TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Compressor Shootout: Ableton/T-Racks/Waves SSL
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7 So in essence, a compressor is a compressor. When you tweak settings different compressors will sound different, but in the end, you just adjust the parameters differently and you can get almost identical results regardless? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cryophonik No, all VSTs have a sound, as Raphie so clearly "proved" above. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Raphie no a software compressor is an algo, do X if setting is Y with a predefined mathematical curve. an analogue compressor drives voltage though electronics or tubes or optical film, the results are quite different. I could recognize take 2 and 3 quite easily as they have that typical ITB wet newspaper sound which i don't like. After that i lost interest and track, which i told Cryo but he can't be asked to deliver 8 snips which can be listened in parallel. by enumeration, taking out what you know for sure are ITB characteristics I would have got there. Even by not knowing his Drawner. but hearing 4 or 5 different takes again and again in sequence, sort of resets your short term memory. whether that's relevant for an audience is a different question. In the end something gets to you or not. In Cryo's example i like the uncompressed snip the best. |
true, best ITB compressor you can own:
http://vladgsound.wordpress.com/plugins/molot/
Beats the shit out of all alternatives Cryo posted, best ITB I've EVER heard. so do yourself a favor get this one and you'll own the best and you can safely forget about the rest..... (really!!)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Raphie true, best ITB compressor you can own: http://vladgsound.wordpress.com/plugins/molot/ Beats the shit out of all alternatives Cryo posted, best ITB I've EVER heard. so do yourself a favor get this one and you'll own the best and you can safely forget about the rest..... (really!!) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Raphie no a software compressor is an algo, do X if setting is Y with a predefined mathematical curve. an analogue compressor drives voltage though electronics or tubes or optical film, the results are quite different. I could recognize take 2 and 3 quite easily as they have that typical ITB wet newspaper sound which i don't like. After that i lost interest and track, which i told Cryo but he can't be asked to deliver 8 snips which can be listened in parallel. by enumeration, taking out what you know for sure are ITB characteristics I would have got there. Even by not knowing his Drawner. but hearing 4 or 5 different takes again and again in sequence, sort of resets your short term memory. whether that's relevant for an audience is a different question. In the end something gets to you or not. In Cryo's example i like the uncompressed snip the best. |
yes, for a long time, read the FAQ on the link
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cryophonik Wow, you're pretty smart for a guy who doesn't know how to chop a .wav up for himself. Aren't you a mastering engineer? |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Raphie I'm lazy, did above on my laptop, let the file play in Chrome. but then again i'm right too, above posts to prove it ![]() Sorry Cryo, I can't write a decent song, but got half decent ears But then again, real question is, will it matter to the audience, or to put it otherwise will analogue put some subliminal ambiance on a track that your fans will appreciate more? who'll knows, probably not. |
fine Cryo, not sure what you're after, but you "win"
I've picked out 2 VSTs via my laptop, no fuzz.
Get over it, there is still a difference between SW and analogue hardware. If it matters? that's up for u to decide.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Raphie fine Cryo, not sure what you're after, but you "win" I've picked out 2 VSTs via my laptop, no fuzz. Get over it, there is still a difference between SW and analogue hardware. If it matters? that's up for u to decide. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Raphie the 1st one doesn't sound anything like my real G that's for sure and i can pick out a real 2500 from a Waves one anytime. |
cryo tell him the settings so he can post a wav
| quote: |
| Originally posted by wayfinder cryo tell him the settings so he can post a wav |
cryo, looks like i and not raphie was able to pick out which one was the hardware compressor. i feel special.
You can tell the better emulations by the attack time and the effect it has on the snare. The waves emus and the drawmer make the snare pop when you slam it. The others just sound too digital, most software comps can't get that really nice attack to them, the 1st waves emu is the only one which comes close. My ssl bus comp makes that great sound, might try and do a comparison like you suggested cryo 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.