TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Pro DJs that use burnt mp3s @ gigs
Pages (4): « 1 2 3 [4]

quote:

Originally posted by sandstorm03 128 is def noticeable. it sounds soo crappy

that i do agree with...in a club 128kbps mp3 is noticeable. and depending on the club system and how it's tweaked...i think 192 is also noticeable, but takes concentration and an ideal listening environment.

i think as long as it's 192 and above, it's fine by me...cuz i'm not going to be standing there trying to pick out what bit rate or what format the DJ is using right now with my ears...i'm there to have fun, not to take a hearing test anyway.

quote:

Originally posted by b i n k u n that i do agree with...in a club 128kbps mp3 is noticeable. and depending on the club system and how it's tweaked...i think 192 is also noticeable, but takes concentration and an ideal listening environment. i think as long as it's 192 and above, it's fine by me...cuz i'm not going to be standing there trying to pick out what bit rate or what format the DJ is using right now with my ears...i'm there to have fun, not to take a hearing test anyway.

something that is also key though, is how well the track was produced and mastered in the first place. Which plays a big part.

Tracks that are mediocre are the onces that seem to sound the same 192-320. The better ones and worse ones have a more noticeable difference.


I mean sometimes its hard to even tell till you actually hear the vinyl or wav of it.

Speaking of bitrates, etc, are mp3s sold in quality better/higher than 192kb/s? I know Beatport doesn't, but any other mp3 sites that do?

John O'Callaghan uses tunes bought from Audiojelly in his sets

quote:

Originally posted by robstar It's very important that dj's pay for the music they play if they didn't the sceen would collaps IMO.

Agree 100%. It's a matter of being fair, too: They're *earning* money because of those tracks.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.