TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Chicago panoramas and other shots (LOTS)
Pages (21): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »

nikons are almost non present in the clubs over here...

canon always had cleaner pics at higher iso till not too long ago, i guess nobody noticed that...

what excites me the most are the video capabilities!!!

Imagine being able to use your lense and ISO settings!!

Check those clips out (scroll down)

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/eos5dm2/02.html#01

quote:

Originally posted by malek nikons are almost non present in the clubs over here... canon always had cleaner pics at higher iso till not too long ago, i guess nobody noticed that...

Exact same scenario here too. All I see are Canons. I see a very few Olympus, but the ones that aren't using Canons are usually using the lowest dslr-like camera they can find.

5DMKII vs D700

http://www.flickr.com/photos/erikfive

wow.

quote:

Originally posted by delobbo 5DMKII vs D700 http://www.flickr.com/photos/erikfive wow.

those aren't good test shots, the pics aren't even the same, canon appears to be superior... but it's hard to tell from those shots.

Thanks for the link.

quote:

Originally posted by malek those aren't good test shots, the pics aren't even the same, canon appears to be superior... but it's hard to tell from those shots. Thanks for the link.

They aren't the best. It's still early and we'll have to wait a bit for some proper testing. But (assuming the info is correct) the Nikon shots are RAW, and the Canon is JPG. Can you make a prediction about what the Canon's shots would look like in RAW?

quote:

Originally posted by delobbo They aren't the best. It's still early and we'll have to wait a bit for some proper testing. But (assuming the info is correct) the Nikon shots are RAW, and the Canon is JPG. Can you make a prediction about what the Canon's shots would look like in RAW?

eagrly waiting the full blown dpreview.com review to see the real difference.

Do you shoot raw in clubs anyways?

quote:

Originally posted by malek eagrly waiting the full blown dpreview.com review to see the real difference. Do you shoot raw in clubs anyways?

me = waiting too.

I did it for about 2 months in late 2007 and I liked the results, but, I decided the added effort was not needed for the shots I was doing. They are more "casual" shots. I now consistently shoot at the clubs in JPG fine, maximum size.

if I get the MKII I see myself shooting in the 10MP sRAW mode..

it looks like this has quietly turned into an unofficial 5DMKII thread. SWEET!!!!!!

check this out:

iso 25600, unprocessed
http://www.flickr.com/photos/erikfive/2868119820/
Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Exposure: 1/8000 sec
Aperture: f/1.4
Focal Length: 35 mm

GAME OVER!

ouch... raped.

Thats some crazy shit right there!!! shooting at 1/8000 inside!!!!!!!!!!!1

taking pics while it films?!!??!?!

holy cow.. thats news to me. god this thing is gonna be nuts at the clubs.. like this:

ok the guy in the above video says it differently - and may be wrong - he says it allows photographers to "take still images while they're still filming in high definition". The following PC World says otherwise. This says that you can take a still picture quickly without having to switch modes. It will stop the video to take the picture. We'll have to see how this pans out as more info becomes available.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/1511...tml?tk=rss_news

quote:

Now, Canon's 5D Mark II transforms the landscape further by capturing 30 frames per second MPEG-4 video at 1920 by 1080p resolution. Canon says you can capture up to 12 minutes of high-def video with monoaural sound (approximately 4GB) or 29 minutes, 59 seconds of standard definition video. You can take a picture while recording a movie; the video stops while you snap a still, then it resumes recording. In addition to the built-in mono microphone, you can add an external stereo microphone. A Mini-HDMI port facilitates outputting video directly from the camera to an HDTV.

god technology is crazy...now imagine what cameras will be like in +10 or +25 years.

just insane

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Exposure: 0.02 sec (1/50)
Aperture: f/6.3
Focal Length: 35 mm
ISO Speed: 4000
Exposure Bias: 1 EV

ISO 4000

where's the noise??? ALL TOO CRAZY!!!!

seriously I was totally not expecting BETTER high iso than the D700.. and possibly even the D3..

quote:

Originally posted by delobbo ISO 4000 where's the noise??? ALL TOO CRAZY!!!! seriously I was totally not expecting BETTER high iso than the D700.. and possibly even the D3..

that's unpossible!
are you sure its not 400 ?

i just opened this thread for the first time. those pics on the first page are truely amazing. great job.

what program are you using for your hdr?
ive been prone to photomatix but find i still get that glow around objects.

what is everyone elses preferences on hdr programs?

quote:

Originally posted by zack3082 what program are you using for your hdr? ive been prone to photomatix but find i still get that glow around objects. what is everyone elses preferences on hdr programs?

page 2

quote:

Originally posted by zack3082 what program are you using for your hdr? ive been prone to photomatix but find i still get that glow around objects. what is everyone elses preferences on hdr programs?

delobo uses Adobe Lightroom.

just heard the 50D has better high ISO performance than the D300.. had no idea it was that good. that is huge improvement.

quote:

Originally posted by zack3082 what program are you using for your hdr? ive been prone to photomatix but find i still get that glow around objects. what is everyone elses preferences on hdr programs?

Photomatix for HDR. I've recently heard Photoshop CS3 does a much better job (mainly, less noise). Going to try that next.

I don't really have a problem with Photomatix though, it does everything I need it to. Regarding the "glow".. you most likely should set Light Smoothing to the far right or the 2nd to far right setting. Try that out.

I posted a sample of a shot done in Lightroom (not HDR) - used to use that a lot, not really that much anymore.

quote:

Originally posted by delobbo just heard the 50D has better high ISO performance than the D300.. had no idea it was that good. that is huge improvement.

do you mean the 5d not the 50d?

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel do you mean the 5d not the 50d?

no I mean the 50D.. just mentioning it because we had been talking about it earlier.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.