TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- beautiful cars...*EDITED*BUILT BEFORE 1995 BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pages (13): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 »

DIdnt bother to see if this was posted, but this has to be ranked in the top 3

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel he meant a Mitsubishi FTO (which in the USA = Mitsu 3000GT) and it is fast. the VR-4 is heavier because of the awd system but the vr4 is TT. its got LOTS of power potential just by using a boost controller.

no the FTO is a smaller two door fwd car. the GTO is big and heavy and is the 3000gt in the US|

FTO:

quote:

Originally posted by biznology no the FTO is a smaller two door fwd car. the GTO is big and heavy and is the 3000gt in the US| FTO:

yeah your right...i totally mixed them up. although the FTO in AWD would be awesome!

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel he meant a Mitsubishi FTO (which in the USA = Mitsu 3000GT) and it is fast. the VR-4 is heavier because of the awd system but the vr4 is TT. its got LOTS of power potential just by using a boost controller.

Well either way, lots of power but they can't handle to save their life

And Johnny, I don't believe you

the car that ran on water. i'd like to see this technology make a come back.


A 1912 Stanley Steamer

too bad its still a ford|

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M the car that ran on water. i'd like to see this technology make a come back. A 1912 Stanley Steamer [img]...

what do you think was heating that water? magic? nuclear power?

it was burning wood or oil fuel, and much less efficient or cleanly|

quote:

Originally posted by biznology what do you think was heating that water? magic? nuclear power? it was burning wood or oil fuel, and much less efficient or cleanly|

it was kerosene actually, which provided more heat per unit than gas. utilizing steam power is a very efficient way of conserving energy. With today's technology it will be interesting to see how these cars perform.

quote:

Originally posted by bas Well either way, lots of power but they can't handle to save their life And Johnny, I don't believe you

Not exactly, the 3000GT VR-4 had better acceleration, breaking and skid pad/slalom results the the Z32 300ZX TT.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M it was kerosene actually, which provided more heat per unit than gas. utilizing steam power is a very efficient way of conserving energy. With today's technology it will be interesting to see how these cars perform.

and how often would people need to refill their heavy water tanks if the cars were to go above 20 mph?

quote:

Originally posted by biznology and how often would people need to refill their heavy water tanks if the cars were to go above 20 mph?

the water tank wouldn't ever have to be refilled.

quote:

Originally posted by bas Well either way, lots of power but they can't handle to save their life

A lot of people say that about the GTO and GTR's, fact is there's a number of different driving techniques to use when you're in an all wheel drive, all wheel steering car that people tend to forget about. Much different to either a RWD or FWD car in terms of maintaining traction and cornering, then throw in AWS and you've got something which literally feels like it's losing traction going through corners as the back wheels steer on top of the sometimes unique handling characteristics of AWD.

Course people say 'it handles bad', most of them come from backgrounds of automatic gearbox, 100hp FWD imported econoboxes and old RWD, weight over the front wheels, soggy suspension, domestic beaters they've been driving all their life and now something 'doesn't feel right' when they turn a corner.

All the AWD cars are heavy, there's a lot more engineering running around underneath them to drive all 4 wheels.


Celica GT4

I think these little beasts as a mass-produced car where one of the best looking around. Wasn't so taken with the model that came after which didn't have the pop up headlights, they're a good car too but just didn't quite work for me.
Looking back on it, was the most 'fun' car I ever owned, (the rims are kind of yucky on that one in the picture), I'd own one again but they're getting long in the tooth and been owned by at least a dozen people even more suicidal than me, before I'd get my hands on one again... so it's kind of a liability.

quote:

Originally posted by Lilith A lot of people say that about the GTO and GTR's, fact is there's a number of different driving techniques to use when you're in an all wheel drive, all wheel steering car that people tend to forget about. Much different to either a RWD or FWD car in terms of maintaining traction and cornering, then throw in AWS and you've got something which literally feels like it's losing traction going through corners as the back wheels steer on top of the sometimes unique handling characteristics of AWD. Course people say 'it handles bad', most of them come from backgrounds of automatic gearbox, 100hp FWD imported econoboxes and old RWD, weight over the front wheels, soggy suspension, domestic beaters they've been driving all their life and now something 'doesn't feel right' when they turn a corner. All the AWD cars are heavy, there's a lot more engineering running around underneath them to drive all 4 wheels. Celica GT4 I think these little beasts as a mass-produced car where one of the best looking around. Wasn't so taken with the model that came after which didn't have the pop up headlights, they're a good car too but just didn't quite work for me. Looking back on it, was the most 'fun' car I ever owned, (the rims are kind of yucky on that one in the picture), I'd own one again but they're getting long in the tooth and been owned by at least a dozen people even more suicidal than me, before I'd get my hands on one again... so it's kind of a liability.

