TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- this is now a thread about circumcision.
Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Aug-05-2011 19:45:

It was because he couldn't afford botox with 2 lives and it was the cheapest form of wrinkle control available.


Posted by justin on Aug-05-2011 19:50:

what? I can't read you. taking you off ignore, hold on.


Posted by VDub on Aug-05-2011 20:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
It was because he couldn't afford botox with 2 lives and it was the cheapest form of wrinkle control available.


Ahh memories of the best thread in TA history...


Posted by Spam on Aug-05-2011 23:43:

quote:
Originally posted by VDub
Dude!!

When the cock is hard, the foreskin is pulled back, so how could it POSSIBLY raise your chances of getting AIDS from unprotected sex???


I'm only going to respond to this because the answer to your question was included in the article that PKC posted.

"The theory behind the benefits of circumcision is that the inner foreskin is an easy entry point for HIV. It is rich in so-called Langerhans cells, tissue that the AIDS virus easily latches on to and penetrates."

I don't really hold an opinion one way or another, I was only making a quick couple of posts to point out that studies have made the claim that circumcision can reduce your chances of contracting STD's. So far, only one poster has actually responded to that information, and he did it without name calling or being a complete tool like you and Lunar, and his information and counter-points (questioning the methods of the study) have been noted.


Posted by OrangestO on Aug-05-2011 23:57:

I never see dudes in porn with uncircumcised dicks, so women must like it like that.

Makes sense enough to me.


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Aug-06-2011 00:03:

quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
I never see dudes in porn with uncircumcised dicks, so women must like it like that.

Makes sense enough to me.



All women do ass to mouth too. And love to Lez off with their best mate and lick your dick once it's been inside her.

YOU FUCKING SPASTIC.


Posted by OrangestO on Aug-06-2011 00:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7
All women do ass to mouth too. And love to Lez off with their best mate and lick your dick once it's been inside her.

YOU FUCKING SPASTIC.


You mad.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Aug-06-2011 00:32:

I can't wait to lose my virginity...stupid foreskin.


Posted by EgosXII on Aug-06-2011 00:37:

quote:
Originally posted by VDub


Speaking on getting it done later in life, isn't it a much bigger, more risky deal??


Yeah its substantially more serious because veins and other things grow into it which aren't there when you're a kid...


quote:
Originally posted by Spam
I'm only going to respond to this because the answer to your question was included in the article that PKC posted.

"The theory behind the benefits of circumcision is that the inner foreskin is an easy entry point for HIV. It is rich in so-called Langerhans cells, tissue that the AIDS virus easily latches on to and penetrates."

I don't really hold an opinion one way or another, I was only making a quick couple of posts to point out that studies have made the claim that circumcision can reduce your chances of contracting STD's. So far, only one poster has actually responded to that information, and he did it without name calling or being a complete tool like you and Lunar, and his information and counter-points (questioning the methods of the study) have been noted.


The main point is there are so many confounding variables in any study making claims like that that the conclusion becomes useless...


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Aug-06-2011 00:47:



Lunar Phase 7 on the left @ 1:15


Posted by Lira on Aug-06-2011 00:55:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
The main point is there are so many confounding variables in any study making claims like that that the conclusion becomes useless...

Useless? I bet you never used it to prove you're right on the internet!


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Aug-06-2011 04:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
Circumcision is not evil, but lets face it 98% (i can invent numbers too...look deeper into those studies to both pkc and spam ) of the time it is for cosmetic/theological reasons.


nah, like i said, i don't care either way. and im certainly not suggesting that data as a support for circumcision. just pointing out that there are a few studies that posit links between circumcision and AIDS dodging. im all about the facts, yo.


Posted by EgosXII on Aug-06-2011 05:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Useless? I bet you never used it to prove you're right on the internet!


Excuse ME, sir. I am a philosopher and would never stoop to using base 'facts' in an argument!


Posted by Lira on Aug-06-2011 05:17:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
Excuse ME, sir. I am a philosopher and would never stoop to using base 'facts' in an argument!


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Aug-06-2011 05:20:

quote:
Originally posted by EgosXII
Excuse ME, sir. I am a philosopher and would never stoop to using base 'facts' in an argument!


weren't you a creationist like 5 months ago?


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Aug-06-2011 05:41:

I wonder what the mean time between circumcision threads is and how I could divide that up so that I could find the minimum amount of time needed to drastically OT a thread by randomly posting something about circumcision, even if its, like i said drastically off topic.


Posted by Sushipunk on Aug-06-2011 05:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
I wonder what the mean time between circumcision threads is and how I could divide that up so that I could find the minimum amount of time needed to drastically OT a thread by randomly posting something about circumcision, even if its, like i said drastically off topic.





Posted by FuzzQi on Aug-06-2011 08:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
I wonder what the mean time between circumcision threads is and how I could divide that up so that I could find the minimum amount of time needed to drastically OT a thread by randomly posting something about circumcision, even if its, like i said drastically off topic.


To put things in perspective, I came here because I like trance

I fucking love trance


Posted by EgosXII on Aug-06-2011 09:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
weren't you a creationist like 5 months ago?


Pretty sure you're the only one who thought that


Posted by VDub on Aug-06-2011 12:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Spam

and he did it without name calling or being a complete tool like you and Lunar,


Little contradictory isn't it??


And only a tool would give any weight to that ridiculous study...


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Aug-06-2011 12:52:

hey vdub, want to see a pic of my dingle? everyone else has.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Aug-06-2011 17:23:

me gusta


Posted by Sushipunk on Aug-06-2011 22:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
hey vdub, want to see a pic of my dingle? everyone else has.


It's true


Posted by VDub on Aug-06-2011 22:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
hey vdub, want to see a pic of my dingle? everyone else has.


I have as well...

I was curious about the condition so I did a bit of research...


Posted by Zharen on Aug-07-2011 09:28:

Re: this is now a thread about circumcision.

quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
"Then Abraham took Ish'mael his son and all the slaves born in his house or bought with his money, every male among the men of Abraham's house, and he circumcised the flesh of their foreskins that very day, as God said to him" (Gen. 17:23)

That very day Abraham and his son Ish'mael were circumcised (Gen 17:26)


Hmm, I find it interesting that a man of God owned slaves, to remove their foreskins as he wished.


Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.