TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Amazing new discovery in the early house/ acid house music history
Pages (8): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Again, your idea seems incredibly muddy and unclear. I don't see what you really think acid means. Is it yellow smiley faces and tie dye? Is it the mechanisation of disco? Is it cold, impersonal and forboding? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec acid is a vibe and spirit, a technological spirit, submission to and celebration of technology and a hyperreal version or simulacrum of disco and all (black) dance music to come before it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by enydo and of the father, the son, and the holy ghost. amen. |
I'd ask how this definition of acid is discernibly different from techno, but I'm sure you've got another ineffable vibe for that as well. "Acid is a spirit" is about as esoteric as it gets.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J I'd ask how this definition of acid is discernibly different from techno, but I'm sure you've got another ineffable vibe for that as well. "Acid is a spirit" is about as esoteric as it gets. |
Bullshit have-cake-and-eat escape clause.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Bullshit have-cake-and-eat escape clause. |
You've just created a definition of acid that allows you to lump just about any record you so please (rhythm and technology-based electronic dance music, you say!?) and then escape under the "It's all subjective/esoteric/vibes" clause when anyone disagrees.
To reiterate the point I've already made a couple of times: not only is my definition correct, it's much more lucid, precise and helpful than your nebulous word-gush.
Man, i've missed these genre-defining wars with System-J
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Totally disagree with all this. The 303 is acid. Acid is a sound, not a genre, and acid house is just house that predominantly features a 303. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec No, just second hand accounts I've read about, and some first hand accounts. And anyway, if they weren't 303 it would only reinforce my point that the 303 is not acid. Not only that but I think acid house was inevitable regardless of the legendary 'accidental' discovery by phuture. (every movement needs legends though) it was a sound that had existed for some time in experimental music and there was a general push towards mechanization of disco that was a result of technology as a whole changing rapidly, as well bodies' relationship to technology and music. If that instrument hadn't been invented, I feel that we'd simply be connecting another instrument to the term 'acid', whose coining had to do with the effect and environment that the music (and the set as a whole) had on the crowd. as legend goes, people didn't know what to think about 'acid trax' when it was first played. It was Ron Hardy's dogged, mind-bending, visionary deejaying that made people want to climb the walls like they were on acid (and probably were in many cases) |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ishkur So in other words, you really haven't the foggiest clue and you're just bullshitting with no discernible point. Okay. |
Not much clearer. Stop trying.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by EddieZilker This! The TB303 is 100% responsible for that "Acid" designation. For starters, it went well with LSD (aka acid). When I've worked with DJ's who asked for an acidic sound, the TB303 emulation was always what satisfied their requirement. And Dear God, I've heard enough of shitty music made with the 303 to last a life-time; music incidentally referred to as "Acid" at the time when "Acid" music was in its heyday on the dance floor. Every Acid House record I ever picked up had a TB303 (sounding) riff in it. "Acid" and that notoriously misused little synth are absolutely synonymous. While other people have appropriated its sound for use in non-acid works, it is notoriously acidic. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On Not much clearer. Stop trying. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec I don't think anyone is in disagreement that you can say the word 'acid' and be referring to a sound that you can make with the TB-303. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec where are you getting this? acid is the 'new dance craze'. it's not an instrument or a sound. acid is a culture/movement. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec believe me, all the insufferable purist wankery is on your end, trying to define define define according to a pure notion that has no basis in reality, that is, that the sound of a tb-303 with filter and resonance is called 'acid', without any supporting evidence to your claim, in the face of several primary source accounts that disprove your argument. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lews Eh? Does not compute. |
I've been reading the whole thing, dear 
I posted these things after the quotes you pulled:
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Yours tranny I'm willing to say that it's acceptable to call the sound of the tweaking tb303 'acid' (though I personally would never say this), if you admit that there are acid house tracks that don't use TB303, and that acid house is a movement. No reason it can't be both, it's just a word. but I still think it's more correct to say the technique is acid, whether it's a 303 or drum machine, or a sampler, or whatever. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Yours tranny that's why i suggested we just accept both as truth. no reason the word 'acid' can't be used to refer to: 1.) the sound of a 303 tweaking 2.) any synthesizer/drum machine/sampler manipulated in a similar way 3.) a constellation of house records mostly originating from a dance culture in chicago which signaled a distinct break from disco oriented tracks to alien-sounding, aggressive, percussive, rhythmic tracks that relied on repetitive, variously articulated mechanical manipulation and modulation of early synthesizers, drum machines, and samplers, central to which was (1). |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by EddieZilker This! The TB303 is 100% responsible for that "Acid" designation. For starters, it went well with LSD (aka acid). When I've worked with DJ's who asked for an acidic sound, the TB303 emulation was always what satisfied their requirement. And Dear God, I've heard enough of shitty music made with the 303 to last a life-time; music incidentally referred to as "Acid" at the time when "Acid" music was in its heyday on the dance floor. Every Acid House record I ever picked up had a TB303 (sounding) riff in it. "Acid" and that notoriously misused little synth are absolutely synonymous. While other people have appropriated its sound for use in non-acid works, it is notoriously acidic. Jesus! Plastik Man's (Ritchie Hawtin) Sheet One, practically a showcase for everything the TB303 was capable of that it hadn't yet been used for, is a double-entendre, implicitly linking the association between the two. It wasn't because Hawtin was designating that the 303 be associated with Acid Music. It's simply because the 303 is acid. |
Well, for me that specific sound defines "acid" in the same way that the super-saw defines epic trance, orchestras define classical and heavy distorted quitars define metal music. simple as that. Well, yeah there are "grey areas" because it is musical genres we are talking about and not chairs or tables (even these concrete objects can be difficult to define sometimes, i know of a few "chair" examples...) but these instruments and sounds provide the points of gravity that the majority of the genre's examples revolve, going far to the genre's boundaries ("inter-section points" with other "genre-fields").
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PETRAN Well, for me that specific sound defines "acid" in the same way that the super-saw defines epic trance, orchestras define classical and heavy distorted quitars define metal music. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec I posted these things after the quotes you pulled: |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lews Yes, but you obviously don't think that the sound is what is acid, you're just trying to pull a, "let's just both agree that we're both right," so that you don't lose. |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by nefardec Whoa.. paranoid much? So the purpose of discussions is to just lambast one another and never agree on anything? |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.