Small earth is SMALL!!! - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Small earth is SMALL!!!
Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

Posted by stren on Sep-05-2009 08:45:

Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Sep-05-2009 11:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
The ability of our intellect to make an attempt to understand the mechanics of the Universe and its ability to make us realize our physical insignificance, itself, should make us feel awesome about ourselves and our place in this universe.

LOL, please. Convince me.

Posted by Lira on Sep-05-2009 16:39:

"What is a sin? To sin, is to look at her nose...
... and thus fall from grace"

The Phenomenology of Human Bosom

At each response the sacred rite requires. From her full bosom bursts the unbidden sigh. A strange mysterious awe the scene inspires, and on her lips the trembling accents die - Rousseau

The sublime surrounds us throughout our lives, and leaves us with nothing but awe and wonder. How can we be so insignificant in the greater scheme of things, yet so relevant to our own lives? How can life be so short, yet so full of experiences? And, how can something that's present in half of the world's population be so phenomenal? My lingering belief in the absolute draws me to the natural world - the naturally absolute awesomeness of the human breast.

"Breasts, breasts, breasts", I say. No other word in the English language sounds so poetic, on the face of its power. You first close your lips tightly and then, in an explosion, let your tongue roll, and open your mouth with a smile. Then, in a sibilant expression of joy, you gently touch your teeth and then let go, as if reaching for the great object of desire - and then forgoing the pleasure. For, the boob amazes not just the intellect, but a man's will in its entirety.

Here I'd like to address the phenomenology of the human bosom, which makes the other half of the planet ever so happy. To burst with joy is to have a joyful bust available, after all. However, there are a few remarks I'd like to make lest we forget what we're aiming for. That is, the object of our amazement.

"Phenomenology" is a word laden with meaning, harking back to Husserl's phenomenological movement (and, before that, Hegel's phenomenology of the spirit). This is not what it's meant here, however. I'm starting from the premise that tits are phenomenal. And, as phenomena, they must be seen through that light.

More than a handful is a blessing (and less than a handful is still game). It need not fit the physical limits of the human hand, for it's infinite in the intellect. All men, regardless of their mental capacities, are drawn to the same conclusion: that tits are awesome.

Women should not feel objectified about this stupefaction or ours: to be passionate about a pair of breasts is to bestow upon their owner reverence and respect, all for the greatness of her natural endowment.

To the religious man, a magnificent pair of boobs is a proof that there is a God. To the heathen, it's the opportunity to also grasp our role in History as natural entities, marooned in a small spit of sand, having no one but ourselves to turn to. To the pious, it's God's way of greeting us (so you know what's up). To the sceptic, it's miraculous how these exocrine glands, enlarged and modified sweat glands, may become the recipient of so much admiration, as it blithely bounces back and forth in a rather empty life.

It's no coincidence that, in a thread about the universe and its wonders, boobs have been mentioned. If there's a God, she's got breasts, for she's perfect. That's the truth I'm ready to believe in.

Posted by Omega_M on Sep-05-2009 16:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
LOL, please. Convince me.

Carl Sagan's pale blue dot should support the first part of my statement. As for the other, until we find extra-terrestrial superior civilizations, we should consider ourselves to be the god damn winners in this universe.

Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-05-2009 17:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira

"What is a sin? To sin, is to look at her nose...
... and thus fall from grace"

The Phenomenology of Human Bosom

At each response the sacred rite requires. From her full bosom bursts the unbidden sigh. A strange mysterious awe the scene inspires, and on her lips the trembling accents die - Rousseau

The sublime surrounds us throughout our lives, and leaves us with nothing but awe and wonder. How can we be so insignificant in the greater scheme of things, yet so relevant to our own lives? How can life be so short, yet so full of experiences? And, how can something that's present in half of the world's population be so phenomenal? My lingering belief in the absolute draws me to the natural world - the naturally absolute awesomeness of the human breast.

"Breasts, breasts, breasts", I say. No other word in the English language sounds so poetic, on the face of its power. You first close your lips tightly and then, in an explosion, let your tongue roll, and open your mouth with a smile. Then, in a sibilant expression of joy, you gently touch your teeth and then let go, as if reaching for the great object of desire - and then forgoing the pleasure. For, the boob amazes not just the intellect, but a man's will in its entirety.

