TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- WTF National Security Agency records all of the phone records of Verizon customers
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 00:59:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
As for the subject of voting, I consider it a complete and utter myth that it would make any difference to the introduction of such policies. This kind of thing will happen and continues to happen no matter which party or politician ends up in power, and there are far too many flaws on just about every level of the democratic system for good political policy to actually be consistently rewarded. The only merit voting has is to sustain the overall structure of democracy, whereby leaders must at least affect a pretext of caring for their people if they want to prolong their personal spasm of power. So don't worry about taking responsibility for anything, because you have no real influence anyway.


100% agreed that voting makes no difference on these policies. Which is absolutely proved by the fact that both administrations and both parties have consistently voted to expand these powers. Now, in my opinion, the reason this will just keep happening is because it is necessary and a good thing.

I disagree that voting is only important for the overall structure, though. It is hugely important in local politics and domestic affairs. If no one had voted for the Tea Party fuckheads, things would be a lot better.


Posted by Spacey Orange on Jun-09-2013 01:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
How the fuck is this spying? Explain that to me before I waste anymore of my time replying to your insipid questions.


the government is secretly collecting information. how can this not be spying?


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 03:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Spacey Orange
the government is secretly collecting information. how can this not be spying?


Ah, I'm sorry. I didn't realize you were mentally handicapped.

Secretly collecting information is not spying. Spying is obtaining secret/confidential/private information without consent.


Posted by Spacey Orange on Jun-09-2013 04:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
Ah, I'm sorry. I didn't realize you were mentally handicapped.

Secretly collecting information is not spying. Spying is obtaining secret/confidential/private information without consent.


the NSA secretly collected confidential/private metadata/logs without the consent or knowledge of the cell phone customers. how the fuck is this not spying?


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 05:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Spacey Orange
the NSA secretly collected confidential/private metadata/logs without the consent or knowledge of the cell phone customers. how the fuck is this not spying?


They have no idea whose data it is. They're just collecting all metadata. To actually connect it to a person requires a warrant. Then it becomes spying - and legal.

You do realize they're not listening to your calls or reading your texts, right? All they're doing is seeing what numbers called what other numbers, and saving that data, in case they need it later.


Posted by Spacey Orange on Jun-09-2013 06:16:

i just want to encourage everyone who's even remotely interested in this topic, to read the wiki article on the fourth amendment.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four...es_Constitution

There are a lot of scholarly sources out there but it will give anyone a general idea.


Sorry I got sidetracked on whether its spying or not. The issue is whether the broad searches violate the fourth amendment. Given my limited knowledge, I believe that they do.

Moreover, i think the NSA, in this instance, is a solution looking for a problem.

Finally, I think this is a part of a larger problem, that being, the military industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about.


Posted by saluyamo on Jun-09-2013 07:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
They have no idea whose data it is. They're just collecting all metadata. To actually connect it to a person requires a warrant. Then it becomes spying - and legal.

You do realize they're not listening to your calls or reading your texts, right? All they're doing is seeing what numbers called what other numbers, and saving that data, in case they need it later.


If they have the number the calls are from then they know who said what.
How else would they be able to connect the data to the potential terrorists?


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jun-09-2013 09:10:

quote:
Originally posted by saluyamo
If they have the number the calls are from then they know who said what.
How else would they be able to connect the data to the potential terrorists?



They aren't listening to the calls at all.

Furthermore here is a funny picture of me to derail this thread.


Posted by FuzzQi on Jun-09-2013 09:18:

le epic photo


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 09:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Spacey Orange
i just want to encourage everyone who's even remotely interested in this topic, to read the wiki article on the fourth amendment.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four...es_Constitution

There are a lot of scholarly sources out there but it will give anyone a general idea.


Sorry I got sidetracked on whether its spying or not. The issue is whether the broad searches violate the fourth amendment. Given my limited knowledge, I believe that they do.

Moreover, i think the NSA, in this instance, is a solution looking for a problem.

Finally, I think this is a part of a larger problem, that being, the military industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about.


So, to summarize, you have no idea what's going on, and are freaking out about nothing.

Your fourth amendment rights are not being violated. Please actually read facts before you freak out. Thanks.


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 09:20:

quote:
Originally posted by saluyamo
If they have the number the calls are from then they know who said what.
How else would they be able to connect the data to the potential terrorists?


If they know who the number is connected to. Which they need a warrant for.

Next.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jun-09-2013 09:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Spacey Orange
i just want to encourage everyone who's even remotely interested in this topic, to read the wiki article on the fourth amendment.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four...es_Constitution

There are a lot of scholarly sources out there but it will give anyone a general idea.


Sorry I got sidetracked on whether its spying or not. The issue is whether the broad searches violate the fourth amendment. Given my limited knowledge, I believe that they do.

Moreover, i think the NSA, in this instance, is a solution looking for a problem.

Finally, I think this is a part of a larger problem, that being, the military industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about.


the easiest way for you to grasp the state of your own paranoia, is to go live overseas for a while. the US makes some people really fucken crazy. i mean, they have to be fucking stupid to begin with obviously, but it can be all down-hill from there.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jun-09-2013 09:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
If they know who the number is connected to. Which they need a warrant for.

Next.


in today's modern times surely they can just search the phonebook for matches, no warrant required?


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 09:40:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
in today's modern times surely they can just search the phonebook for matches, no warrant required?


1) Cellphones aren't in phonebooks.

2) Omg are you telling me the government is looking at public records omg spying omg im retarded omg omg omg omg omg

3)


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jun-09-2013 09:43:

quote:
Originally posted by FuzzQi
le epic photo


I'm glad I can make myself laugh haha.... Ahhh...


Posted by SherlockCrash on Jun-09-2013 14:39:

Spacey Orange, you should know better then to question things. That makes you retarded. If you don't want to be retarded any longer, just accept everything that's happening around you without giving it a second thought. You will then be all knowing and can tell other, still retarded people on forums how stupid they are when they can't see the obvious; Secretly collecting information isn't the same thing as spying.


Posted by enydo on Jun-09-2013 14:46:

Yeah. What this guys said.


Posted by OrangestO on Jun-09-2013 15:11:

Yeah. What that guy said.


Posted by enydo on Jun-09-2013 15:15:

Seriously though, if you think the concept of "digital privacy" (whatever that is supposed to mean), was ever actually a thing, you're deluding yourself.


Posted by Lagrangian on Jun-09-2013 15:31:

IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT


Posted by Lagrangian on Jun-09-2013 15:43:

Spacey Orange, I salute you, don't listen to these idiots. They all voted for Barry in the first place.

Who's the idiot now?! Lol

2016 is upon us!


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jun-09-2013 18:30:

The libertardian zerg rush and the invasion of the paulbots is well underway on reddit...

Had this fun little convo this morning: [[ LINK REMOVED ]]


I don't think that guy is actually pro-choice. Such fucking slimeballs.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jun-09-2013 18:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
They aren't listening to the calls at all.

Furthermore here is a funny picture of me to derail this thread.

[img]http://www.imgur.com/PGUfxDu.jpeg[img]



Posted by enydo on Jun-09-2013 18:52:

Omg, computer information systems function on the basis that all actions and interactions are basically logged, at some level?

Blasphemy.


Posted by Lews on Jun-09-2013 19:34:

Will be interesting to see what happens to Booz Allen, now. Such a big company, it would be insane for the government to stop working with them, but also somewhat logical.

God damn contractors running everything these days.


Pages (9): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.