TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Radio Slave is as formulaic a producer as Deadmau5
Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »


Posted by julien2 on Apr-25-2008 19:15:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
I guess it's the musicians who are capable of thriving without relying entirely on a formulaic approach to the music they make who I really think have staying power. This doesn't mean I don't have loads of cookie cutter techno and tech house in my CD book, but those don't tend to stick around for all together too long.


True.

only those are able to create trends and stay on top.

and i guess everyone needs fillers for the cd book, dont we ?


Posted by bas on Apr-25-2008 19:18:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
I don't know - I feel like I see some variation of:



...pops up pretty often throughout TA. Like a few dozen times a day.

Oh I agree with that, I'm talking more on the blindness. Are there more threads/posts of artists getting praise for their formulaic tracks, or more threads/posts of artists getting slammed for their formulaic tracks? I definitely see more negative than positive.

ps
I thought I totally had a point at some time during this, I don't think I do anymore


Posted by stev�sto on Apr-25-2008 19:18:

quote:
Originally posted by bas


How does hanging out with him, several times mind you, and various conversations not equate to knowing someone?


i mean know someone as in what they do to get their music exposed. i hung out with him too, at bed. he's a nice guy and doesn't hold too high of an opinion of himself, but that has nothing to do with how contracts are negotiated. and what you told me just explains rjt or clovis's, whoever it was, their attitude of making it a mission to prove me wrong, when there is no wrong or right its all speculation.


Posted by RJT on Apr-25-2008 19:23:

quote:
Originally posted by bas
Oh I agree with that, I'm talking more on the blindness. Are there more threads/posts of artists getting praise for their formulaic tracks, or more threads/posts of artists getting slammed for their formulaic tracks? I definitely see more negative than positive.


I don't think it weighs heavily in one direction or the other - it's just strange to me to see it come up as often as it does, and to realize that I myself had used kind of similar arguments against tunes without thinking what I was actually saying.


Posted by bas on Apr-25-2008 19:25:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
i mean know someone as in what they do to get their music exposed. i hung out with him too, at bed. he's a nice guy and doesn't hold too high of an opinion of himself, but that has nothing to do with how contracts are negotiated. and what you told me just explains rjt or clovis's, whoever it was, their attitude of making it a mission to prove me wrong, when there is no wrong or right its all speculation.

And I'm telling you it's not fucking speculation mate. Matt isn't some punk fuck kid that came out of the woodwork with Reason and a Yamaha keyboard his mom got him for Christmas. Do you want to know what he did to get his tracks played? Aside from being a resident at Ministry of Sound for years (sometime in the mid 90s I believe): he started his own record label, joined forces with Serge Santiago and started making and signing music that other djs wanted to play. "Dick sucking" (I know you don't mean it in the literal sense) just isn't a factor and you're going to have to accept it. I don't really know what else to say.

Also, talking to him for 15 mins at B.E.D. hardly qualifies as knowing someone.


Posted by stev�sto on Apr-25-2008 19:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
woosh


just a recap, instead of a woosh: you couldve explained why or what i said was wrong or what point was missed, but rather you decide to google an image of straws and post that. but yet, when julien essentially does the same thing by saying "fail", you correct him on it. when i point that out to you, you say "woosh". is this right?


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:28:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
i mean know someone as in what they do to get their music exposed. i hung out with him too, at bed. he's a nice guy and doesn't hold too high of an opinion of himself, but that has nothing to do with how contracts are negotiated. and what you told me just explains rjt or clovis's, whoever it was, their attitude of making it a mission to prove me wrong, when there is no wrong or right its all speculation.



I don't want to sit here and act like I'm privy with all the producers in the scene, but with RS, I have had more than just casual conversations with him about the weather. I'm not going by what I read on RA, or some blog. I'm going by what I've heard from him and other artists and people close to him. Like I said before. I'm not fucking speculating as to whether or not he has "sucked dick" to get where he is. You can keep claiming that we're both at the same level, and I can keep explaining, that we're not. Or you can accept that in this instance you are speculating and I am talking about fact and reality, because I AM. I don't know what else to tell you. What you said. Was FLAT. OUT. Wrong. That is what I am telling you. It is no longer a matter of opinion, its a matter of reality vs. assumption. Again, whether or not you choose to accept that is your own personal choice.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:29:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
just a recap, instead of a woosh: you couldve explained why or what i said was wrong or what point was missed, but rather you decide to google an image of straws and post that. but yet, when julien essentially does the same thing by saying "fail", you correct him on it. when i point that out to you, you say "woosh". is this right?



