception when your looking at something so far away. what is the frame of reference?

Im not very knowledged in this subject so maybe someone could explain it in basic terms.


Red shift and quasars.


Posted by miamitrance04 on Sep-03-2009 04:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
What, so you can play Playstation, drink beer and watch hockey on a spaceship as it hurtles towards some distant planet? I can just see it now; your girlfriend at the window and you saying "I'll come and look later..."

Also, I think this short story is highly relevant to this thread, and everyone should read it. It just proves why Isaac Asimov is one of the greatest science-fiction writers ever.

http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html


cool read. any more suggestions?


Posted by Acton on Sep-03-2009 07:04:

quote:
Originally posted by iTranscendence
May be you are misunderstanding what I said. There was already nebulous material at a great distance from the supernova and the blast wave pushed the material close enough together to jump start our sun. Please don't argue semantics with me, if you don't believe me I don't really give a shit.


Oh but I will argue the semantics with you.

Now you have put it like that, yeah supernova blasts could push material closer together. But still, gravity is responsible for the creation of the sun and solar system. If anything, the blast would have only helped initial conditions.


Posted by iTranscendence on Sep-03-2009 07:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Acton
Oh but I will argue the semantics with you.

Now you have put it like that, yeah supernova blasts could push material closer together. But still, gravity is responsible for the creation of the sun and solar system. If anything, the blast would have only helped initial conditions.


That's exactly what I meant I just didn't elaborate on it. I figure e=mc� doesn't really need explaning, but thank you for clarifying it for anyone who just tuned in from american idol.


Posted by Fledz on Sep-03-2009 10:09:

quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
I thought they had already found bacteria in Mars?

Negative.


Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-03-2009 10:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Negative.


Yes, actually, they have.

It's just a world-government conspiracy covering it all up, mostly due to pressure from the Vatican.

You're so naive.


Posted by Fledz on Sep-03-2009 10:32:

Well I am a 16 year old ginger from NZ.


Posted by PSi on Sep-03-2009 19:07:

amazing - thanks for that.


Pages (6): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.