TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- clockwork orange
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]
Noone is disputing that fact. I'm just saying, classifying Star Wars as anything broader than space opera is wrong.
Oh, and @ Lira, regarding this:
| quote: |
| Star Wars isn't science fiction because of the plot: with little effort you can remove the characters from that galaxy far far away and put them somewhere in Medieval times with just a few adaptations (forcesabers that feed on human spirit instead of lightsabers, for example) the story can go on. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dj_alfi Noone is disputing that fact. I'm just saying, classifying Star Wars as anything broader than space opera is wrong. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN so when you go into a bookstore to buy a star wars novel you say to the attendent "oh, could you show me to the space opera section please?" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec I think that a lot of sci-fi writers try to cast these kind of pseudospiritual magical things as actually a super-advanced form of technology. In a lot of scifi, mastery of the psyche tends to be the highest form of technology, usually employed or owned by the 'aliens', and often it represents the point at which man meets his maker, ultimate knowledge. i can think of dozens of sci fi stories in which this kind of spiritual and psychic stuff is portrayed as advanced alien technology and super intelligence. Because of this I don't agree that this kind of science fiction is really different than any 'despiritualized' science fiction. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Thanks! And agreed completely. Well, except for the metonymical part, but probably would agree did I know what it meant. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN That star wars follows a well-established mythic narrative does not preclude it from being science fiction. In 2011, something is science fiction if it has robots and spaceships. Scifi is more than just a genre now; is also a setting. The major difference between hard and soft scifi is hard spends much more time attempting to suspend your disbelief with �realistic� explanations. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Torchwood is no more science fiction than star wars. It essentially does what system-j alluded to- use science as a narrative device to create fantastic nonsense. |
By the way, System-J, did you see the reply I wrote for you?
Yes I did.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J I'm not sure you're following. What you've just described is despiritualisation. I'm not saying that pseudo-mystical themes preclude something from being science fiction, I'm saying that it depends on the discourse in which these themes are rooted. If you conflate spiritualism with technology there is an inherent subtext that is massively different to attributing it to some ineffable power that resides beyond our knowledge. The function within the plot may be absolutely identical, but the feel of the universe is radically altered. That's why so many Star Wars fans were enraged by the midichlorians idea. Perhaps a better way of putting it is that there are never metaphysics to SF spirituality, only physics. |
Sigh.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec maybe the difference in view of this is also representative of our difference in view of 'spirituality'. i'm coming from a monistic philosophy. when i say 'spiritual' i mean something more like consciousness being the fine fiber of experience and matter being the larger grain. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira Have you seen Miracle Day yet? (TW's new series) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Im 3 episodes in. so far, thoroughly unimpressed. Become too Americanised for me. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaw There's been more gay sex than other-worldliness so far...by a LOT. |
The kind that produced all those bite marks in Sushi's pillows.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaw The kind that produced all those bite marks in Sushi's pillows. |
Quite the chompers that PKC has, eh?
The real question is, how on earth did he get into my house?
There's a 'hawks' gaysex/birdfetish pun to be made here.
= 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Im 3 episodes in. so far, thoroughly unimpressed. Become too Americanised for me. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaw Huge disappointment of a season. WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE ALIENS?!?! There's been more gay sex than other-worldliness so far...by a LOT. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira Meh, I don't think I'll bother then. Time to watch "Lie To Me" and the latest series of "In Treatment" for me... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira I can't say that's what I like the most about Torchwood (the aliens, that is). I really liked the drama in the two first seasons when Tosh had a crush on Owen who bonked Gwen who was frequently harassed by Jack Harkness who in turn would bone anything that moved, including Ianto. Then they axed Owen and Tosh and Gwen became a loyal housewife. Meh. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN It still has its moments, its just not as cool. Certainly not compared to children of earth, which I thought was superb. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN It still has its moments, its just not as cool. Certainly not compared to children of earth, which I thought was superb. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN No, the beauty of torchwood was the lack of happy endings for any episode. Someone always paid or got fucked up. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaw Children of Earth was outstanding. This is like a really shitty, slow-moving version of an ultra-vague 24...with a lot of gay sex. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.