TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Banksy comes to Toronto?!
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WittyHandle Weakest. argument. ever. |
Fruitless debate aside, "Exit Through The Gift Shop" is a hilarious take on the commodification of street art and points to the ridiculousness of the volume of money that gets thrown at something that - as the film also points out - any shmuck with a stencil, paint roller and a few cans of Krylon is capable of creating.

^^^
absolutely hilarious doc! def worth a watch.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PivotTechno No, I caught that. But you're missing an essential element that your relaxation of said bylaws hinges upon; the part where you've quite narrowly defined what constitutes art (when money has been exchanged betweent the artist and the indivudual who commissioned said art) and what constitutes graffiti (unlawful defacement of property). And so we come full circle to my points that a) you do indeed have control issues and b) that your so-called libertarian views are manufactured solely to conveniently serve Jayx1 and Jayx1 alone. You keep tilting at those windmills, though - I'm sure all those kids from low-income families in Regent Park and other, similar areas of the city are hanging on your every word as to how to rectify this blight on our otherwise spotless metropolis. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 where did i define art as simply being something where money has been exchanged? All i said was that in order for something to be considered art as opposed to vandalism, they must have permission to do it. Also i said that art is subjective and in the eye of the beholder. Please dont put words in my mouth. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 A libertarian tends to believe that an individual has the right to enjoy their private property how they see fit. No different from what I am arguing here. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 So what of the property owner who has worked hard to pay off their property by working for years? Or the small business owner trying to make a buck every day who is now out thousands because some idiot wrote all over the front of their building? Do you not think the selfishness here would be the idiot who has absolutely no responsibility to these properties, who did not work a day in their life to pay for this property, who does not pay tax for it, thinking that they have the right to do anything they want to it? Saying that they dont means you have control issues? LOL! |
Just because i dont agree with something doesnt mean i dont understand it. I understand it perfectly well.
As for enforcement. I am not against law per se. I am against over reaching law. Over reaching law is when the government dictates what you can do with your own property. Over reaching law is when the government decides what you can consume in your own body. Over reaching law is when the police beat and assault you.
Find me a an example of where i have said that laws protecting private property (meaning the owner has a choice as to who and what is on that property) should not exist.
If you look back at my complaints against authority, it usually involves their encroachment onto private property and your right to use it as you see fit. Absolutely no different than what I am stating here.
Again, nice try 
Early Banksy:
jay, so i guess you won't be coming to this then?
http://www.torontograffiti.ca/
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.