Posting a photo of straws to point out that you are clutching at them, is different than saying "fail".

If you don't understand why that is, then there's no point in continuing the conversation.


Posted by l�cid on Apr-25-2008 19:35:

Three reasons why Radio Slave is better than Deadmau5:

1. His name isn't "Radio 5lave."
2. He doesn't have an acccount on TA.
2. He doesn't hang out with Tommy Lee.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:38:

quote:
Originally posted by l�cid
Three reasons why Radio Slave is better than Deadmau5:

1. His name isn't "Radio 5lave."
2. He doesn't have an acccount on TA.
2. He doesn't hang out with Tommy Lee.



This thread has reached maximum potential.


Posted by stev�sto on Apr-25-2008 19:38:

quote:
Originally posted by bas
And I'm telling you it's not fucking speculation mate. Matt isn't some punk fuck kid that came out of the woodwork with Reason and a Yamaha keyboard his mom got him for Christmas.


i didnt imply that.

quote:

Do you want to know what he did to get his tracks played?


you dont know what he did to get his tracks played and neither does anyone else in this thread.

quote:

Aside from being a resident at Ministry of Sound for years (sometime in the mid 90s I believe): he started his own record label, joined forces with Serge Santiago and started making and signing music that other djs wanted to play.


him and many others have done the same or more, not all of them receive the same level of attention though. some people are just overrated, thats all.

quote:

"Dick sucking" (I know you don't mean it in the literal sense) just isn't a factor and you're going to have to accept it. I don't really know what else to say.


i stand by what i say. these days it really has a lot to do with how you self promote yourself, whether or not you have had a track signed or played by so and so, how "relevant" your sound is, what services are exchanged, and less about creativity or content. you can say "oh no not matt he's such a nice guy we know him we've partied together" all you want.

quote:

Also, talking to him for 15 mins at B.E.D. hardly qualifies as knowing someone.


see above.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:39:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
i didnt imply that.



no and neither does anyone else in this thread.



him and many others have done the same or more, not all of them receive the same level of attention though. some people are just overrated, thats all.



i stand by what i say. these days it really has a lot to do with how you self promote yourself, whether or not you have had a track signed or played by so and so, how "relevant" your sound is, what services are exchanged, and less about creativity or content. you can say "oh no not matt he's such a nice guy we know him we've partied together" all you want.



see above.



You are thick as fucking brick wall. Absolutely no use continuing this.

In any case, enjoy your stay in Assumption World.


Posted by bas on Apr-25-2008 19:41:

It's like talking to a child


Posted by stev�sto on Apr-25-2008 19:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
You are thick as fucking brick wall. Absolutely no use continuing this.

In any case, enjoy your stay in Assumption World.


you know, it really doesnt matter to me. almost every post from you and the gang in response to me is usually an insult with the f word. no need to get emotional.


Posted by l�cid on Apr-25-2008 19:45:

quote:
Originally posted by l�cid
Three reasons why Radio Slave is better than Deadmau5:

1. His name isn't "Radio 5lave."
2. He doesn't have an acccount on TA.
2. He doesn't hang out with Tommy Lee.

4. He's balding.

it's gotta count for something.


Posted by Guest on Apr-25-2008 19:45:

quote:
Originally posted by l�cid
Three reasons why Radio Slave is better than Deadmau5:

1. His name isn't "Radio 5lave."



LOLOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
LL


Posted by RJT on Apr-25-2008 19:46:

quote:
Originally posted by l�cid
4. He's balding.

it's gotta count for something.


I knew there was a reason I liked you.

We should meet some time IRL. Dinner and then raving?


Posted by stev�sto on Apr-25-2008 19:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Posting a photo of straws to point out that you are clutching at them, is different than saying "fail".

If you don't understand why that is, then there's no point in continuing the conversation.


how is that different? they are both easy outs. instead of actually conversing or explaining anything, a simple one word is the same as a picture, both of them are escaping an argument.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:51:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
you know, it really doesnt matter to me. almost every post from you and the gang in response to me is usually an insult with the f word. no need to get emotional.



