Why trance is #1 ? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Why trance is #1 ?
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]

Posted by Funkesthesiac69 on Oct-16-2008 21:19:

quote:
Originally posted by delusional
anymore thought on trance ? Or why there is sooooo much bad trance

The commercialization of Trance music to try to appeal to a wider base, in turn alienated some of its most loyal followers. Trends change and DJs get tired of spinning the same style of tunes, just a thought.

Posted by Clovis on Oct-16-2008 21:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Neo95gt
You ever leave your room? I'm talking about every club in the us that plays the NYC Undergroud CD on loop. It's not that hard you fags. jesus

I go out several nights a week sometimes here in LA and I get to hear good music pretty much everytime.

I guess it sucks in your area?

Posted by RebeL9 on Oct-16-2008 22:26:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why trance is #1 ?

quote:
Originally posted by Trance-MB
Sure, but not many knew or have seen that back then. Record stores didn't sell that underground music.
I don't think trance would have spread so wide without Eurohouse or the German Techno.

yeah it was a small scene. but still. it existed and was striving.

Posted by Neo95gt on Oct-17-2008 00:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
I go out several nights a week sometimes here in LA and I get to hear good music pretty much everytime.

I guess it sucks in your area?

Nope NYC has plenty of places with good tunes, just a lot more with cheesy music. It's like that in LA too. Not too hard to understand since that music is pretty commercial. Most places play top 40 and cheesy house, it's really not that difficult of a concept.

Posted by wolftickets on Oct-17-2008 00:52:

"Trance is dead. Ferry Corsten killed it"(but Armin put the final nail in the coffin). Ok, it's not dead, but it's certainly not #1 anymore, most of the once trance producers are now minimal, tech-house(sometimes techtrance), or nu-electro-cheese.

Posted by Neo95gt on Oct-17-2008 00:57:

quote:
Originally posted by wolftickets
"Trance is dead. Ferry Corsten killed it"(but Armin put the final nail in the coffin). Ok, it's not dead, but it's certainly not #1 anymore, most of the once trance producers are now minimal, tech-house(sometimes techtrance), or nu-electro-cheese.

Can you please explain how Ferry or Armin or any of the big names killed trance? thx.

Posted by Unable on Oct-17-2008 01:30:

FFS the last post has let you down there Neo, thought you were playing an ok game until then.

Not sure why people (Americans) think Trance is even close to being the most popular form of EDM globally.

Posted by Neo95gt on Oct-17-2008 01:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Unable
FFS the last post has let you down there Neo, thought you were playing an ok game until then.

Not sure why people (Americans) think Trance is even close to being the most popular form of EDM globally.

Sorry, I just like the thought process behind some things.

Posted by airwalker1 on Oct-17-2008 02:04:

Posted by delusional on Oct-17-2008 21:32:

Ferry is garbage

Posted by adi_hanson on Oct-17-2008 21:35:

trance must remain underground

because if you become famous or remotely recognized because of trance

may you die a horrible horrible death

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]