TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- USA - Texas & S. Central USA
-- 09.12.2007: John Digweed @ Club Rio - SA
Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by maddraver btw..with a shitty sound system and trance opening, thats probably the last time san antonio will ever see digweed.  |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by davemolina LOL Money talks. We'll see him again. |
I don't see what's stupid. If someone pays him to come back he will come back.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by progressiveMOJO if you think Digweed has trouble finding places willing to pay him you're more stupid than I ever imagined. |
i just think if it was that bad of a night he certainly noticed it.
if i was his manager or digweed himself i wouldnt come back to the same venue. trance? shitty sound?. no bueno ! 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by maddraver i just think if it was that bad of a night he certainly noticed it. if i was his manager or digweed himself i wouldnt come back to the same venue. trance? shitty sound?. no bueno ! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by davemolina He showed up mid-way through my set so he never heard the guy that played vocal trance before me. He gave me a couple "thumbs ups" during the end of my set and thanked me for opening correctly, so I doubt that was an issue. The sound wasn't crisp, but wasn't horrific either. I think he was just more annoyed at the mixer setup than anything. Nothing happened to write off a whole city. |
Dude, I feel you on that. I feel bad for SA...just for different reasons.
...like not having any professional sports teams. I know...
On the day we finally get one, I hope Fred McGriff is their coach.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by inconspicuous ...like not having any professional sports teams. I know... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by davemolina On the day we finally get one, I hope Fred McGriff's hat is their coach. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild You forgot the greatest contemporary NBA dynasty. |
I understand your jealousy.
4/9 = .44
6/8 = .75
if you take away the year Jordan wasn't there, you get .86. If you consider the fact that he only came back the following year for the last 17 games, you get 1.00. Throw in the fact that your first one was in a strike-shortened season, and you have .33 vs. 1.00. Yeah, I'm so jealous.
Take your 'dynasty' talk somewhere else. 3 titles in 8 full seasons. Whoopdy do.
also, hijack successful.
Yeah and you were like 5 years old when that happened? Oh and we are still not done. Timmy has a few left in him and the Bulls have long since turned to shit.
The dynasty talk stays and don't tell me you're not jealous because you most definitely are. Like I said. I understand.
I love how every Rockets fan immediately goes to the "If Jordan wasn't there" argument...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by davemolina Dates will continue to be purchased in lots for a large sum of money and then distributed to the region somewhat evenly between SA and Austin (as well as Houston, Dallas, New Orleans, etc). Digweed goes where he's told. Do you ever get tired of being the forum douchebag? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djjonas |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Yeah and you were like 5 years old when that happened? Oh and we are still not done. Timmy has a few left in him and the Bulls have long since turned to shit. The dynasty talk stays and don't tell me you're not jealous because you most definitely are. Like I said. I understand. |
...and I'm not at all jealous of people who root for a team that relies solely on the wife of its above-average point guard for tv ratings.
This never was about the Bulls w/MJ. This is about the Spurs being the best dynasty at the moment. You trying to deny they are even a team seems to say you're jealous that your team isn't playing so well right now. I fail to see why the ratings matter. But I do understand how it would be boring to watch your team lose over and over for a decade to a team coming from one of the smallest media markets.
Can I yell out "Burn!!!" right now or should I wait till later?
no, the media market has nothing to do with it. I know you don't frequent the sports forum, but it's full of my rants about the BS from ESPN and others about just covering the teams they care about.
I'm not jealous of anybody, because the Bulls are winning now & it's exciting to watch. I was merely referring to:
1. The Spurs are NOT a dynasty. 'Dynasty' implies domination & a clear, indisputable difference between something or someone and all others. When you never even win twice in a row, you can not be considered a 'dynasty.' No exceptions.
2. They're boring to watch. I'm all for fundamentals, but the fact is that it's just not exciting at all when there's no flare, no ups or downs, & no emotion. It's like watching a really tall WNBA team, with a designated flopper & another dirty player thrown in for good measure.
...and again, you're not paying attention if you think I'm mad that my team is losing. Look at the standings, & watch a couple games. Ironically, there is potential for a dynasty on that roster, as it's comprised of a bunch of very young, very good players who have nothing but upside, and are already winning consistently.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.