TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- The Skool thread (how smart is TA?)
Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Omega_M people who think science and math are not creative subjects, need to think twice before replying over the internet, sitting at your home, hooked to a modem, communicating with TA server, over fiber optic cables, laid undersea, crisscrossing the globe...staring at an LCD screen, attached to your computer, with a microprocessor, made of semiconductor technology, in a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility, created from breakthroughs in science and maths, by brilliant scientists, who were creative enough to harness nature's laws, to develop innovative technology...it all began, when an apple fell on newton's head, and he thought about gravity, which lead to development of astronomy and calculus and optics, which lead to speculations about the nature of light and then of propagating electromagnetic waves, and then came Faraday with his electricity and then came Edison with his bulb...same time, people were understanding fluid mechanics and radiation and absolute frames of reference and the ether which led to the study of special relativity, then general relativity and also quantum mechanics and then came the wars and creativity was harnessed in making guns and planes and radars and sonars and mortars and nuclear weapons and everything exploded with the information age and here we are today debating merits of science and maths over the internets... cue people who think social sciences are dumb... |
I dunno why you guys are even arguing it. You'd think the goal of any person pursuing education is to be well rounded. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jennypie I don't see what's wrong with that. That's a big reason I like nursing. |
It's sort of the same in nursing. Continuing education/upgrading/knowledge of practice standards/current research is a mandatory part of being licensed to practice...since everything is evidence based.
edit: but yeah, I see what you're saying.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN its so we dont have to end up as a grunt in the military. |
@tbill's expense.
You guys know Bill is a pog, and doesn't deserve the honor of being called a grunt right?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Yeah? Then explain building 7, shill! |
graduated cornell university with a 5 year professional bachelor of architecture degree
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Omega_M people who think science and math are not creative subjects, need to think twice before replying over the internet, sitting at your home, hooked to a modem, communicating with TA server, over fiber optic cables, laid undersea, crisscrossing the globe...staring at an LCD screen, attached to your computer, with a microprocessor, made of semiconductor technology, in a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility, created from breakthroughs in science and maths, by brilliant scientists, who were creative enough to harness nature's laws, to develop innovative technology...it all began, when an apple fell on newton's head, and he thought about gravity, which lead to development of astronomy and calculus and optics, which lead to speculations about the nature of light and then of propagating electromagnetic waves, and then came Faraday with his electricity and then came Edison with his bulb...same time, people were understanding fluid mechanics and radiation and absolute frames of reference and the ether which led to the study of special relativity, then general relativity and also quantum mechanics and then came the wars and creativity was harnessed in making guns and planes and radars and sonars and mortars and nuclear weapons and everything exploded with the information age and here we are today debating merits of science and maths over the internets... cue people who think social sciences are dumb... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Domesticated No, Lebez and I argued that mathematics and science classes are uncreative, not the fields themselves. |
1 Bachelor's in Photography - 3.8 GPA
Have one year left to get my 2nd in Elementary Education - currently holding a 4.0 GPA 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild You guys know Bill is a pog, and doesn't deserve the honor of being called a grunt right? |

| quote: |
Originally posted by Omega_M @tbill's expense. sorry mate. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Domesticated No, Lebez and I argued that mathematics and science classes are uncreative, not the fields themselves. |
They do math, stupid.

What kind of math? Hard math? Number crunching? Does anyone with a math degree do something besides teaching like being an actuary or some other semi-worthless profession?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ziptnf What kind of math? Hard math? Number crunching? Does anyone with a math degree do something besides teaching like being an actuary or some other semi-worthless profession? |
I'm graduating in 2010 from the Master in Management of ESCP Europe, the oldest business school in the world, the 2nd best in Europe according to the FT.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Meat187 then buy a few sheep and a nice little house on Islay and spent the rest of my time sipping whiskey there. |
Why Islay? It just sounds pretty specific!
Bachelors in Finance from the University of Miami
2 years into a J.D. in Law...took some time off...applying now to finish up
Would like to get an MBA soon.
None beyond secondary. Enrolling in a local 2yr college to then transfer to a uni. Going into Mech Eng.
Is anyone actually going into a good career with all these degrees and good GPAs? I spent close to $100 grand on a degree and went into a field where a degree isnt even necessary (Air traffic control). I hope that piece of paper comes in handy one day.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Protege Is anyone actually going into a good career with all these degrees and good GPAs? I spent close to $100 grand on a degree and went into a field where a degree isnt even necessary (Air traffic control). I hope that piece of paper comes in handy one day. |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dervish Why Islay? It just sounds pretty specific! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tachobg Currently year 2, technically a math major, but I take all sorts of random stuff. Reading some of the comments, I just want to say -- you've never really done math or science properly if you think it is just using equations with little understanding of what they mean. Sure, the early years require rote learning and few can appreciate algebra/trig/etc as something more than a tool, if they appreciate it at all. Luckily for me, math classes generally stopped being like that around sophomore year of high school and I've loved it ever since. 3-4 four years later, I'm taking math/science classes where you don't get told what to do and there's no clear right answer. If you're doing theory for example, you have to *invent* whatever mathematical structures you need in order to prove some result. No one gives you a formula. In fact, very often *you* have to give the formula If you're applying theory, you also can't just plug in formulas (whether you or someone else derived the formula); you have to worry about implementation, algorithms, etc. Also, most tests are designed to make you think creatively -- to weed out those who just remember formulas without understanding and to reward those who are inventive and really understand the material. For that reason, it's not unusual for test averages to be 40-50/100 and even lower.That said, I've taken a few great philosophy courses and learned that it's also important to be able to reason about things that are not clearly defined. This does not mean to write bullshit, but to present clear arguments, even if the subject matter is fundamentally murky and poorly understood (e.g. consciousness, creativity, ethics, etc). My profs had little tolerance for bs or unclear thinking and were generally quick to point it out in papers. So I wouldn't say math/sci is necessarily easier or harder than humanities when both are done right. This means math/sci profs should challenge students to do more than just regurgitate memorized info, and humanities profs should have no tolerance for bullshit. More importantly, self-respecting students of the above should do the same. And ultimately I think both humanistic and scientific thinking can inform one's life on many different levels. I find myself thinking as often about how some bit of math explains something very 'non-scientific' in my life as I do about how something inherently philosophical does the same. |
Graduated Kindergarten
High School Diploma
Associates Degree in Science
*In-progress* Undergraduate Major Physics Minor Mathematics
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.