TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Wolf + Lamb Podcast
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »


Posted by djhaziel on Dec-06-2009 21:43:

listening to gadhi's podcast #90

regardless if on some transitions he fucked up he bought me with " el bandido " , " wicked game " and " slow hands" this stuff is good


Posted by idoru on Dec-07-2009 00:47:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�
... here's something to cream your pants to. merry xmas woscarclovisbasidoru and anyone else who likes to stay awake for 48 hours surviving on merlot, blow, and techno...


Just for the record, I hate wine and have never done blow. A+ for effort, though. Keep on trying.


Posted by JPlay on Dec-07-2009 04:25:

stevo, not sure what the problem is with being a hipster...?

i don't shop at vintage stores in the village, don't wear skinny jeans and retro clothes, don't listen to indie music (although some of it is good), don't live in brooklyn, don't drink wine regularly, although when i do i thoroughly enjoy it, don't do blow (although i didn't know that was a hipster stereotype) honestly most of them are so broke they can't afford it.

having said that, i fucking love wolf + lamb's releases and fully support them as well as labels like crosstown rebels.

i have a LOT of friends living in Williamsburg, park slope and the area and i guess they may come across as elitist pricks but i can assure you that after 5 minutes of talking to them you will realize your perception is completely biased by common wisdom. in any case, the parties in brooklyn are becoming more and more commercialized that it's not really hip anymore so don't worry, your wishes are coming to reality.


Posted by woscar on Dec-07-2009 04:40:

JPlay, FYI you're explaining yourself to someone who once said that wiimotes were the future of deejaying.


Posted by stev� on Dec-07-2009 15:33:

quote:
Originally posted by JPlay
stevo, not sure what the problem is with being a hipster...?

i don't shop at vintage stores in the village, don't wear skinny jeans and retro clothes, don't listen to indie music (although some of it is good), don't live in brooklyn, don't drink wine regularly, although when i do i thoroughly enjoy it, don't do blow (although i didn't know that was a hipster stereotype) honestly most of them are so broke they can't afford it.

having said that, i fucking love wolf + lamb's releases and fully support them as well as labels like crosstown rebels.

i have a LOT of friends living in Williamsburg, park slope and the area and i guess they may come across as elitist pricks but i can assure you that after 5 minutes of talking to them you will realize your perception is completely biased by common wisdom. in any case, the parties in brooklyn are becoming more and more commercialized that it's not really hip anymore so don't worry, your wishes are coming to reality.


i pretty much love all the things i described. i am a big wine drinker. i like disassociative adrenaline mental states (when you force yourself to be awake for a long time, adrenaline kicks in). i like acting snobby and important, its fun. but thats me playing a certain character for one night (im the total opposite normally), i dont want to do that every weekend. zealoutry is the root of a lot of problems. the other thing is, that whole scene got old real quick; theres a lot of great aspects to clubbing that is missing from it. it doesnt have enough catharsis or cacophonic elements for my personal tastes. but i still like that style of clubbing once in a while. anyway, you have to be able to make fun of yourself before you start making fun of others.


Posted by bas on Dec-07-2009 19:51:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
Just for the record, I hate wine


Posted by Max Thomson on Dec-07-2009 21:48:

quote:
Originally posted by bogartgreens
yeah that pretty much sums it up.

not sure what his deal was, but he came off as really pretentious and self absorbed to everyone, including a lot of people who were excited to see him. started off mixing pretty decently, and then seemed to stop caring altogether. just fade in, fade out, next record, and so on...which would have been fine if there was any sort of cohesion at all.

and it didn't help that he just sat down behind the decks at afters and curled up in a fetal position after putting on a record.


what can you expect from a group that makes their name on ripping off old disco tracks then slapping their name on it and charging $2.49/track on beatport? I'm all for white labels/bootlegs/remixing but when you take the main component of a track, put a drum beat behind it, then call it your own and have the fucking audacity to release it digitally and charge full price for it you deserve to be owned up the ass in my opinion. wolf + lamb is the the first label I've actively boycotted for this reason. what they've done with that stevie wonder edit is fucking shameful, I hope lawyers crawl so far up their asses they're never able to pay off their debt.

nothing like white guys stealing black music, history repeating itself I guess.


Posted by woscar on Dec-07-2009 22:29:



It's pretty stupid to just assume things, without any actual proof.


Posted by djhaziel on Dec-07-2009 22:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson

nothing like white guys stealing black music, history repeating itself I guess.


would it make you happy if they were black guys stealing white music

just sayin'


Posted by idoru on Dec-07-2009 23:15:

quote:
Originally posted by bas


I would've expected that from you in response to the coke part, not wine.

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
nothing like white guys stealing black music, history repeating itself I guess.


You're aware that, track title and artist name aside, W+L give credit to the original as much as possible, correct? Please tell me, how do you put liner notes in a release that only comes in mp3 format?


