TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- 2012
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]

Posted by WittyHandle on Nov-17-2009 19:17:

quote:
Originally posted by bananas
i hate john cusack for taking the part in this movie. i love him and he can do so much better:[


I bet it's the biggest paycheck he's ever seen, and they saved a bundle by not casting Nick Cage.

Win win.

For them anyway.

Posted by Lira on Nov-17-2009 19:39:

They could've picked Nicholas Cage!? And 2012, a TV series!?

!

Posted by Clovis on Nov-18-2009 07:31:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
+
Does not compute.


x10032034230

This guy has made fucking end of the world movies and blown billions of dollars his whole fucking career. But they sell. Over and over and over again. I wish telling a great story sold as well...

Posted by EgosXII on Nov-18-2009 08:22:

not hiring nic cage? apparently he owes the tax office 6mil and could go bankrupt, he probably would have taken the role! hahaha

also in insanely high amounts paid to actors..

http://www.theage.com.au/news/enter...8219870760.html

depp's getting 38 mill for the next pirates of the carribean... fair enough if you ask me, they are terrible films...

Posted by Cloudburst on Nov-22-2009 21:44:

this movies was lulz

Posted by Orbital32 on Nov-23-2009 04:47:

I saw this yesterday. It felt like hitler made a movie but instead of using nazis, he used John Cusack. Maybe he did use Nazis then.

this post makes as much sense as the movie.

Posted by EgosXII on Nov-23-2009 05:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Orbital32
I saw this yesterday. It felt like hitler made a movie but instead of using nazis, he used John Cusack. Maybe he did use Nazis then.

this post makes as much sense as the movie.


Posted by woscar on Dec-01-2009 15:05:

Meh. Saw this last weekend, and while cheesy and over the top it wasn't as bad as I expected. Yeah, of course the story was going to be bullshit but the effects were really amazing. Probably the best special effects I've ever seen in a movie. Danny Glover was abysmal.

Posted by Cloudburst on Dec-01-2009 16:03:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar
Meh. Saw this last weekend, and while cheesy and over the top it wasn't as bad as I expected. Yeah, of course the story was going to be bullshit but the effects were really amazing. Probably the best special effects I've ever seen in a movie. Danny Glover was abysmal.


He should have said "I'm too old for this shit" instead of that gay line about his dead wife when that ship came crashing down on him.

Posted by lacksesepsotygh on Dec-01-2009 21:46:

twas awful. i bursted out laughing when the jazz guy phoned his son and held a picture of a gook baby

Posted by RandomGirl on Dec-14-2009 03:01:

quote:
Originally posted by enydo
This movie looks paaaiiinfully terrible. When I saw the preview in theaters it went something like... omg worlds ending, omg no it's not lol let's continue with our daily routine, BOOOMMMMM world starts randomly falling apart, OMG DADDY GET US OUTTA HERE, drive drive drive just barely ahead of the collapse of our fucking planet, OMG DADDY *INSERT WITTY COMMENT YOU WOULDN'T EXPECT A FIVE YEAR OLD TO SAY DURING THE COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD*, drive drive drive drive, world still falling apart, oh my god highway collapse, omg we're gonna die, no we're not, now we're flying flying flying flying world still falling apart but we somehow managed to make it into a plane.

The actors all look really good at yelling and looking concerned.


Yep... that is a perfect summary of the movie.

LOL!

This movie was ridiculous.

EDIT:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar
Meh. Saw this last weekend, and while cheesy and over the top it wasn't as bad as I expected. Yeah, of course the story was going to be bullshit but the effects were really amazing. Probably the best special effects I've ever seen in a movie. Danny Glover was abysmal.


Best special effects?!

What crap ass movies are you watching?

Posted by itsamemario on Dec-14-2009 09:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Theresa
Yep... that is a perfect summary of the movie.

LOL!

This movie was ridiculous.

EDIT:



Best special effects?!

What crap ass movies are you watching?


yeah, nothing spectacular about the special effects at all. looked very cg imo.. and the story was so bad and retarded..

i actually fell asleep while watching the movie, that's how bad the story was. and if you fall asleep while watching a movie then IT'S NOT "so bad it'll become good".

10,000 bc was so bad it became good, i mean LOL, when that old lady "mother nature" or what the fuck her name was,
"transferred" her life-force or whatnot to other chick? LOL..

2012 was the worst movie i've seen this year, and i've seen ALOT of bad movies this year.

Posted by Fledz on Dec-14-2009 09:49:

So what movie would you say has better special effects then?

Posted by itsamemario on Dec-14-2009 12:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
So what movie would you say has better special effects then?


Plan 9 from Outer Space

Posted by mdamon7278 on Dec-14-2009 12:37:

Both the movie the day after tomorrow and 2012 end the same way, view of earth from space showing the world looks like after the destruction

Posted by Lews on Dec-14-2009 12:45:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
Plan 9 from Outer Space


Best god damned movie of all time.

Posted by mdamon7278 on Dec-14-2009 12:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
Best god damned movie of all time.


Dam that is the best, watching it right now

Posted by itsamemario on Dec-14-2009 12:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
Best god damned movie of all time.


not as good as this http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0162538/
but still an awesome runner up.

Posted by Lews on Dec-14-2009 12:57:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
not as good as this http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0162538/
but still an awesome runner up.


Rule 34 holds true, I see.

Posted by floyd741 on Dec-14-2009 13:33:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
10,000 bc


now that's a terrible movie.

like, holy shit

Posted by itsamemario on Dec-14-2009 15:06:

quote:
Originally posted by floyd741
now that's a terrible movie.

like, holy shit


how roland emmerich was allowed to make movies after that is unknown to me.

Posted by Lira on Dec-14-2009 15:13:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
how roland emmerich was allowed to make movies after that is unknown to me.

I think he's only allowed to destroy the world now.

Posted by margarita on Dec-14-2009 17:01:

with such terrible changes in climate...i guess it will be end in 2011http://img.tranceaddict.com/images/icons/new/0509/heartpump.gif

Posted by leph555 on Dec-14-2009 17:25:

fuck that, i am getting mr. putin to adopt me, then me and him are going to set sail

Posted by itsamemario on Dec-14-2009 22:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
So what movie would you say has better special effects then?


what i mean is taht there is absolutely nothing groundbreaking about the special effects. its like.. okay, they look good, but it's not mindblowingly good when compared to other movies this year.
think star wars, when it was released in 77 (or even better, empire strikes back in 81) the special effects were so spectacular, it was like nothing you had ever seen before, and it wasn't JUST the space scenes that were beatifuly made, it was (nearly) everything.

imo special effects haven't really gotten anywhere since the late 90's/early 00's. sure, you've got more polygons in the models, and the materials look better, but the progress from 00-09 has been virtually nonexisting compared to 70-79, or 80-89.


Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.