TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Trentemøller- an example of pure talent!!!!
Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »


Posted by sljiva on Nov-10-2008 12:43:

quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
I mean, a 70-minute bleep-blop sequence with some effects thrown-in could be excellent for a small sweaty club (and cocaine is a helluva drug) but its not...like...real music. I can understand the "rawness"/let-loose purpose of such techno sets, but truth it, they are not something memorable. because the tracks themselves are not memorable. Because there are no themes or even some basic musicianship associated with those tracks, just production-tricks and effects which would hopefully "push all the right buttons" and make some random drunk punter's (lol at this British word)mind (?) and/or body move. Ofcourse, this is not necessarily a bad thing, and as i said before, one can have the time of his/her life dancing to this kind of music in a small sweaty club (and cocaine can be a helluva drug). Its just, not something of high quality, and consequently (IMO) not something i would come back to and/or appreciate as the time passes. I guess though that its not the purpose of such music though.


I guess El Freak, Clovis, RJT, Mark Anthony and similar cool dudes that hang around here all day discussing mnml/tech/deep/whatever (among other things) are actually well aware of this (in a 30 years time, I bet we'll still remember and respect tracks/albums by Underworld, Leftfield, Autechre..., not so much by Radio Slave, Gui Boratto or John Dahlbäck). However, that shit is trendy right now, they are trendy guys, and TA is a trendy board. Your preaching will not change a thing. If you don't like them (or music they listen), go to some untrendy forum like WATMM, Drum & Bass Arena, Dubstepforum, Trance.nu and you won't have any problems.


Posted by lindt on Nov-10-2008 16:04:

quote:
yes, he is a post-teenage-fanboy full of angst



Posted by PETRAN on Nov-10-2008 16:30:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
I guess El Freak, Clovis, RJT, Mark Anthony and similar cool dudes that hang around here all day discussing mnml/tech/deep/whatever (among other things) are actually well aware of this (in a 30 years time, I bet we'll still remember and respect tracks/albums by Underworld, Leftfield, Autechre..., not so much by Radio Slave, Gui Boratto or John Dahlbäck). However, that shit is trendy right now, they are trendy guys, and TA is a trendy board. Your preaching will not change a thing. If you don't like them (or music they listen), go to some untrendy forum like WATMM, Drum & Bass Arena, Dubstepforum, Trance.nu and you won't have any problems.



I completely understand and support what you say here, i have actually downloaded some sets from all these people you mentioned and i didn't find anything to like lol (waiting for massive flame-wave). Low-quality music but maybe good for some...fucked-up dancefloor of some sorts...who knows...



I'm not trying to preach or anything like that, i'm just stating my opinion (the reason i keep using "IMO" all the time) about the state of current EDM and my beliefs about some specific forms of music.


Yes, im sometimes wondering myself why i steel come back to this forum, and the reason would probably be that there are some people here who i enjoy talking to, because of their musical knowledge and their attitude towards music and things in general. For example, we may have quarreled repeatedly in the past, but i always check your recommendations (for example i recently checked your Digitonal and Derek Carr recommendations and they were very good-thanks)because i know that you know your stuff and you have good taste in general. Thats the reason i still come here, because of a few people who i enjoy talking to and exchange ideas and musical information.


Plus, i enjoy giving recommendations myself. People think that whenever i come-up with a catalogue, i do it for the purposes of "showing-off" or something like that, well, not at all, i do it for the slightest of chance that somebody would check those names and learn something new (well, maybe i do it in a bit of a "preachy" way lol). I don't know if those names i mentioned before (as comparable to some tracks by Trentemoller) are actually related, but i got the feeling that they were (and these are the first names i came-up with-i didn't think of it a lot) so someone would actually dig and find something good. People tend to learn about Trentemoller's slower musical tracks through his techno sets and tunes, i'd just wanted to inform that there are other names who play just this sort of slower, more musical electronic music (and who don't make techno) who are worth checking-out, thats all. I don't understand why people were/are pissed about that (and i doubt they have listened to all the albums, names and tunes i listed but thats another story...)Anyway, thats all.


quote:
Originally posted by Lindt




Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 16:43:

the thing is i think all of us listen to just more than techno and put a genre label on what we play because it is easier for people to swallow and people like labels.

