Perfecto Presents: Club / Mixed By Paul Oakenfold

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- Perfecto Presents: Club / Mixed By Paul Oakenfold
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]

Posted by asuwere on Feb-15-2005 13:42:

Yo! Haters, this is for you.

What's PPK doing on here? Just listen to it a few more times then maybe you'll realize why. What's Oakenfold's stated goal again? To reach a larger audience? What about all those annoying pop song remixes on there? So how does it all fit together? Why isn't it like Tranceport? Hahah...WTF Blah blah blah You're stuck on permanent noob status. Is all your infinite wisdom making you millions a year? Do me a favor and confine yourselves to your homes. Don't come outside anymore. You just don't get it.

Posted by benchristopher on Feb-24-2005 21:54:

Oakey did it again!! he's the man

Posted by rococcoco on Mar-21-2005 00:01:

don't know what happened to this guy since Bunkka... what about the innovative sound like the essential mix world tour '99? For me the best mixes in the history of dance music... He's the man showed me for what TRANCE stands. But i really don't know what to do with a compilation like this one here. Please tell me

Posted by Cloud on Mar-21-2005 12:28:

I destroyed it...

Posted by Phortastic on Mar-21-2005 20:47:

quote:
Originally posted by memusa

That said, the overall impression I get from CD is very poor. The Perfecto All Starz tracks are very good, but most of Oakenfold's remixes are very poor. Also, including tracks like Beautiful Day, Ressurection and Southern Sun is lazy and lacking of innovation.

that sums it up perfectly, but then again if he didnt include those poppy sucky mixes no-one of the target people would buy this...

Posted by rococcoco on Mar-21-2005 23:34:

can't believe that the man really needs this money...

Posted by Phortastic on Mar-21-2005 23:37:

quote:
Originally posted by rococcoco
can't believe that the man really needs this money...

dude Oakie is not the only one profiting from this you know. The label gets a nice share of the load also. And i think they would rather see this getting sold alot then not, hence the poppy tracklist

Posted by rococcoco on Mar-22-2005 22:47:

okay but isn't that aspect a bit sad?

Posted by Phortastic on Mar-23-2005 00:58:

quote:
Originally posted by rococcoco
okay but isn't that aspect a bit sad?

welcome to the business world

Posted by WM2 on Mar-25-2005 05:45:

Biggest disappointment so far this year. I know it's a soundtrack for some stupid ass tv show, but could you at least pick some good songs. I know he's trying to connect with a larger audience, but pick music that can actually be called music. Justin Homolake is not music. It's pure shit. Not only that you could get the same level of mixing if you put the CD in a player and hit shuffle.

Posted by armandzadza on Mar-26-2005 07:48:

quote:
Originally posted by asuwere
Yo! Haters, this is for you.

What's PPK doing on here? Just listen to it a few more times then maybe you'll realize why. What's Oakenfold's stated goal again? To reach a larger audience? What about all those annoying pop song remixes on there? So how does it all fit together? Why isn't it like Tranceport? Hahah...WTF Blah blah blah You're stuck on permanent noob status. Is all your infinite wisdom making you millions a year? Do me a favor and confine yourselves to your homes. Don't come outside anymore. You just don't get it.

Yo! I get it! Oakenfold should make disjointed CD's and we should all worship him, because he makes millions a year!

I am so glad that you have enlightened me!!!

P.S. Resurrection might be the only decent track on the CD. It was actually composed by a real musician (Eduard Artemiev) and used in the soundtrack of a Soviet movie 'Sibiriada' back in the 1970's. Then PPK remade the track and signed it to Perfecto. But you knew that already.

Posted by bilaal on Mar-27-2005 09:46:

lost the plot

Oakenfold i luv u. i respect u. whats goin on. looks like u have lost the plot.
please please come back.

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]