Here I'd like to address the phenomenology of the human bosom, which makes the other half of the planet ever so happy. To burst with joy is to have a joyful bust available, after all. However, there are a few remarks I'd like to make lest we forget what we're aiming for. That is, the object of our amazement.

"Phenomenology" is a word laden with meaning, harking back to Husserl's phenomenological movement (and, before that, Hegel's phenomenology of the spirit). This is not what it's meant here, however. I'm starting from the premise that tits are phenomenal. And, as phenomena, they must be seen through that light.

More than a handful is a blessing (and less than a handful is still game). It need not fit the physical limits of the human hand, for it's infinite in the intellect. All men, regardless of their mental capacities, are drawn to the same conclusion: that tits are awesome.

Women should not feel objectified about this stupefaction or ours: to be passionate about a pair of breasts is to bestow upon their owner reverence and respect, all for the greatness of her natural endowment.

To the religious man, a magnificent pair of boobs is a proof that there is a God. To the heathen, it's the opportunity to also grasp our role in History as natural entities, marooned in a small spit of sand, having no one but ourselves to turn to. To the pious, it's God's way of greeting us (so you know what's up). To the sceptic, it's miraculous how these exocrine glands, enlarged and modified sweat glands, may become the recipient of so much admiration, as it blithely bounces back and forth in a rather empty life.

It's no coincidence that, in a thread about the universe and its wonders, boobs have been mentioned. If there's a God, she's got breasts, for she's perfect. That's the truth I'm ready to believe in.

she got a breast reduction btw lol

Posted by Lira on Sep-05-2009 17:23:

^^^

If I ever founded a religion, breast reduction would be one of the two capital sins.

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
Carl Sagan's pale blue dot should support the first part of my statement. As for the other, until we find extra-terrestrial superior civilizations, we should consider ourselves to be the god damn winners in this universe.

What the hell, Michael!? Sagan, Schmagan! We've got bouncy perky boobs to ogle down here, that fact alone makes us winners by default!

Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-05-2009 17:30:

please your ruining this thread lira..

i have posts which i want repsonses from 2 pages back now ..

please jerk off and come back when your ready lol

Posted by Capitalizt on Feb-12-2010 10:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
all this sounds fascinating.. I always wanted to know how do they actually figure out how wide and far away planets or stars are with just a telescope?
wouldnt you lose depth perception when your looking at something so far away. what is the frame of reference?

Im not very knowledged in this subject so maybe someone could explain it in basic terms.

This guy explains it in basic terms..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

I forget where in the lecture he talks about distance but the whole thing is fascinating so you'll probably want to watch.

P.S. I'm bumping this thread cuz I got a chain email that reminded me of it..and also to give you your response.

Posted by stren on Feb-12-2010 10:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
This guy explains it in basic terms..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

I forget where in the lecture he talks about distance but the whole thing is fascinating so you'll probably want to watch.

P.S. I'm bumping this thread cuz I got a chain email that reminded me of it..and also to give you your response.

Yeah, its been posted before. Great lecture by Krauss though

the answer to Karim's question is @ 13 mins

Posted by Capitalizt on Feb-12-2010 11:27:

I love the pic at 15:50 The thought of viewing an entire galaxy at once still amazes me..

I googled and found a bunch more images of supernovas only up close and personal. Here is what they look like after the initial "flash" disappears..

This shit is awesome.

Posted by yukii on Feb-12-2010 16:02:

those pictures are gorgeous

Posted by saluyamo on Feb-13-2010 00:49:

Posted by Lews on Feb-13-2010 01:35:

Read the Bill Bryson book A Short History of Nearly Everything, it's just amazing if you want to know tons of facts about space and how scientists know what they know. Was a really informative and fun read

Posted by Lews on Feb-13-2010 01:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
Carl Sagan's pale blue dot should support the first part of my statement. As for the other, until we find extra-terrestrial superior civilizations, we should consider ourselves to be the god damn winners in this universe.

The pale blue dot was showing how small and insignificant we are.

Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]