(not trying to self promote) but if you look at the sets, there are still some progressive elements(insomniac delights is way closer to what digweed would play than hawtin...ichs mein techs mex has deep house and funky mastiksoul in it...ect), trancy tech house (it would be called trance if the bpm was higher), and on top of that although i do like mnml i do not play very much real mnml and usually use it as a dj tool for layering. I have been collecting records since the 90's and have all genres, which will only be disposable to those who chose to make it so. Musics relevance in 30 years time is only relevant depending on the person and his preference. Electronic music as a whole is irrelevant to the mainstream (barring perhaps the 90's house explosion and euro), so even the subject of relevance is subjective. I have a shit tons of trance, i just don't really feel like playing it, it does not mean i hate it.


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 16:46:

also if you were calling trentemoller minimal...that shit is funny.


Posted by limpboy on Nov-10-2008 18:08:

massive wall of text that have nothing to do with my topic.

one love people!...if you dont think Trentemoller is talented...that is fine, but he is not your average DJ, that is for sure. here is an example why !


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tqjmf5M4gjU


Posted by Mr Game+Watch on Nov-10-2008 18:15:

quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN
Wow, how many sets have you recorded? Anyway, erm im not very fond of this style...(Samim-i vomit-no offence)so, whats like the best set lol?


I've only listened to about 3 or 4 of them, but so far "An Evening With Itchy Hottin" has been my favorite.


Posted by PETRAN on Nov-10-2008 19:17:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
the thing is i think all of us listen to just more than techno and put a genre label on what we play because it is easier for people to swallow and people like labels.

(not trying to self promote) but if you look at the sets, there are still some progressive elements(insomniac delights is way closer to what digweed would play than hawtin...ichs mein techs mex has deep house and funky mastiksoul in it...ect), trancy tech house (it would be called trance if the bpm was higher), and on top of that although i do like mnml i do not play very much real mnml and usually use it as a dj tool for layering. I have been collecting records since the 90's and have all genres, which will only be disposable to those who chose to make it so. Musics relevance in 30 years time is only relevant depending on the person and his preference. Electronic music as a whole is irrelevant to the mainstream (barring perhaps the 90's house explosion and euro), so even the subject of relevance is subjective. I have a shit tons of trance, i just don't really feel like playing it, it does not mean i hate it.




Ok, from the "Dark Sun Machine", its mostly this new-wave of minimalistic techno stuff. Now, i don't want to criticise your sets because im not simply into that kind of music (and as you said before its like asking a progr-rock fan comment on death metal-i found the prog-rock analogy better than hip-hop-and you know a prog-rock fan would tell you just his view of death-metal and it would probably be that "death-metal is shit" which...is just...a view...a correct one...)


Now i don't know about what is going to be "relative" in 30 years time and i can see what you are saying about everything being relevant (subjective maybe?) etc. But man, the truth is that in 30 years time...no one in the world is gonna remember music like the one featured in your sets (sorry if your other sets have different music i just base my opinion on this one although from the track selection of your other sets i can clearly see what you are about), and when i say "no one", i mean NO ONE, in an absolute way not as in expression. I'm not doing it to review or criticise your sets, there are other people into this kind of music who gonna do that, its this particular kind of music im criticising here. These tracks are not going to be remembered in like 3 years time not in 30 (well they may be remembered by the producers themselves).


I know about the "subjectivity" of music and stuff, but hell, lets be realistic here, this music is not to be taken seriously, its just quirky, funny music made for the purposes of instant, short-lived fun, not as a piece of art. Ok, it may be nice to DJ and have fun to such music (although i would leave the club immediately despite the fact that coke can be a helluva drug)but its not something to praise as a kind of serious listening experience, this is common sense. It pisses me off wen people support this kind of music as something serious, the reason being that if all people jump in whatever shit bondwagon exists at the moment, well, EDM is not progressing in the good (right is not appropriate i guess) direction man.



