TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- Airbase - Genie 2
Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Airbase Thanks! After reading the whole topic now, i believe the best idea for the future (at least for my samples), is to put it out in 96kbps and put some vocal copyright sample over the track every minute or at cruitial places. Would that be accepted? // Jezper |
Man.. I'm listening to this track everyday... I mean the 32 kbit quality.. :P
This is so good..
Good Job, Jezper! 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Airbase Thanks! After reading the whole topic now, i believe the best idea for the future (at least for my samples), is to put it out in 96kbps and put some vocal copyright sample over the track every minute or at cruitial places. Would that be accepted? // Jezper |
Good tune, it has that something catchy in it.
/ A bit off topic but I find this: "Making a 2 min really hifi sample just makes you people concentrate on the mastering and production, the two least important things of music in general" very interesting.
First: I'm no producer or anything, but I also think that the record labels don't listen to promo's the way as stated as above. It's just like you like it or don't.
Second: Neither will most of the ppl in the clubs or parties.
And p.s. don't take it wrong it's just the way i see it and i don't know nothing about producing.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Airbase is to put it out in 96kbps and put some vocal copyright sample over the track every minute or at cruitial places. Would that be accepted? // Jezper |
as always jezper, your track is awesome!
are you gonna release this on a vinyl?
nice, something different, i'm waiting for full song
quality
i love the intro !
bu i still like more the original Genie track.
thanks for sharing 
how hard is it to post a 96k OGG file....mp3 sucks for low bitrate...why not post it on .ogg....its not hard...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tc-fan how hard is it to post a 96k OGG file....mp3 sucks for low bitrate...why not post it on .ogg....its not hard... |
Ok this is more like it Jezper. Cause I can hear just what quality track you've made. This one has great energy, Bass is really uplifting. Starting with some cool fx (ringmod or so??) on the percs. The 1:22 Synth (drawing attention there) is a great one. Love it.
I like your website as well.
Good luck with this one
-Jay
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tc-fan how hard is it to post a 96k OGG file....mp3 sucks for low bitrate...why not post it on .ogg....its not hard... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djcrayzee OGG files sucks, man.. Mp3 format is much better.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djcrayzee OGG files sucks, man.. Mp3 format is much better.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vizay riiiiight, and wich rock did you say you live under? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djcrayzee OGG files sucks, man.. Mp3 format is much better.. |
i don't give a flippers about equalizing and mastering when listening to tracks here, i just want to hear the melody and whether i like it or not.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Airbase Fine, dont listen, no need to act all childish. Im not freaking tiesto, im me, and i do with my music what i want to do with it. Just trying to be friendly and share atleast something, my bad then! |
Thx for the sample
Sounds very good for me, I hope the break is at least as massive as the original version...
hahah oh man... i just wasted the last 20 minutes of my life reading this forum
bottom line: track sounds really tite
keep doin what you do. Would be nice to see ya review a lil more tho.
I can't believe people are so paranoid about samples being on the net....believe me, labels dont care if there are 128k full tracks with the ending/beginning faded or a 192k sample flying about.. IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL.... some of the biggest tracks of this/last year were all over the net before they were signed...its rediculous and a 32kbps mp3 is taking the piss, how can you expect to get feedback on that pile of shite quality.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Kendall I can't believe people are so paranoid about samples being on the net....believe me, labels dont care if there are 128k full tracks with the ending/beginning faded or a 192k sample flying about.. IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL.... some of the biggest tracks of this/last year were all over the net before they were signed...its rediculous and a 32kbps mp3 is taking the piss, how can you expect to get feedback on that pile of shite quality. |
I was just about to ask the same thing
george: if youre speaking out of your own experience then I suggest you switch label faster than the lightning
One little question for u Jesper.
Do u release your singles on cd ? (Don't buy vinyl!)
______________________________________________________________________
My new wave of sound!
find it here: http://plooxia.mine.nu/~plooxia
right click! and save target
omfg.what a thread.
even in such quality this tune rocks.
why are you so envyous,men?
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.