TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- The Ashes Begin
Pages (20): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »


Posted by Ian on Aug-11-2005 23:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Ghostface
Not off to a good start Australia. Dropping catches everywhere, i think 4 in total, plus a wicket on a no-ball.


on the other hand, a great day to be a pom. Vaughan showed why he's one of the best on his day, his footwork was better today and he was still at the point of impact, a good sign for us. Pietersen got carried away with that knock I think, but Bell toughed it out, and i'm well proud of him as i've been calling for him to get a run in the team for a couple of years now. With freddie to come on his home ground, and Jones owing us some runs, now would be a good time to hope for a 500+ score, with the leading wicket taker this season at OT of Harmison


Posted by eROs.au on Aug-11-2005 23:32:

Thumbs up

Congrats to shane warne for his 600th wicket

dw australia will come back and take the ashes back home


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-12-2005 14:13:

73-1, 271 behind.
No biggie, shaping up to be another good game.


Posted by Philby on Aug-12-2005 14:15:

371 behind......


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-12-2005 14:16:

oops. So it is.

I reckon thaty pommie fool on SBS said it wrong too.....

Maybe its a biggie then


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2005 15:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
oops. So it is.

I reckon thaty pommie fool on SBS said it wrong too.....

Maybe its a biggie then


plus the 5 wickets down already i'm liking this

*runs back to tv*


Posted by Ash Parajuli on Aug-12-2005 16:15:

With Clarke injured.. I think the current partnership needs to be damm good otherwise Australia lose this test aswell.

Australia need 2 centuries atleast now to get into a decent position to bowl in the 2nd innings and hopefully restrict England in setting a high target. ~250 - ~350 would be ideal for Australia to chase on a good batting surface (but then again, looking at Australia's current batting form, a target of ~200 by England would be a big ask for Aust)


Posted by Ian on Aug-12-2005 17:27:

I think the balance of the team is wrong. I'd drop Katich for Brad Hodge, and perhaps Tait or Kasprowicz for Dizzy. too much is being relied on just 3 bowlers, whereas england have 5


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-13-2005 08:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
I'd drop Katich for Brad Hodge............. too much is being relied on just 3 bowlers, whereas england have 5


What, so you drop a guy who bowls not too bad spin for a guy that can't (to the best of my knowledge) bowl?


Posted by Ian on Aug-13-2005 10:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
What, so you drop a guy who bowls not too bad spin for a guy that can't (to the best of my knowledge) bowl?


Hodge bowls in county cricket here. However If you want a second spinner, pick Macgill, and give Hodge (who I can assure you is a scurge of many english bowler here) to score the runs that katich isn't.


As for today, well, it's manchester, you can't go more than 3 days without rain


Posted by Ghostface on Aug-13-2005 11:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^

As for today, well, it's manchester, you can't go more than 3 days without rain

hopefully it keeps going for another two and a half days.


Posted by Ian on Aug-13-2005 11:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Ghostface
hopefully it keeps going for another two and a half days.


anything is possible in manchester. it might not stop raining until december. then again it might be blue skies and red hot in 20 minutes. you really can't tell


Posted by Ghostface on Aug-14-2005 00:37:

Sounds exactly like where I live.

Warne is going great guns on 78 off 104. Gillespie doing ok as well, guess you could call 7 runs of 54 balls solid.

Geez our top order needs to pull their finger out.


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-14-2005 10:03:

Warney you fool!!!!!


Oh well, he's now the highest ever runscorer without a century. Or so I am led to believe.


Posted by Philby on Aug-14-2005 10:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
Warney you fool!!!!!


Oh well, he's now the highest ever runscorer without a century. Or so I am led to believe.




just turned it on, what happened? hope it wasn't a stupid shot or something...


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-14-2005 10:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby


just turned it on, what happened? hope it wasn't a stupid shot or something...


yep, silly shot on 90. Hooked it straight down the throat of deep square leg.
Slater had just finished saying "I hope he doesn't do anythign silly"


Posted by Philby on Aug-14-2005 10:18:

****0x!!

poor warney! come on mate you'll get a hundred one day hehe


Posted by Philby on Aug-14-2005 10:47:

well there we go, all out and 142 runs behind. lets hope we bowl better than we batted lately...