my dad had a friend that invited him to a 'open' BMW gymkhana on a frozen lake west of where i live. he said it was great autocrossing on ice, and the celica stomped all of the bmw's, but the main issue was the turbo. you had to NOT use it as mid turn all four wheels would start roostertailing fountains of ice.

thats sweet.

in terms of 'steam power' why doesnt someone post a link of how this is actually being developed into a future product?

theoretically youd never have to refill the tank. but we are talking about CARS. you would have to at some point. and almost all cars need to go 70-90 mph to be viable.

so why steam?|

quote:

Originally posted by biznology my dad had a friend that invited him to a 'open' BMW gymkhana on a frozen lake west of where i live. he said it was great autocrossing on ice, and the celica stomped all of the bmw's, but the main issue was the turbo. you had to NOT use it as mid turn all four wheels would start roostertailing fountains of ice. thats sweet. in terms of 'steam power' why doesnt someone post a link of how this is actually being developed into a future product? theoretically youd never have to refill the tank. but we are talking about CARS. you would have to at some point. and almost all cars need to go 70-90 mph to be viable. so why steam?|

No you would never have to fill the tank of WATER, the power source to heat the steam (ie gas, wood, whatever), is what you would have to replenish. The power comes from the whole cycle of steam heating and then cooling. Either way there is no 100% efficient steam engine, even in the ideal world. The most efficent engine is the Carnot engine (still talking about steam). Even then that is not anywhere close to 100% efficiency.

Using a fuel which is not 100% efficient then going to a steam engine which won't be 100% efficient is not good at all.

Summary
Steam power will never be good because you have to heat it somehow. It's like adding a middleman, why use gas to heat steam rather than using the gas itself?



Basic Thermodynamics

quote:

Originally posted by everett No you would never have to fill the tank of WATER, the power source to heat the steam (ie gas, wood, whatever), is what you would have to replenish. The power comes from the whole cycle of steam heating and then cooling. Either way there is no 100% efficient steam engine, even in the ideal world. The most efficent engine is the Carnot engine (still talking about steam). Even then that is not anywhere close to 100% efficiency. Using a fuel which is not 100% efficient then going to a steam engine which won't be 100% efficient is not good at all. Summary Steam power will never be good because you have to heat it somehow. It's like adding a middleman, why use gas to heat steam rather than using the gas itself? Basic Thermodynamics

okay, i understand.

that is mostly what i meant when i first asked for the 'why of steam' question before the water tank. my point was that, YES current tech could make a *better* steam engine, but how would that be as powerful while being more efficient when no one has pursued the tech in nearly 100 years in autos.

mostly it was cause Omega_M said the car ran on water, which isnt entirely true.

also, if there was a production steam engine, i think eventually you might have to replace the water, even if not often (due to buildup, corrosion, etc)|

quote:

Originally posted by enferno

nice

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel Jamie: you wouldnt buy this saleen?

hell yea i would. but not that exact one.

white only. chrome rims, but not those.

quote:

Originally posted by biznology too bad its still a ford|

some 16V can do some serious damage though

quote:

Originally posted by Slylee hell yea i would. but not that exact one. white only. chrome rims, but not those.

haha well the rims on that one are ugly. and i hate yellow. mine would be a nice deep high metallic blue, high metallic silver, or white. black requires too much attention.

The only car I�d drive in yellow is this one.







this is the finest ass i've ever seen on a car.




ok can we change the thread title to just cars in general. screw this 1995 bullshit

quote:

Originally posted by Slylee The only car I�d drive in yellow is this one. this is the finest ass i've ever seen on a car.

i like this GT2 better. fastest porsche of all time excluding the Carrera GT.
[IMG]http://www.butzi.cz/modely/98_911_gt2_evolution_(993)/98_911_gt2_evolution_(993)_01.jpg[/IMG]

quote:

Originally posted by Slylee The only car I�d drive in yellow is this one. ....

Not this one?



Haha, just kiddin', this is a blasphemy IMO. I don't think bright yellow really fits on a 60s ponycar, even if it is a 21st century upgrade.

lol yea...um. no


gzemethalfkjdlafjie

fix ur image link thing

1995 Lexus SC400

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.