These "producers" spawn-out dumbed-down mindless, stupid-as-hell tracks by the bucketload just to sell whatever they can in beatport, at least in the short amount of time these tracks are gonna be remembered, and even if producers start doing it for the purposes of "aletrantive and/or experimental artistic expression" they end-up doing it because its hot at the moment, it sells and because damn labels are not gonna sign the tracks if they are not dumbed-down, mindless click-and-glitch bollocks that sell, because some drunk,modern drugged-out low-life punter like to dance his/her head-off in a dodgy club.And don't sell me this is the "underground", underground and EDM have absolutely nothing in common nowadays. These tracks are so "underground" they are just a click-away hell.These tracks are not going to be forgotten (in 3 years time-maximum) because they are not famous, but because they are shit lol.


Anyway, i don't see why you keep mentioning trance, no-one ever mentioned trance except maybe Trance-MB a few pages back, and no-one i think ever told explicitly that Trentemoller is minimal, although i can see that his music (at least the one featured in the album) is a mix of the modern minimalistic techno stuff,maybe a bit of IDM,as well as dub, trip-hop and post-rock elements (these genres apply selectively for some of the tracks). He has some more pure "minimal/dub techno" tracks e.g. "Chameleon", "Nightwalker", "Evil Dub" are exactly made in the style of the Basic Channel/Chain Reaction minimal/dub techno stuff, plus some tracks like "Polar Shift" and "Nam Nam" are related to this nu-school clicks-and-glitches minimalistic techno style. But this post is not about genres lol.


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 19:35:

the advent of the mp3 has made most music disposable to the click and pick generation, where as genres like rock from the 60's and 70's have always been held in higher esteem due to different social values and the music being something that played a huge role in the generations identity. Hint: no one will remember what you like in 30 years either for reasons almost identical to everything you just posted.

that simple.


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 19:39:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
(in a 30 years time, I bet we'll still remember and respect tracks/albums by Underworld, Leftfield, Autechre..., not so much by Radio Slave, Gui Boratto or John Dahlbäck).


this is what i meant petran.

the fact that these artists are not in vogue at all and sell less today, guarantees that in 30 years they will be even less relevant than they are today for the majority of people.

this comment equates to : i like this more so more people will remember it.

you both know it.

the majority of the population has no clue who any of these people are.(icluding those i actually prefer.)

ps sljiva: at least get what we like right


Posted by Trance-M on Nov-10-2008 20:01:

quote:
Originally posted by PETRAN

Yes, im sometimes wondering myself why i steel come back to this forum, and the reason would probably be that there are some people here who i enjoy talking to, because of their musical knowledge and their attitude towards music and things in general.



That crossed my mind too lately.....


On topic:

It looks like Trentemoller isn't making tracks which fit genres I like or used to like. To me most tracks I heard sound old or dated, like they are 15 years old. So I wonder why he is so talented? Please explain.

I do like the beginning of this one, but just until the vocals start:

You and I - Filur (Trentemøller Remix)


Posted by sljiva on Nov-10-2008 20:32:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
this is what i meant petran.

the fact that these artists are not in vogue at all and sell less today, guarantees that in 30 years they will be even less relevant than they are today for the majority of people.

this comment equates to : i like this more so more people will remember it.

you both know it.

the majority of the population has no clue who any of these people are.(icluding those i actually prefer.)

ps sljiva: at least get what we like right


It's not "I like this more so more people will remember it" thing at all, I just listed some usual suspects which people hold very high in regard (they are critically acclaimed and in pretty much every "best EDM groups ever" poll these acts end up on top). Plus, they actually made something new and innovative at some point of their career (unlike pretty much every artist in your playlists). Why they sell less than before? I don't care, I never really bothered about sales (although I'd love to see some stats if you can provide them). Why they aren't in vogue? Don't know (care) either. Not being in vogue doesn't mean they're forgotten. Derrick May, Juan Atkins, Marshall Jefferson, Adonis and Farley "Jackmaster" Funk are also far from spotlight these days, does that mean they'll be forgotten in 30 years time?


Posted by Renzo on Nov-10-2008 20:41:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
Have to agree with the overrated statement. People who are amazed by Trent are probably listening to some pretty boring music. Can't blame them however, there's just too much music these days, but also this "everything that's not minimized sucks" attitude cool EDM guys are promoting these days doesn't help either.


Easily the dumbest post I have seen in weeks. Congratulations.


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 20:42:

links to these polls. (i look forward to seeing exactly who was polled...and giving you the same answer you would probably give in regards to the dj mag top dj poll, trance addict poll etc.)

also, i love each and every one of those detroit soldiers, and have paid top dollar to see them whenever possible and have an extensive catalogue of their releases on vinyl, but guess what, in 30 years they will be a footnote and forgotten.

