TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- gay adoption [debate]
Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 »


Posted by Chris Crossland on Jan-27-2007 16:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Marc Summers
Why would someone that hates homosexuals even bother to come on this site? This genre is probably the most accepting to homosexuals.


Dog, I don't hate them. I have never said that. I don't think to highly of them cause i think it is wrong.


Posted by Marc Summers on Jan-27-2007 16:58:

quote:
Originally posted by gwrmarines
Dog, I don't hate them. I have never said that. I don't think to highly of them cause i think it is wrong.


Dude... No. You called them "Queers".


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-27-2007 17:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Marc Summers
Dude... No. You called them "Queers".


I use that word all the time, doesn't really mean I hate anyone. It's just a word. I think some of you people who are criticizing other people's hatred are succumbing to it yourselves...

I mean, doesn't it just infuriate you when somebody says or does something you simply do not understand? I mean, clearly, their viewpoint is out of nothing but ignorance, especially compared to your opinion on the matter, which is obviously the best opinion in the world ever.

The only way I have been able to come to terms with other people is to take a step back and imagine myself in their shoes. It's how I try to understand others who are not like myself, it's how I come to accept people with views that are drastically different than my own. Once I understand this, I can hope to change what I see to be the product of ignorance. I think both sides of this argument could use a little more perspective at times.


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-27-2007 17:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I use that word all the time, doesn't really mean I hate anyone. It's just a word. I think some of you people who are criticizing other people's hatred are succumbing to it yourselves...

I mean, doesn't it just infuriate you when somebody says or does something you simply do not understand? I mean, clearly, their viewpoint is out of nothing but ignorance, especially compared to your opinion on the matter, which is obviously the best opinion in the world ever.

The only way I have been able to come to terms with other people is to take a step back and imagine myself in their shoes. It's how I try to understand others who are not like myself, it's how I come to accept people with views that are drastically different than my own. Once I understand this, I can hope to change what I see to be the product of ignorance. I think both sides of this argument could use a little more perspective at times.


but until that happens... get in the kitchen and fix me some dinner!


Posted by Fast Turtle on Jan-27-2007 17:58:

Jesus says: "Judge not, lest ye be judged yourself."

So you Christians who want to argue about morals and whatnot can go pick up a book.


Posted by UWM on Jan-27-2007 18:08:

I'm having a hard time determing whether clubamerica or gwrmarines is a more pathetic excuse for a human being. Can we call it a tie?


Posted by UWM on Jan-27-2007 18:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_Blue
which is assuming that foster parents are shitty.


Right, and nowhere did I indicate that every foster situation was a bad one. I'm sure (and I know people who have been through them) that there are many positives as well.

I was trying to make the point that putting a child with a homosexual couple, which could open them to ridicule from schoolmates, would be less mentally damaging than having them raised in a non-loving environment.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-27-2007 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
but until that happens... get in the kitchen and fix me some dinner!


Yes, thir.


Posted by RapidFire on Jan-27-2007 19:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
how can something that exists in nature be unnatural.


because its a genetic disorder.


Posted by Fast Turtle on Jan-27-2007 20:00:

Genetic disorders are natural. Damage occurs to DNA all the time in nature.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-27-2007 20:08:

If there was no such thing as disorder, nothing would ever change.


Posted by Orbax on Jan-27-2007 20:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
If there was no such thing as disorder, nothing would ever change.


Nothing ever changes, if it always stays the same. Quite literally.


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-27-2007 20:10:

there's a reason i used a period rather than a question mark.


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-27-2007 20:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Orbax
Nothing ever changes, if it always stays the same. Quite literally.


1+1=2!


Posted by RapidFire on Jan-27-2007 20:12:

right but define "disorder";

'lack of order or regular arrangement'

you cant possibly argue that its normal. much less try to argue that its more normal than heterosexuality.


Posted by Omega_Blue on Jan-27-2007 20:17:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Right, and nowhere did I indicate that every foster situation was a bad one. I'm sure (and I know people who have been through them) that there are many positives as well.

I was trying to make the point that putting a child with a homosexual couple, which could open them to ridicule from schoolmates, would be less mentally damaging than having them raised in a non-loving environment.


aight, i see where you're coming from.


Posted by clubamerica on Jan-27-2007 20:21:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
I'm having a hard time determing whether clubamerica or gwrmarines is a more pathetic excuse for a human being. Can we call it a tie?
Why are people getting bent out of shape.this is my opinion i simply dont accept homosexuals period end of story.but u guys defend them till the end of earth.


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-27-2007 20:34:

quote:
Originally posted by RapidFire
right but define "disorder";

'lack of order or regular arrangement'

you cant possibly argue that its normal. much less try to argue that its more normal than heterosexuality.


just as you can't possibly argue that heterosexuality was normal, much less try to argue that it was more normal than agamogenesis.


Posted by RapidFire on Jan-27-2007 21:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
just as you can't possibly argue that heterosexuality was normal


of course you can. the signs are all over the human body...


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-27-2007 21:04:

quote:
Originally posted by RapidFire
of course you can. the signs are all over the human body...


dude, the human body is a freak of nature.


Posted by RapidFire on Jan-27-2007 21:09:

alright well im talking human nature here


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-27-2007 21:37:

i'm watching the movie The Last Supper, and lol it couldn't be playing at a more appropriate time


Posted by Ed G on Jan-29-2007 14:29:

This one goes out to gwrmarines and clubamerica.


Posted by jdat on Jan-29-2007 14:55:

you know I really don't care if people are straight gay or whatever but you all have to be honest with yourselves.

Being strictly homosexual can't be 100% natural. Humanity as a whole could not make it past a generation if everyone became homosexual.
I kind of get annoyed with the whole nature example of dolphins or penguins as a defense to the gay = natural program.

Bisexuality on the other hand is more natural I would say...

Ok feel free to flame me ...


Posted by Ed G on Jan-29-2007 15:30:

Homosexuality is Nature's method of population control.

Don't hate Nature.


Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.