TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Should the guy pay for the date?
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]


Posted by Kytracid on May-17-2005 21:28:

^^^

BatiGOL looks very uncomfortable in that shot... LOL

Veron's red handbag...very chic. Hints of Manchester United there...

Zanetti with that polka dot pink thing looks...ummm...very GAY !

Not sure what the guy with the leapord print name is...but he does look pretty familiar. Is that the guy who got Beckham sent off in World cup 2002 ?


Great pic fayraree. That girl has been immortalized by some very clever photochopping.


Posted by Kytracid on May-17-2005 21:32:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Should the guy pay for the date?

quote:
Originally posted by fayraree
LOL!!! LIAR!!! I know you're watching Home and Garden right now...or maybe even the Food Network!!! LOL!!!


Hey the Food Network kicks ass ! Definately not ashamed to watch that from time to time...helps with the cooking skills, and that's never a bad thing.


Not so sure about Home and Garden though...might start watching that when i actually have a home with a garden that i give a damn about...currently the only thing green that does 'spark' my interest is 'weeds'.


and greenbacks of course...lord know i luvs me some of them greenbacks !


Posted by Kytracid on May-17-2005 21:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Bah... Beckham is a bigger pussy than the whole argentine team of 2002 combined.

Lets see Argentina kick some ass next year


As long as Tevez and Saviola feature upfront i'll be pretty happy.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on May-17-2005 22:28:

Re: Re: Re: Should the guy pay for the date?

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
if i have to be old fashioned why shouldnt she be then? Stay home and raise the kids and have supper waiting for me when i get home. Oh so now im chauvenist.... but what does that make the woman who expects me to still be traditional?

Glaring double standards here.


I don't disagree that there is a double standard here. In today's society the stay at home mom just can't work in every household. People who are 30 and below will typically not achieve the same financial success as their parents and therefore a double income in required.

I personally believe that in a household that can support only one income that the lady should stay at home and raise the children (this is not a chauvenistic statement but rather a reality statement as women are typically better capable of raising children...like it or not).

As for old fashioned gestures....why not....chivalry is not dead and I am sure many women still appreciate those little things we do for them.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-17-2005 22:36:

expecting men to pay for everything by default is chauvenism. i like the european way of split bills until you know each other. After that you can be just as nice as you wish to be since you know that person. Id never buy anyone else i just met a nice dinner so why should i pay for a stranger female?


Posted by Cal on May-17-2005 22:45:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
Absolutely disagree. If you care about her, you'd pamper her without thinking about it.


The problem with this is that in the back of the statement is the theory that women WANT to be pampered by their man, which is totally not true.

Don't get me wrong, nothing but good can come from opening doors, pulling out chairs, walking on the ouside of the curb and all that, but thats as far as pampering needs to get.

When you further "pamper" women by always getting the check, buying them shit, and changing your schedule for when its convenient for them, thats when they start to resent you.


Posted by zookeeper on May-18-2005 04:31:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Should the guy pay for the date?

quote:
Originally posted by Kytracid
if my wife told me she'd rather work then i'd gladly stay at home and raise my kids. It's not something i feel i'm naturally suited to do...but hey, we all make sacrifies in life, so if it came down to a choice between having my kids raised by strangers, or me putting on an apron and turning into Martha Stewert and baking cookies and arranging play dates you better believe i'll be ready to do it.



"I'm not afraid!!"
"Ehh...you will be...YOU WILL BE..."

A male, doing time with young children will put you in a rubber room with a sleeveless shirt in less than 2 years time, mark my words.
Women are far more patient in dealing with children.imo.


Posted by zookeeper on May-18-2005 05:28:

quote:
Originally posted by fayraree

Okay, you're scaring me man...you're making me think she's a PRAYING MANTIS and will totally think of me as inadequate...PLEASE EXPAND!!!



What I'm really saying is that when you and your wife decide to have children (really it's her decision imo) sex takes on a whole different angle. Making babies becomes a "crusade" for them, sex many times a week. If a month goes by and no "bun in the oven" they completely lose all rational thought and it turns into "overdrive sex" at all hours, every day of the week until "mission accomplished".

Once pregnant, sex loses all usefulness and is put away until the need for child #2, then the cycle repeats. Questions, class?


Posted by zoogla on May-18-2005 06:29:

quote:
Originally posted by zookeeper
sex many times a week. ... and it turns into "overdrive sex" at all hours, every day of the week until "mission accomplished".

LOL! Can't wait to get started! And a prenuptial agreement which stipulates consistent levels of sex before/after children should take care of that one! LOL!!

EDIT:
Oops, Sean...made a mistake...(where was my head?) LOL I wrote "sex" instead of "children" in my last sentence...


Posted by Sean Cassidy on May-18-2005 06:35:

quote:
Originally posted by fayraree
LOL! Can't wait to get started! And a prenuptial agreement which stipulates consistent levels of sex before/after sex should take care of that one! LOL!!


good one!!!!


Posted by Jayx1 on May-18-2005 15:05:

quote:
Originally posted by fayraree
LOL! Can't wait to get started! And a prenuptial agreement which stipulates consistent levels of sex before/after children should take care of that one! LOL!!

EDIT:
Oops, Sean...made a mistake...(where was my head?) LOL I wrote "sex" instead of "children" in my last sentence...



i didnt realize this before but prenups only count for any money made before you get married. Anything you make afterwards is open season prenup or not. Have kids and then you are really screwed. Decide not to get married and the government steps in and decides you are common law. So any way you look at it men get the raw deal in this one since men are usually the ones that lose everything.


Posted by zookeeper on May-21-2005 02:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
So any way you look at it men get the raw deal in this one since men are usually the ones that lose everything.


In New York State, almost as bad as California, if you have a dick, you're done.

Unless the wife has done documented abuse (seen by police) to the husband you're ass is grass and your ex-wife is the lawnmower.


Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.