TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- If You had the fate of trance in your hand...
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sshyperion 'cause you know it's soooo nice to read about how we're all tards and that certain genres of trance are gone. |
. but if there's one kind of human being that really makes me want to commit murder. it's those folks.
i would make it so that everyone liked a lot of different styles and trance and went to see djs for the music they place rather than their name. also, make it generally more popular again, not voerly popular, just enough so nights werent closing left right and centre.
Less fags who bitch about what other people want to listen to. More people who are looking for a good time rather than some background music to get drunk to.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Elroy79 Less fags who bitch about what other people want to listen to. More people who are looking for a good time rather than some background music to get drunk to. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJFreaq I don't follow the house scene too closely, so I don't know how they're doing, but as trance is concerned it's been kinda lame. Anyway. |
. /end (semi) random
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Aquarian the chart-topping tunes are full of crap |
and stayed there for a couple of weeks or a week.. im not sure..
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Soonmeister Trance is a awesome and inspiring form of music that no other genre can replicate in any way LONG LIVE TRANCE Peace |
same here. And what the hell is up with these so-called "DJs" with the letter D at the end of their names?! DJ Danny D DJ Marky D. I'm sorry folks that doesn't make you any better. If anything it shows your inability to mix properly and be creative in your names, further ruining our lovely music
.
I would kill tiesto and rape his girlfriend (what? she's hot
Now
)
I'd move 50 cents to produce trance
Now for real...
I'd slap tiesto, armin, pvd, sasha, digweed and the rest and tell them to wake up cuz they are just ruining everything up.
I'd prefer them to start doing better and less comirialized stuff but if they just can't do it then quit.
They can still dj or produce, just don't call it trance.
It's not.
I'd pay DJ Sammy to rape paul oakenfold's ass if he won't stop releasing shit.
I'd ban drugs from the scene (If the drugies here will start flaming me it will be fun
), I think it only does bad to pepole and to the image of the scene itself.
Just my 2 cents,
Omer
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zombie0915 My dislike for trance bumper stickers and ringtones has alot to do with the way EDM is treated in America. Americans love EDM, but they just don't realize it. EDM is in the background of all our commercials, we hear it when we go to the mall and walk by the abercrombie, we hear it behind our tv shows, we hear it everywhere, except on the radio and at the parties. It really pisses me off that trance music and most other EDM is considered by most Americans as background music that is not to be paid attention to. Way too much talent is wasted making music that goes into the background of stuff that the typical person just ignores. When someone comes along who has one of those songs on the cd, kid will recognize it but not know where it came from, until somebody chimes in, "hey is that the song from the mitsubishi commercial with the stupid bitch in the pink hat squirming in the passenger seat?" So my previous rant about eliminating tance from the selection of background material available to marketers was mainly because I think trance music deserves much better, it deserves to be in the places where people go when they want to listen to music and not behind commercials acting as some silly trendy sound that nobody will ever really appreciate. The general masses who see your bumper sticker or hear your ringtone don't deserve to be hearing the music if they are going to just treat it as background material, you should save your need to express yourself for the people who are willing to actually listen to EDM for the joy of it instead of using it as background material, or else your just gonna be the nerdy kid who listens to songs from behind commercials. Anyway, I would make trance available only at places where people go for the purpose of listening to music, no more of this background music crap. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sshyperion that's all fine and dandy but still doesn't really answer the thread's primary question: what would you do if you had the Fate of Trance in your hands? 'cause you know it's soooo nice to read about how we're all tards and that certain genres of trance are gone. |
What would I do with trance?
Try to combine the energy, experimentalism, and variety of pre-1995 trance with the mixing and mastering of 2008 trance.
![]()
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles What would I do with trance? Try to combine the energy, experimentalism, and variety of pre-1995 trance with the mixing and mastering of 2008 trance. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PETRAN I can't see why people say that sound had NOTHING to do with classic trance this is defintielly over-stretched. |
make it darker and simpler 
i would send it on a 20 year journey to return to its homeland, constantly endangered by legion of unfriendly mythological creatures, desires of the flesh, self-doubt, and apathy.