Posted by Clovis on Dec-08-2009 02:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
what can you expect from a group that makes their name on ripping off old disco tracks then slapping their name on it and charging $2.49/track on beatport? I'm all for white labels/bootlegs/remixing but when you take the main component of a track, put a drum beat behind it, then call it your own and have the fucking audacity to release it digitally and charge full price for it you deserve to be owned up the ass in my opinion. wolf + lamb is the the first label I've actively boycotted for this reason. what they've done with that stevie wonder edit is fucking shameful, I hope lawyers crawl so far up their asses they're never able to pay off their debt.

nothing like white guys stealing black music, history repeating itself I guess.



If you're talking about the Soul Clap edits, those guys have been making edits of old songs for quite a while now and they are releasing them because people WANT them. Those two white guys have more funk than almost anyone making dance music right now and their original productions back that up. They're putting out these edits because they love the music not because they're trying to rip off Stevie Wonder.


Posted by stev� on Dec-08-2009 02:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Those two white guys have more funk than almost anyone making dance music right now


lol!


Posted by JPlay on Dec-08-2009 02:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
what can you expect from a group that makes their name on ripping off old disco tracks then slapping their name on it and charging $2.49/track on beatport? I'm all for white labels/bootlegs/remixing but when you take the main component of a track, put a drum beat behind it, then call it your own and have the fucking audacity to release it digitally and charge full price for it you deserve to be owned up the ass in my opinion. wolf + lamb is the the first label I've actively boycotted for this reason. what they've done with that stevie wonder edit is fucking shameful, I hope lawyers crawl so far up their asses they're never able to pay off their debt.

nothing like white guys stealing black music, history repeating itself I guess.


not to start a trend here since a few people already posted comments on your post, but i'm surprised you'd jump to conclusions so fast. i mean, i'm not sure if you fully understand what the label is all about. if you see the video someone posted earlier in the thread (i think it was stevo) they even say that these edits were not even planned to be released but people enjoyed them some much they created "black". i mean it's a small label dude, people know each other right now and their demands are met by producers. there is no harm intended by the producers, i can assure you that.


Posted by woscar on Dec-09-2009 16:42:

New episode from Gadi. Listening right now, some good stuff here.

Arthur Russell - This Is How We Walk on the Moon

That one totally caught me off guard, one of my favorite tracks and I hadn't heard it in years.


Posted by bigsnail on Dec-09-2009 21:00:

soul clap is really killin it right now w/ their edits and productions. i whore their tracks out around town and always get a great reaction. i really wish i could get a copy of that janet jackson edit.

cant wait to see them at wmc.


Posted by epdarks on Dec-09-2009 21:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
If you're talking about the Soul Clap edits, those guys have been making edits of old songs for quite a while now and they are releasing them because people WANT them. Those two white guys have more funk than almost anyone making dance music right now and their original productions back that up. They're putting out these edits because they love the music not because they're trying to rip off Stevie Wonder.


that's nice that people want them, ok. but it's still illegal. you don't think they have the rights to that music, do you? b/c they don't. i happened to ask that question to a very close personal friend of theirs, who will go unnamed.


Posted by Clovis on Dec-09-2009 21:32:

quote:
Originally posted by epdarks
that's nice that people want them, ok. but it's still illegal. you don't think they have the rights to that music, do you? b/c they don't. i happened to ask that question to a very close personal friend of theirs, who will go unnamed.


Cool.


Posted by idoru on Dec-09-2009 22:51:

quote:
Originally posted by epdarks
that's nice that people want them, ok. but it's still illegal. you don't think they have the rights to that music, do you? b/c they don't. i happened to ask that question to a very close personal friend of theirs, who will go unnamed.


Nobody's saying they do.


Posted by epdarks on Dec-09-2009 23:01:

well by that logic we should all be stealing our music from blogs/p2p sites.


Posted by idoru on Dec-09-2009 23:05:

Wow.


Posted by epdarks on Dec-09-2009 23:10:

so it's ok to rip off steve wonder.... but not ok to steal Tiesto - Traffic from kazaa?

frankly, i could give 2 shits about stevie wonder, or W+L for that matter.

i just fail to see how "they are the funkiest guys in dance music" translates to "let's buy music that was stolen"


Posted by Seppuku on Dec-09-2009 23:42:

Wolf + Lamb make all the rules. They'll sell Stevie Wonder's music all day, and not think twice about it.

They exist solely to shit on your morals.


Posted by woscar on Dec-10-2009 00:11:

quote:
Originally posted by epdarks
so it's ok to rip off steve wonder.... but not ok to steal Tiesto - Traffic from kazaa?






quote:
Originally posted by epdarks
i just fail to see how "they are the funkiest guys in dance music" translates to "let's buy music that was stolen"


LOL, that was how you interpreted not what he said.


Posted by djhaziel on Dec-10-2009 00:28:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar
New episode from Gadi. Listening right now, some good stuff here.


I just updated the original post with the new podcast from Gadhi + tracklist

stellar music


Posted by miamitranceman on Dec-10-2009 02:03:

It's different, but not my cup o' tea.


Pages (9): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.