99% percent of the world has no clue who these legends are now, do you think in 30 years they will be classics?

come on man.


Posted by sljiva on Nov-10-2008 20:54:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
links to these polls. (i look forward to seeing exactly who was polled...and giving you the same answer you would probably give in regards to the dj mag top dj poll, trance addict poll etc.)


After you give me the link about sales stats

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
also, i love each and every one of those detroit soldiers, and have paid top dollar to see them whenever possible and have an extensive catalogue of their releases on vinyl, but guess what, in 30 years they will be a footnote and forgotten.

99% percent of the world has no clue who these legends are now, do you think in 30 years they will be classics?

come on man.


Sorry if I didn't mention this earlier, but when I said we I meant EDM community. Of course I don't expect some Alabama kid who's born on this day to know about Juan Atkins in 30 years, but I sincerely believe that every serious EDM lover these days (and in 30 years time) knows who is he and what he's done for electronic music in general. Just like we today know and respect Kraftwerk or Tangerine Dream even if majority of us weren't even born when they released their most important work.


Posted by limpboy on Nov-10-2008 20:56:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
After you give me the link about sales stats



Sorry if I didn't mention this earlier, but when I said we I meant EDM community. Of course I don't expect some Alabama kid who's born on this day to know about Juan Atkins in 30 years, but I sincerely believe that every serious EDM lover these days (and in 30 years time) knows who is he and what he's done for electronic music in general. Just like we today know and respect Kraftwerk or Tangerine Dream even if majority of us weren't even born when they released their most important work.


am really confused from all these massive post...is this about trentmoller?


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Nov-10-2008 20:57:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
the fact that these artists are not in vogue at all and sell less today, guarantees that in 30 years they will be even less relevant than they are today for the majority of people.

this comment equates to : i like this more so more people will remember it.


I'll bet that Underworld still outsell almost any artist you've played in your set archive, and I can still walk into just about any record store and pick up a copy of Leftism. It's even in the university music library, next to a Classic Chicago House compilation. They don't sell as much as perhaps they did, but they still have a resonant popularity, and often popularity is all you need for immortality.

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
also, i love each and every one of those detroit soldiers, and have paid top dollar to see them whenever possible and have an extensive catalogue of their releases on vinyl, but guess what, in 30 years they will be a footnote and forgotten.


It's already been 25 years since the birth of house and techno and there's no danger of anyone forgetting the key names and people in the next five years. The music PETRAN is talking about, however, has been made in the last three or four years. So the techno and house legends will easily last the 30 year count and I'm willing to bet they'll get to forty and beyond because whilever EDM exists they'll be responsible for it.

quote:
99% percent of the world has no clue who these legends are now, do you think in 30 years they will be classics?


Nobody mentioned anything about 99% of the world. Sljiva said "we" which presumably means fans of electronic music.


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 20:58:

i will concur with that to an extent.

the thing is what people hold dear to them will always be dear to them, what people hold dear to them will not always be dear to what other people hold dear to them.

some people might love that music you think is boring and still like it 30 years down, while forgetting what you like.

every argument applied thus far could be used in retrospect against the people arguing them for exactly the same reason.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Nov-10-2008 21:06:

I think the argument is that the current stylistic trend you subscribe to is not going to have the historical resonance that movements like progressive house or IDM had in the 1990s.

I don't know if that means anything- the whole idea behind those Epic House sets was to remember a stylistic trend that has almost been forgotten a decade on. I still think it's great music, but it isn't remembered like early progressive or the IDM scene.


Posted by sljiva on Nov-10-2008 21:27:

Can't really speak in Petran's name, but I think he can't accept the fact that so much good music is being overlooked today, just because people are concentrating too much on this whole mnml/tech scene which is pretty miss-ey these days. I felt that way too some time ago, but I really don't care anymore.

For example let's take that Derek Carr's album which I recommended in another thread. If that album was released 10 or 15 years ago, it would be considered classic these days, simply because it is brilliant and could stand among John Beltran's, B12's or Kirk Degiorgio's best work from that time. Shamely, these days this kind of sound is not in the spotlight anymore (even with techno fans), and a lot of people will not hear it (even if some of us try hard to promote it). But they sure will hear new Radio Slave tune which they'll forget in two months...

