TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Sports Discussion
-- The Official NHL 2008-2009 Season
Pages (55): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 »


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-23-2009 01:48:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5
rangers won in 94, but i guess that was before you jumped on the devils bandwagon. had you been watching hockey you would have actually known that. this is the new nhl with different rules and in this new nhl, the rangers have absolutely raped the devils and seeing as they will have lundqvist for a long time, you better get used to it.



Well, I was 7 years old at the time and was a Devils fan, so nice job bringing up the bandwagon point. What else are you going to throw at me, our lack of attendance (which is only 1500 lower yearly average than the Rags, whoa!), or how about Brodeur's affair with his sister-and-law (who cares!)? You're showing with each post you're a typical Ranger fan with absolutely NO idea about the game and the same talking points...

What it comes down to in the end is you guys are not a consistent or good team by any means. No one is scared of the Rangers and no one really respects them. Lundqvuist and Dubinsky are your only good players, but compared to the other better 16 teams in the league, that's not much.

Even if the Rangers have raped the Devils in this "new NHL", they're not doing a good job at raping anyone else, seeing as they finished 7th and even after tonight's game, no one thinks they are Cup contenders. Go read a Wikipedia article on hockey, it'll do you more good than the knowledge you have now..


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 01:49:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Our series is 2-2 an our team is the better more consistent one, we're not worried... The odds for us to lose our series is the same as yours. You guys lost one of your games 4-0 and you're playing in Washington to an angry 2nd place Eastern Conference leader.

You'd be RETARDED to think you're in the clear now..


the better more consistent one? really? 2-2 against a team that finished 2nd in the scrubiest division meanwhile the rangers are 3-1 against the 1st team in that division - a team that also finished ahead of the swampers. the odds are not the same. it's apparent that "your level" is that of a 10 year old. do everyone a favor and go back to listening to sean tyas. leave the hockey talk to people who actually know something. last time i checked my picks were raping the rest of the board.


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 01:52:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Well, I was 7 years old at the time and was a Devils fan, so nice job bringing up the bandwagon point. What else are you going to throw at me, our lack of attendance (which is only 1500 lower average than Rags, whoa!), or how about Brodeur's affair with his sister-and-law? You're showing with each post you're a typical Ranger fan with absolutely NO idea about the game...

Even if the Rangers have raped the Devils in this "new NHL", they're not doing a good job at raping anyone else, seeing as they finished 7th and even after tonight's game, no one thinks they are Cup contenders. Go read a Wikipedia article on hockey, it'll do you more good than the knowledge you have now..


7 years old so that's like 3 years ago you started watching hockey right? the rangers have made the playoffs every season so apparently they have been one of the best 16 teams in the league over that span.

next, lol.


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-23-2009 01:53:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5
the better more consistent one? really?



Losing 4-0 in your last game and barely squeeking by this one, that's not consistent. If you guys win the next game in Washington and seal the series, I'll be the first to say good job and call it an upset, because that's what it would be. But don't count your chickens...


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-23-2009 01:54:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5
7 years old so that's like 3 years ago you started watching hockey right? the rangers have made the playoffs every season so apparently they have been one of the best 16 teams in the league over that span.

next, lol.


I said I was 7 years old during the 94 season, are you SPECIAL NEEDS or just blind?


Posted by L.E.N. on Apr-23-2009 02:05:

So the sharks show a glimmer of hope...but playing lazy isnt going to fly. Now I just hope they dont get boned by the ducks.


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 02:12:

barely squeaking? sounds like a caps fan to me. lundqvist isn't getting lucky, he's playing the way he can play and defense is doing the same. even if you do believe they are barely squeaking, it's still better to be squeaking then losing with .2 seconds because your fat goaltender got lazy and decided to pull a hasek. LOL


Posted by chimera66 on Apr-23-2009 02:20:

sean5 why can't you just enjoy your team without saying something rude to someone else about theirs? rangers are doing much better than many would have guessed so be happy. henrik is phenomenal right now which is not only great for the rangers but great for hockey fans in general...there is nothing like watching a player in the zone (well unless they are against your team).


Posted by DJ Eco on Apr-23-2009 02:34:

He needs to insult other fans and their teams to make him feel better about his (which has won 1 Stanley Cup in 68 years)....


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 03:09:

LOL

swamper fan just mad that no one cares about his shit team. name another team that won cups and didn't turn into complete shit and still had to "upgrade" to mlk blvd just people would come to watch. even then, ranger fans still outnumber the devils fans at rangers vs devils games HAHAHA!

this queer eco is just mad because it is so easy to out these bandwagoners. there were like 10 devils fans prior to 95.


