TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- No wonder all tracks sound the same nowadays...
Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Oct-12-2010 10:39:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO I am

quote:
Originally posted by kuollutrunkkau5
Does it sound any more ridiculous than a guy trying to pass a hit to a label as his own and succeeding in fooling them?

Actually yes.


Posted by kuollutrunkkau5 on Oct-12-2010 10:42:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO I am

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Actually yes.
I don't know, after seeing what Sony did with that DRM and how corporations generally make a sport of lying.

I find it just as plausible that they simply mixed up the tracks in an administrative goof and bought the man's silence or something.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Oct-12-2010 10:44:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO I am

All right then.


Posted by kuollutrunkkau5 on Oct-12-2010 10:47:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO I am

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
All right then.
Taas susta tulee viimeinen sana. =(


Posted by mistyg on Oct-12-2010 15:47:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NO I am

quote:
Originally posted by kuollutrunkkau5
I don't know, after seeing what Sony did with that DRM and how corporations generally make a sport of lying.

I find it just as plausible that they simply mixed up the tracks in an administrative goof and bought the man's silence or something.


Has he explained or come forth with his proof???No not that I have heard! And why are you so DOWN on labels, what did they do wrong??Give some guy a chance to profit from his music...why is that bad? It is bad because it looks like the guy pulled a fast one but due to the original artist saying hey that is mine..they did what they had to do and correct the mistake....I would say the label showed alot of class!!!What is your problem...jealous or what!!


Posted by Vernon Wanderer on Oct-16-2010 15:53:

..,.,.

Guess what.. There's part two.

Found it on Trancefix...



Posted by Rodri Santos on Oct-16-2010 16:14:

Fucking anjuna they've been charging people for the same track years.


Posted by BeatsAndBeyond on Oct-16-2010 16:43:

This is like saying every trance track that uses an arpeggio pattern sounds the same.

You could create a similar video using any type of music and any type of pattern, so I don't see what the fuss is about.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Oct-16-2010 16:49:

quote:
Originally posted by BeatsAndBeyond
This is like saying every trance track that uses the same arpeggio pattern sounds the same.

Fixed that for you.
quote:
Originally posted by BeatsAndBeyond
You could create a similar video using any type of music and any type of pattern, so I don't see what the fuss is about.

Of course you don't.


Posted by osterzone on Oct-16-2010 17:30:

quote:
Originally posted by BeatsAndBeyond
This is like saying every trance track that uses an arpeggio pattern sounds the same.

You could create a similar video using any type of music and any type of pattern, so I don't see what the fuss is about.

I already mentioned this earlier.

If you wrote out the melodies of all the songs in that video, they're 100% different. It's just that it's a two-note pattern that's being repeated. The stuff focused on in the video is not a melody. Case closed...and that's a fact...write it out on a sheet of paper for the proof.

But in classic TA fashion, the trolls feel threatened about their stupidity, so they pull out webster dictionary references and other garbage to shield themselves


Posted by Vernon Wanderer on Oct-16-2010 17:36:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
I already mentioned this earlier.

If you wrote out the melodies of all the songs in that video, they're 100% different. It's just that it's a two-note pattern that's being repeated. The stuff focused on in the video is not a melody. Case closed...and that's a fact...write it out on a sheet of paper for the proof.

But in classic TA fashion, the trolls feel threatened about their stupidity, so they pull out webster dictionary references and other garbage to shield themselves



What genres do you listen to?


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Oct-16-2010 17:38:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
If you wrote out the melodies of all the songs in that video, they're 100% different.


Please do.


Posted by osterzone on Oct-16-2010 17:40:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Please do.

They are.

I'm talking about the progression of these two-note patterns.

If they were truly similar, you would have every track using the exact same melody with the exact same pitch. They wouldn't look any different on sheet music this way.

You guys complain about how they sound the same, but they're actually not the same.


Posted by Vernon Wanderer on Oct-16-2010 17:45:

Ok, but why are so many producers using the very same PATTERNS? That's the question. Those tracks just don't have enough identity in my opinion.. I'm not trolling, I do like some new trance tracks, but my taste which is fed up with same shit all the time is preventing me from enjoying most releases.


Posted by osterzone on Oct-16-2010 17:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Vernon Wanderer
Ok, but why are so many producers using the very same PATTERNS? That's the question. Those tracks just don't have enough identity in my opinion.. I'm not trolling, I do like some new trance tracks, but my taste which is fed up with same shit all the time is preventing me from enjoying most releases.

They use the same patterns because they're catchy on the ear and sound good.

Temple One is a producer that has built his entire career from this pattern. Every one of his songs has that high-low thing going on with it. You know it's a track by him when you hear that nowadays.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Oct-16-2010 17:47:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
They are.

I'm talking about the progression of these two-note patterns.


Please write out those different melodies to show me that they are 100% different.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Oct-16-2010 17:50:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
You guys complain about how they sound the same, but they're actually not the same.

Sounding the same and being the same are two different things.

Even the title of the video does not claim the melodies to be the same, but similar.


Posted by osterzone on Oct-16-2010 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Please write out those different melodies to show me that they are 100% different.

I don't need to...listen to them yourself.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Oct-16-2010 17:55:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
I don't need to...listen to them yourself.


I do not have relative pitch, I cannot tell you what a note is by hearing it in a melody. So I want you to provide this proof:

quote:
Case closed...and that's a fact...write it out on a sheet of paper for the proof.


Posted by pozz on Oct-16-2010 17:57:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
They are.

I'm talking about the progression of these two-note patterns.

If they were truly similar, you would have every track using the exact same melody with the exact same pitch. They wouldn't look any different on sheet music this way.

You guys complain about how they sound the same, but they're actually not the same.


in Western music theory, there is something called "shape". it refers to how a piece of music develops over time. these tracks all have the same shape. sometimes even matching each other second for second.

on a sheet of music these would look even more similar than just listening. why? because all the little melodies surrounding the main melodic theme would look like they are supporting it -- like they are built around it. this is called "variations on a theme" a term which i'm sure you have heard before. all these tracks are "variations on a theme".

and this isnt saying the same thing as "trance has the same kick-hihat-clap-hihat percussion for ever song". the same fooking central theme around which the songs are built is used in these 50 fooking tracks.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Oct-16-2010 17:57:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
They use the same patterns because they're catchy on the ear and sound good.

They use the same pattern because they're trying to capitalize on a trendy sound instead of having any artistic integrity.


Posted by Rodri Santos on Oct-16-2010 18:05:

Using the same arpeggio is synthom of lack of creativity, but well using the same arpeggio with different melody and chords could be enjoyable.

When all the tracks have the same melody or very very similar is booring. God bless this is mostly anjuna cancer and there's still some good trance being released.

But day by day i'm less into uplifting and more into tech, the subgenre is dying.


Posted by osterzone on Oct-16-2010 18:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Rodri Santos
Using the same arpeggio is synthom of lack of creativity, but well using the same arpeggio with different melody and chords could be enjoyable.

When all the tracks have the same melody or very very similar is booring. God bless this is mostly anjuna cancer and there's still some good trance being released.

But day by day i'm less into uplifting and more into tech, the subgenre is dying.

To me tech-trance is ten times more boring than uplifting trance...I can't stand the croaking sounds they stuff into those tracks.


Posted by osterzone on Oct-16-2010 18:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
They use the same pattern because they're trying to capitalize on a trendy sound instead of having any artistic integrity.

How is it trendy? Who is deciding that?


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Oct-16-2010 18:33:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
How is it trendy? Who is deciding that?

Are you serious?


Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.