You could say it's all about taste again, but I don't agree


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 21:30:

what makes one music good and the other not good?

if you can answer this and back it up with absolute proof you win the internet.

you do not have to agree, the world does not revolve around your tastes.


Posted by sljiva on Nov-10-2008 21:39:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
what makes one music good and the other not good?

if you can answer this and back it up with absolute proof you win the internet.


Yeah righ. You prove me that music from your sets is better than, let's say, epic trance and back it up with absolute proof and I'll never post on this board again. We all talk bullshit and we know it...


Posted by nefardec on Nov-10-2008 21:40:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
Can't really speak in Petran's name, but I think he can't accept the fact that so much good music is being overlooked today, just because people are concentrating too much on this whole mnml/tech scene which is pretty miss-ey these days. I felt that way too some time ago, but I really don't care anymore.

For example let's take that Derek Carr's album which I recommended in another thread. If that album was released 10 or 15 years ago, it would be considered classic these days, simply because it is brilliant and could stand among John Beltran's, B12's or Kirk Degiorgio's best work from that time. Shamely, these days this kind of sound is not in the spotlight anymore (even with techno fans), and a lot of people will not hear it (even if some of us try hard to promote it). But they sure will hear new Radio Slave tune which they'll forget in two months...

You could say it's all about taste again, but I don't agree



i think there's too much fuss about this. good music is good music. everyone knows dance music is 95% shit It's just dance music and doesn't purport to be anything else - except in some cases, and that's troublesome. This is my main complaint with things like epic trance, prog and a lot of deep house. it looks, sounds, and smells like music, but it's not really.


Reminds me of a quote from Sufi Inayat Khan's "Mysticism of Music" where he deplores Jazz.


quote:
In India musicians are now dying out because of lack of appreciation. Those potentates, those Gurus, those teachers of high inspiration who lived in the past, appreciated this music. But even in India people are becoming industrialized and more materialistic, and music is dying. There are very few now of those musicians of former times who would make all those who listened spellbound; they hardly exist any longer. Among millions there are perhaps three or four and they will have vanished in a few years. Maybe one day the Western world will awaken to India's music as now the West is awakening to the poetry of the East, and beginning to appreciate such works as those of Rabindranath Tagore. There will come a time when they will ask for music of that kind too, and then it will not be found, it will be too late. But there is no doubt that if that music, which is magic and which is built on a psychological basis is introduced in the West, it will root out all such things as jazz. People seem to spoil their senses. This music is destroying their delicacy of sense. Thousands every day are dancing to jazz music and they forget the effect it has upon their spirit, upon their mind, upon their delicate senses.

There was a prince of Rampur who wanted to study music with a great teacher. But the teacher knew the character of the prince who was fond of music, and he understood that many musicians would want to show their talents before him. He said, 'I can only teach you on one condition: I do not want to hear any musician who is not an accomplished artist, because your sense of music must not be destroyed; it must be preserved for delicate music, it must be able to appreciate the fine intricacies.'

When the education of the public destroys the delicacy of its musical appreciation, it cannot help the fact that it does not like listening to real music but prefers jazz. Instead of going forward, it is going backward. And if music which is the central theme of the whole human culture is not helping people to go forward, it is a great pity.


http://wahiduddin.net/mv2/II/II_9.htm


Posted by Trance-M on Nov-10-2008 21:52:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
everyone knows dance music is 95% shit


You could say this about all other genres too.

Music is music. Whether it is good depends on how a group of people agrees to judge that...


Posted by elFreak on Nov-10-2008 21:57:

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva
Yeah righ. You prove me that music from your sets is better than, let's say, epic trance and back it up with absolute proof and I'll never post on this board again. We all talk bullshit and we know it...


woooosh.

the point is i am not sitting here telling you it is better than anything, simply my taste. You are the the one making the this music is shit argument.

so why is it shit other than your personal opinion?

quote:
Originally posted by sljiva


You could say it's all about taste again, but I don't agree


this is why i asked for concrete proof that is unbiased of your personal opinion.

you can't prove it

"the world does not revolve around your opinion"


Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.