Then I would devour its children and/or have sex with them on a mountain.
id instantly turn music production technology and computer technology back to how it was before 2000. and halt all advances in technology. back in those pre 2000 days i couldnt afford all the hardware and a decent pc to sequence on, so id not ba able to make music like i can now. but i know the music available would overall be better in the long run. and i think now im older with more money i would be able to fork out the �5-10k needed for a good studio back then.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by richg101 im older with more money i would be able to fork out the �5-10k needed for a good studio back then. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles They're certainly related. It was much more of a continuous evolution than a sharp break. Personally, I don't mind a lot of the stuff that came out until around 1999, which is when the "who can make the biggest, baddest breakdown" contest became the whole goal of the more popular kind of trance, and its roots in techno were left behind for good. I love the kind of stuff that Sasha was playing from 1997 - 99, for example. Great melodic prog trance. |
I'd have it evolve into 3 different sub-branches:
a) usually 125-130 BPM. Very interchangeable with tech-house and techno, borrowing both elements from it and from early 90s classic trance. Basically tech-house with an hypnotic feeling and more synthesizer/arpeggio layers than usual. Pretty much a continuation of the "neotrance" idea that seems to be dying. The perfect stuff if you're a crossover house/techno dj and want to incorporate some trance elements.
b) usually 132-138 BPM. Remember Sasha and Digweed's "Northern Exposure" series? Remember James Holden's early singles like I Have Put Out The Light and Way Out West's remix of Horizons? Remember later obscure Bonzai tracks like Float - Preparation? THAT sound. Slightly evolved into something intentionally more listening-oriented than club-oriented. We could label it "deep trance", even if this would technically be more "progressive trance" than anything else, just to separate it from the dying nonsense that progressive developed into. And to emphasize that this is meant to be a DEEP sound.
c) usually 138-145 BPM. Forget the last 5 or 6 years of trance. Remember how epic trance used to be played very fast-paced? Remember Paul Van Dyk pitching up tracks in insane amounts, like over +8%? Remember Tiesto's 1999->2000 new years eve Trance Energy set? I don't really like epic trance all that much any more, but it worked so much better at that speed. With that slightly hard edge. Funny thing is that those old 1993 Cosmic Baby tracks worked really well due to the same thing -> the speed those melodies kept going through the speakers. Let's fuse those two sounds together with one condition -> keep the amount of breakdowns and supersaws to a minimum.
With all sorts of crossover tracks between these 3 branches of course, but with most music being clustered into these 3 main ideas.
With an emphasis back on giving the audience a "human", full, dirty sound, rather than spending ages polishing those frequencies until every synth sounds absolutely 100% crystal clear. I hate that shit, whenever I hear it it always seems to have detracted from the creativity of the artist in actually writing the track. (I'm not sure if I've managed to describe correctly what I want here.
)
With that soft, slow sound, heavily influenced by pop, rock and progressive house, dead and buried. Armin, Markus, Gabriel & Dresden: fuck off.
I wish so much that I had the patience and the skills to turn these ideas into music...
As someone else said, make it simpler. Too much bloated shite from labels like anjunabeats with probably 100 or so tracks, it sounds shitty.
By the way, in this my idea of trance that I've just described, the psy scene would also remain unchanged and hopefully locked in a far, safe place, completely separate from it. Just to keep the hippies busy and make sure both themselves and their horrible noises don't crossover into the other trance scene. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by noikeee I'd have it evolve into 3 different sub-branches: a) usually 125-130 BPM. Very interchangeable with tech-house and techno, borrowing both elements from it and from early 90s classic trance. Basically tech-house with an hypnotic feeling and more synthesizer/arpeggio layers than usual. Pretty much a continuation of the "neotrance" idea that seems to be dying. The perfect stuff if you're a crossover house/techno dj and want to incorporate some trance elements. |
I remember you raving about that album a couple months ago in some random thread, but I never could be arsed to go search for it. 
Don't know why but I wasn't very impressed by Boratto's album, though.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sleepydragon I dont know how u can compare the two |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.