I happen to enjoy using cuss words, sorry. And when you come on and say someone has sucked dick to get where they are when I personally know for fact that they haven't, it just might elicit that type of response.

You keep claiming that no one really knows, I keep explaining, that I do, in fact know, and yet here we are right where we started because of your inability to accept a valid opinion from someone else.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:51:

quote:
Originally posted by stev�sto
how is that different? they are both easy outs. instead of actually conversing or explaining anything, a simple one word is the same as a picture, both of them are escaping an argument.



Fucking hell. I am exiting this thread now.


Rob can i get a ASCII forehead slap?


Posted by RJT on Apr-25-2008 19:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Fucking hell. I am exiting this thread now.


Rob can i get a ASCII forehead slap?


������������..__����������������
���������..,-~*'`�lllllll`*~,��������������
�������..,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll�`*-,������������
������,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,�����������.
�����,-*lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllll.�����������
����.;*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll,-~*~-,llllllllllllllllllll����������..
����..lllllllllllllllllllllllllll/���;;;;llllllllllll,-`~-,���������
����...lllllllllllllllllllll,-*���..`~-~-,�(.(�`*,`,��������..
�����.llllllllllll,-~*�������)_-..*`*;..)��������.
�����..,-*`�,*`)����,-~*`~.����.../��������..
�����...|/.../�/~,�...-~*,-~*`;�����./.��������..
�����../.../�/�/..,-,..*~,.`*~*�����.*...��������
�����.|.../�/�/.*`......��������)�.)�`~,�����...
�����.|./�/�./��.)��,.)`*~-,���.../�.|..)�`~-,����.
�����/./.../�,*`-,�..`-,�*`�.,---�...�./�../..|��...�```*~-,,,,
����...(���.)`*~-,�.`*`.,-~*.,-*��|�/.�/�/������..
�����.*-,��.`*-,...`~,..``.,,,-*���.|.,*...,*�|����..��..
������.*,���`-,�)-,����..,-*`...,-*�.(`-,������.
��................f`-,���`-,/�*-,___,,-~*�.,-*��|�`-,���.��.

Edit: I'd close it, but I can't be arsed with the "OMG U R 5o l4m3 for closing teh thread" nonsense that would inevitably follow.


Posted by l�cid on Apr-25-2008 19:55:

inb4dalock.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-25-2008 19:55:

outb4dalock


Posted by noikeee on Apr-25-2008 19:58:

For a start, let me say I'm in the clear since I never was up Radioslave's bum.

Now that's settled, here's my take on this: I think people love to say what they want in music is originality, but that's not strictly true. What people like in music is certain elements that appeal to them in some way - and they learn over time to add new elements to the "list" of things they like. Similarly, they can also get sick to death of certain elements if they hear them too often.

There are two things that lead people to think originality in music is everything: first, when a track is appealing AND sounds fresh to them in some way, that fact magnifies the experience they get from listening to it. Second, making original music is harder than making formulatic music, therefore the producers who manage to come up with some of it have more merit.

People take these two things and rationalize them to think what they want in music is originality. In reality, they can love just as much an original track as something completely formulatic.

That's what happens with these producers - Radio Slave appeals to a lot of people here, who like looped, techy, dark music. Deadmau5 doesn't, because they're sick to death of that kind of in-your-face happy melodies, and his tracks generate a cheap feeling in their minds (that's my opinion). Most people HAVE liked this kind of music, but haven't gotten sick of the Radio Slave looped kind of thing. *Yet* - although there's a chance they might never get sick of it.

And since they like it, they think - well if I like it, I guess it must be because it's original! So they go search for every little detail in the music that sounds just slightly different to all the other 50 previous releases, and argue in music forums that those details make all the "originality". Not different from how epic trance fans will get all excited, when their fav producer uses a 32-bar melody instead of his usual 16-bar melody. Must be forward thinking!

So to summarize: I agree with RJT's general line of thought, and managed to write a shitload of words for basically nothing.


Posted by julien2 on Apr-25-2008 19:58:

Rob: the thread has pretty much been answered. maybe it should in fact be closed.

isnt it how it happens IRL ?

haha

in fact, maybe the internets would be a better place if there was an automatic [ANSWERED] function.


Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.