Posted by Ian on Aug-14-2005 10:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
****0x!!

poor warney! come on mate you'll get a hundred one day hehe


he's been in the 90s more than once and on both occasions holed out. I think he needs to take his time a little bit more, Dizzy was holding the other end up fine, and that shot may leave you 20 or 30 runs short of w hat you could've got, only time will tell how important it is


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-14-2005 11:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
he's been in the 90s more than once and on both occasions holed out.


Yeah, last time was 99, and from memory was another silly shot.


Posted by Ian on Aug-14-2005 11:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Trance Nutter
Yeah, last time was 99, and from memory was another silly shot.


it sounds like Vaughan in the 190s, 2 times he's been in there, and both times he's played at awful deliveries for his downfall.


Anyway, hopefully I can go see some action if I can nick the tv from my mam


Posted by Ghostface on Aug-14-2005 11:29:

A bit of a shame for Warney but if it wasn't him it would be definitely all over by now. Hopefully we can bowl you guys out really cheaply and stay in the contest.

and here's praying for more rain!


Posted by Philby on Aug-14-2005 13:43:

poms made a good start so far, mcgrath cleaned up trescothic with an absolute blinder 2 for 102, 240-odd in front. couple of hat tricks and we'll be alright


Posted by TCB on Aug-14-2005 19:38:

well what a innings by strauss and bell. certainly keep their test spots. setting australia a almost impossible target of 423 on the final day. like they said its more of trying to stay in for the whole day. will be interesting to see if england can bowl them out. wouldnt that be something! i hope they do! there was some positive signs in the pitch for the england bowlers going into day. if only day 3 wasnt rained on i think england would definately be 2-1 up. but now the england bowlers have to show us their strength or let australia salvage a tie.


Posted by Ian on Aug-14-2005 20:52:

quote:

Third npower Test Match
Old Trafford
England 444 (M P Vaughan 166, M E Trescothick 63, I R Bell 59, S K Warne 4-99, B Lee 4-100) & 280-6 dec (A J Strauss 106, I R Bell 65, G D McGrath 5-115) v Australia 302 (S K Warne 90,
S P Jones 6-53) & 24-0

Opener Andrew Strauss hit his sixth Test century in just his 17th match as England set Australia what would be a world-record target of 423 to win the third Test at Old Trafford.

The Middlesex left-hander took just 158 balls to record his 106 and his partnership with Ian Bell of 127 for the third wicket helped the hosts to an impressive 280 for six wickets declared in just 62 overs.

Strauss could have gone in just the sixth over when he edged one between Shane Warne and Ricky Ponting in the slips but he and Marcus Trescothick went on to give England an ideal start with 64 for the first wicket.

Trescothick was the first to go after a brisk 41 off 56 balls when he played on off Glenn McGrath.

The left-hander appeared to be looking for a quick single as he pushed forward at the paceman but the ball bounced down and hit the top of the off stump.

Michael Vaughan, who smashed 166 in the first innnings, then went for 14 as he got a top edge and was snapped up by Brad Hodge down at long leg.

That brought Bell to the crease and, despite a slow start, the Warwickshire batsman found his touch as the innings progressed and he even drove McGrath for a glorious six.

Strauss brought up his maiden half-century against the Australians from 89 deliveries, including five fours and a hooked six and he added another maximum off Lee to move into the 90s.

His century came with a boundary off McGrath before another pull brought about his dismissal as Damien Martyn took a fine low catch.

Kevin Pietersen went first ball when he was trapped leg before and Andrew Flintoff could only add four as the England batsmen went for everything.

Bell, who had ridden his luck, was the last man out for 65 off 103 balls, giving McGrath his 28th five-wicket haul, and Vaughan called them in after Geraint Jones had smashed a rapid 27.

Australia closed on 24 without loss, openers Matthew Hayden and Justin Langer surviving against the spin of Ashley Giles and captain Vaughan as the light began to fade.

Earlier in the day Simon Jones picked up three wickets as Australia were bowled out for 302, a deficit of 142 runs on the first innings.

Shane Warne (90) missed out on a maiden Test century when he was caught on the square-leg boundary attempting to pull Jones.

The Welshman generated some appreciable reverse swing as he ran through the Australian tail.

Brett Lee (1) edged to Trescothick at slip and then Jason Gillespie's (26 from 111 balls) stoic resistance was ended when he was trapped plumb in front.

Jones ended with 6-53, his best figures in Test cricket.


good summary of the day


Pages (20): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.