TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- Robert Nickson - Spiral
Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 »
MK-S vs. Nickson - Don't Send The Letter!!!
but anyways...
Rob: congrats on your huge success. You definitely a producer on the rise.
Hopefully one day my own track 'A Leo Lost' will get some attention... when I finish the damn thing.
Pretty good tune. Nice lush sound to it.
Im not saying this too much, but this track really owns me!!
The kick is just so freakin' awesome and those synths oooooooooooh 
What track/remix is gonna be at the flipside btw?
doublepost
doubledoublepost fs
and no im not asking for attention 
| quote: |
| What track/remix is gonna be at the flipside btw? |
Very well produced track, not one that will stick with me all year however,
but the pads sound like a rip off of Darren Tate vs Jono Grant - Noccy Creatures 
I don't think they are ripped off because both tunes sound totally different imo, even though their melodies might be pretty much the same....
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Shade on Grey Maybe MK-S remix? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Gotcha85 I don't think they are ripped off because both tunes sound totally different imo, even though their melodies might be pretty much the same.... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Shade on Grey Maybe MK-S remix? |
mk-s remix is a blast!!!
when it's gonna be released (if not already)?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jocker mk-s remix is a blast!!! when it's gonna be released (if not already)? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by raditz according to the upcoming releases it will be out tomorrow (today?) March 1st |
Robert Nickson - Spiral (Original)
That's a real trance track that you couldn't miss in your collection of records
If you didn't hear it yet, and can only say 1 thing: 
LISTEN IT AS FAST AS YOU CAN!!!
Re: Robert Nickson - Spiral (Original)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by NoisyNeil LISTEN IT AS FAST AS YOU CAN!!! |
haha, sorry I meant that you have to listen it as soon as possible 
Im loving robert nickson's works including this
Only-DJs has this today, so Chem and the others should be getting it soon...
the MK-S Remix is amazing
| quote: |
| Originally posted by State of Matter Hmmm. Threw the robert nickson - spiral melody and the darren tate vs jono grant - nocturnal creatures melody on a pad. Compare: http://www.angelfire.lycos.com/elec...tter/spiral.mp3 http://www.angelfire.lycos.com/elec...l_creatures.mp3 Im not casting stones, just making observations. Robert's a talented producer, it mighta just been a coincidence. The other synth melody sounds almost exactly the same too, as does the synth sound. |
| quote: |
If someone writes a melody and it gets published, the copyright in that idea belongs to the publisher. If someone else copies the melody it is an infringement of copyright. Claiming you never heard the original is no defence in law. So coincidence or otherwise, if it sounds like someone else's song you are duty bound to give credit (written and financial) to the copyright owner. If you look at the writing credits of Matt Darey's Beautiful you'll see the names Jones and Simmons, the coiners of the phrase "You are beautiful within, you are beautiful without" which Matt knicked. And he was caught red handed. |
| quote: |
In music law, the only real consideration is the lead melody (or "top line")and lyrics. In the case of an instrumental trance track, you are generally looking at the main riff section, the theme of the song. A part that gives the song its true identity. Counter melodies don't normally count. If the top line of this is the similar to something else, then you're in trouble, no matter what chords you have underneath. A musicologist may begin to take into consideration genre to bolster their argument. For example, it would be a little easier to bring a case against one trance track copying another trance track than a rock track copying a trance track. As Tony says, "not having heard the original track" isn't a valid excuse for copying something. We are influenced all the time, when we turn on the radio, go into a shop with music playing, or dance in club. Music isn't like TV - you can look away from a TV, but it's pretty hard to avoid hearing music when it's playing near you. |
| quote: |
it would be harder to sue someone over just chords. The binary finary chords have been used over and over again - it's like the 12 bar blues of trance! It's top line melody. If you copied the riff of binary finary nearly note for note, then you'd be in trouble. |
its only those specific parts of the 2 tracks that sound the sam-ish
the 2 songs progress differently, and emphasize that meoldy differently so i dont think they're overly alike
interesting observation tho
Pointless discussion, Robert already changed the melody of it.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DC- Pointless discussion, Robert already changed the melody of it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nell no it wasnt pointless. your comment was pointless tbh. people are interested in music, music law, and this particular case. Obviously it was a coincidence and it was interesting to see that 2/3 of above & beyond gave their 2 cents on the topic in general. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.