TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- "200X"/"classic" Updates...
Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »


Posted by sandstorm03 on May-16-2005 19:14:

quote:
Originally posted by ONION
half the tunes listed arent even classics : /


"200X"/


Posted by ONION on May-16-2005 19:26:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
"200X"/


exactly


Posted by Psiweaver on May-16-2005 22:53:

So why don't you quite whining about it and actually do something to fix the problem ie start producing etc. You guys are such whiners you just bitch and moan all day but never really get around to actually doing anything to improve what the problems are.


Posted by ONION on May-17-2005 00:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Psiweaver
So why don't you quite whining about it and actually do something to fix the problem ie start producing etc. You guys are such whiners you just bitch and moan all day but never really get around to actually doing anything to improve what the problems are.


actually i do produce my own stuff...

secondly my last moan for the day will be - its quit not quite

kthxbi ^_____^


Posted by Blue. on May-17-2005 01:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Psiweaver
So why don't you quite whining about it and actually do something to fix the problem ie start producing etc. You guys are such whiners you just bitch and moan all day but never really get around to actually doing anything to improve what the problems are.


The whole "why don't you do something better" argument is the weakest of all arguments unless someone claims that they could do better.


Posted by sandstorm03 on May-17-2005 01:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Psiweaver
So why don't you quite whining about it and actually do something to fix the problem ie start producing etc. You guys are such whiners you just bitch and moan all day but never really get around to actually doing anything to improve what the problems are.



actually im just making a list of all the updated tracks. But how the hell am I supposed to improve on classic tracks? Shit none of the producers now have done a good job.


The best way to solve the problem is not buy any of their tracks.


Posted by sandstorm03 on May-30-2005 15:05:

Moonman - Galaxia 2005


Posted by Blue. on May-30-2005 20:49:

System F - Cry 2005 remixes


Posted by sandstorm03 on Jun-09-2005 17:57:

MEDWAY The Bassline Track 2005
The Bassline Track (Luke Chable mix)
The Bassline Track (Jiva Road Rage mix)

chable mix


Posted by TranceSpeeder on Jun-09-2005 20:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj_GtR
i can't believe binary finary - 2005 exists....
enough...


i just found out today!


Posted by MarathonMan on Jun-10-2005 12:07:

Mauro Picotto - Lizard (2012 remake) (DJ n00b with a cracked copy of Fruity Loops Remix)


Posted by Sand Leaper on Jun-14-2005 01:01:

Digital Express - The Club (2005 Remixes)

The Oliver Shine remix sounds rather good though. http://mp3.juno.co.uk/MP3/SF181965-01-01-01.mp3


Posted by sandstorm03 on Aug-10-2005 17:32:

Out Of The Past - Mystery


Posted by Ghostface on Aug-11-2005 00:49:

Re: "200X"/"classic" Updates...

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03

not funny any more

Agreed. Definitely beyond a joke.


Posted by Nostalgic on Aug-11-2005 04:40:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
Moonman - Galaxia 2005


this one's actually quality


Posted by sandstorm03 on Aug-11-2005 04:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Erotic Buddha
this one's actually quality


cause ferry changed the intro??? plz....


Posted by raydn on Aug-11-2005 10:17:

evolution - ayla (andy whitby serge & withenshaw remix)


Posted by raydn on Aug-12-2005 12:41:

Oh look another

Neon Lights / Masif DJs [Steve Hill vs D10 / D10 Remixs] :: Fine Day / Cafe De Mar :: Masif

http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/s...ategory=TR@ND=0


Posted by sleepydragon on Aug-12-2005 12:52:

quote:
Originally posted by raydn
Oh look another

Neon Lights / Masif DJs [Steve Hill vs D10 / D10 Remixs] :: Fine Day / Cafe De Mar :: Masif

http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/s...ategory=TR@ND=0


some of those neon lights productions r quite good though
d10 - binary harder is quite good aswell


Posted by Lionhead on Aug-12-2005 17:30:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
This truly shows the lack of creativity amongst the scene as of late. Producers are too afraid to push the boundaries that have been set over the past seven years. Look at all of the upcoming producers that have been aired on ASOT and played by many DJs lately and you'll notice that all of their tunes have the same format as before; intro, build-up, breakdown, and end, complete with the same kicks and synths that we've heard time and time again.

Record labels who own the rights to these songs see them as easy cash-ins, as people who are new to the scene generally don't know of the older originals, and thus will cream their pants as they spend money on less-than-mediocre remakes.

What happened to originality? What happened to producers telling labels, "No, I wont do a 2005 Remix. I want to try something new"? Why are people so afraid to do something that hasn't be done, to actually use their brain?

Maybe they just don't want to? Perhaps Trance has reached the point where it's popular enough to warrant "wanting to be famous" as an excuse for starting to produce. Maybe new producers just want to be noticed, and will only produce what sounds like ASOT in a vain attempt to be recognized.

I dunno. In any case, these need to stop, and they need to stop now. They're far beyond the point of pathetic.


Plus fucking one.


Posted by Luke Cartwright on Aug-12-2005 19:20:

I don't really have a problem with new remixes because if a producer likes a track alot they can do what they want with it, for all we know it could even be there favourite track of all time. Who knows? Everybody has a favourite song even djs believe it or not and I think alot of producers starting out will agree that the first track/remix they made was of their favourite song.

IMO they are entitled to do there own interpritation of it because 1: It could fit more into the style of the sets they play where as the original doesn't 2: They want a faster version of the original, hence the hard house versions etc.. 3: They really like elements of the original but not all of it. Running out of examples but you get what I mean.

Also I can see why people say producers are running out of ideas but I don't get why people say so and so have killed a classic, not trying to cause an argument but the original is not going anywhere is it

If I don't like a "2005 remix" or whatever it is called I won't buy it or even bother listening to it again if I can help it, simple as that. I will continue to use my favourite version track be it new or old.


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2005 20:03:

was going thro a random old gc cd earlier & came across the BeatPusher rmx of pulser- cloudwalking. Have to say this is an exception to the general rule as it's superb


Posted by sleepydragon on Aug-12-2005 21:14:

theres a new remix of insomnia just been made
faithless - insomnia (lee haslam mix)

www.leehaslam.com/


Posted by skip on Aug-12-2005 21:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
was going thro a random old gc cd earlier & came across the BeatPusher rmx of pulser- cloudwalking. Have to say this is an exception to the general rule as it's superb


IMO it's a HORRIBLE rape of a great classic! but i loved beat pusher's murto (not the horrible vocal versions though) and rokki (rokki especially, which is such a great tune yet no one seems to know it)


quote:
Originally posted by sleepydragon
theres a new remix of insomnia just been made
faithless - insomnia (lee haslam mix)

www.leehaslam.com/



sasha has made a remix too and afaik it's new. faithless is gonna cash in properly on their old tracks now afaik and release more of these updated versions.


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2005 21:58:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
IMO it's a HORRIBLE rape of a great classic! but i loved beat pusher's murto (not the horrible vocal versions though) and rokki (rokki especially, which is such a great tune yet no one seems to know it)


I think its really tasteful as I said, I can listen to it and not feel like the original mixes have been cheapened at all.


Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.