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 03:18:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
He needs to insult other fans and their teams to make him feel better about his (which has won 1 Stanley Cup in 68 years)....


and that 1 stanley cup reigns over any of the devils because they won playing boring hockey and essentially ruined the nhl in the process. the new nhl targeted them by eliminating the trap and eliminating clutch & grab.


Posted by chimera66 on Apr-23-2009 03:19:

well sean honestly after 1994 think about the boom in hockey after the rangers won. more people took notice of hockey then so technically wouldn't you classify them as "bandwagon" fans? it's ridiculous how you keep pointing the finger at people whether it be eco or len about them being bandwagon fans when you know nothing about them. they don't need to explain themselves to you and at the end of the day why don't you be a respectful fan of the sport? tomorrow i'm going to the devils game (hopefully), shit i've gone to the prudential center a number of times. you may not like the devils but like the red wings they have been the most dominant team in the nhl in the past 15 years. that deserves some type of respect.


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 03:42:

quote:
Originally posted by chimera66
well sean honestly after 1994 think about the boom in hockey after the rangers won. more people took notice of hockey then so technically wouldn't you classify them as "bandwagon" fans? it's ridiculous how you keep pointing the finger at people whether it be eco or len about them being bandwagon fans when you know nothing about them. they don't need to explain themselves to you and at the end of the day why don't you be a respectful fan of the sport? tomorrow i'm going to the devils game (hopefully), shit i've gone to the prudential center a number of times. you may not like the devils but like the red wings they have been the most dominant team in the nhl in the past 15 years. that deserves some type of respect.


if people respected devils hockey, the old nhl would still be around. BRING FROM NEW JERSEY I HAVE GONE TO MANY DEVILS GAME BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER THEY WON THE CUP. don't tell me about devils "fans" because I know what I saw.


Posted by Dj Smitty20 on Apr-23-2009 04:08:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5
and that 1 stanley cup reigns over any of the devils because they won playing boring hockey and essentially ruined the nhl in the process. the new nhl targeted them by eliminating the trap and eliminating clutch & grab.


lol. Do you really believe that the trap isn't in the NHL anymore? Or that there is no clutching and grabbing?

Oh Americans...stick to the NFL


Posted by GTS3gEclipse on Apr-23-2009 06:21:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5
if people respected devils hockey, the old nhl would still be around. BRING FROM NEW JERSEY I HAVE GONE TO MANY DEVILS GAME BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER THEY WON THE CUP. don't tell me about devils "fans" because I know what I saw.


Why do you feel the need to think that your better than every devils fan out there? You obviously arent the coldest beer in the fridge because this "dominance" you speak of is ridiculous. The season series was split 3-3 each team going 2-1 at home. I don't know if your up to 1st grade math but that's even. Even means there was no "dominant" team. Ummmmm, how else can I explain this to you.... shut up before you make yourself look like an even bigger jackass.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Apr-23-2009 10:58:

Methinks the Caps are in trouble.


Posted by Ian on Apr-23-2009 13:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Methinks the Caps are in trouble.




I'll take losing in the first round if someone decapitates sean5 & sean avery.


Posted by trunks1022 on Apr-23-2009 14:49:

lulz oh and wtf at that sean guy


Posted by verndogs on Apr-23-2009 15:43:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5


seriously chill with the trolling or else i'll have to use the ban hammer on you. your only warning


Posted by Deeks1187 on Apr-23-2009 17:10:

God the caps are playing desperate hockey right now
They aren't waiting for their chances and just taking to many low percentage shots.
Everything is way too forced


Posted by Deeks1187 on Apr-23-2009 17:11:

It would help if they could a faceoff once in a while


Posted by elFreak on Apr-23-2009 20:27:

bottom line = ovechkin 1 goal.

not going to beat anyone with that kind of production.


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 22:00:

quote:
Originally posted by verndogs
seriously chill with the trolling or else i'll have to use the ban hammer on you. your only warning


i don't give a shit if you ban me or not


Posted by sean5 on Apr-23-2009 22:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Methinks the Caps are in trouble.


did you think of that on your own or was it that expensive harvard education?


Posted by verndogs on Apr-23-2009 22:19:

quote:
Originally posted by sean5
i don't give a shit if you ban me or not


Sin bin time for you. 1 week


Pages (55): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.