TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- The illegal war is on :: denounce America’s imperialism !
Pages (24): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-22-2003 22:47:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee
neither am i arab or muslim....

and whoever suppports this war is outright supporting war as a solution to situations.....kapish?


no, not kapish

that is another false statement...how do you know what EVERYONE supports and doesn't support

do you know anything about the psychological states of nations, or global polling data? YOU KEEP SAYING THINGS WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE TO BACK THEM UP...it just makes you look like the idiot shouting "peace, peace" for no reason other than to fit in.


Posted by LKD on Mar-22-2003 22:49:

OMG..ur such a tool....time for me to quote myself...
quote:
Originally posted by LKD
please tell me u lived in the middle east and experienced the first gulf war cos i did and thats why im for peace


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-22-2003 22:52:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee
please tell me u lived in the middle east and experienced the first gulf war cos i did and thats why im for peace


you keep saying that, but tell me, what atrocious acts occurred in the fuking UAE??? because I know about a dozen people that were in Israel during that war, and they wern't really that shaken up at all...how many scuds were launched at Dubai? and how many were launched at Tel-Aviv? maybe you arn't mature enough to face the reality of war. you can plead for peace all you like, but peace will never be attained with "outlaw regimes" in power.


Posted by LKD on Mar-22-2003 22:56:

quote:
Originally posted by oceanlab
you keep saying that, but tell me, what atrocious acts occurred in the fuking UAE??? because I know about a dozen people that were in Israel during that war, and they wern't really that shaken up at all...how many scuds were launched at Dubai? and how many were launched at Tel-Aviv? maybe you arn't mature enough to face the reality of war. you can plead for peace all you like, but peace will never be attained with "outlaw regimes" in power.

do u really think that peace will be achieved after regime change???

have u even thought about what could be the backfire of this war??? how much terrorist activity will increase???

do u know why terrorists target USA for all their activity??? answer that


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-22-2003 22:58:

anyways, I am tired of debating with some one of your obviously infantile intelligence...my parents always told me that I will encounter many imbeciles in my lifetime and I have to learn to deal with that fact, so I try to, but sometimes someone like you comes a long and makes me angry because I remember how stupid some people really are.

I will answer more of your questions when I get back...but please, make them more entertaining than this.


Posted by Möbius on Mar-22-2003 22:59:

quote:
Originally posted by oceanlab
why do you think whatever sounds good is true?? There are plenty of things that are impossible...can you eat with your ass and shit out your mouth?????

note: peewee hockey coaches should never be quoted.

WOW the American media and propaganda has worked brilliantly on you, please continue to believe everything they feed you. Yes we need mass armies to protect us from Evil right?
Please rid Canada of your stupidity, assimilate and become an American.

Not only is it NOT impossible to resovle issues non-violently but it has BEEN DONE!
I need only mention one name, GHANDI
have you forgotten about him and others like him?
Instead of putting great men like Ghandi in government, we assasinated them.
There is an alternative answer/method to everything.....we just tend to choose the simple answer....in this case war.


Posted by Möbius on Mar-22-2003 23:02:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
it's funny how some of you guys are arguing over the way to go about this war and at the same time both pro-war and anti-war protesters have clashed in violence ..

everything seems to be a microcosm of something else ..


If you look closely it was the pro-war who initiated the verbal conflict with the anti-war protesters........surprising? I think not.


Posted by LKD on Mar-22-2003 23:08:

quote:
Originally posted by DJLocoMoco
If you look closely it was the pro-war who initiated the verbal conflict with the anti-war protesters........surprising? I think not.


it is evident in the following threads :

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=97050

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=97036


and of course....this thread itself....


Posted by sexy_manbeast on Mar-22-2003 23:16:

Evil1

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
hey the US has weapons of mass destruction too .. after this i'm sure Iraq will attack the US and launch "Operation American Freedom" to free them from the Bush oppressors..


The US do have weapons of mass destruction but they haven't taken over any country such as Iraq had done to Kuwait. When they lost the gulf one the many resulotions for surrender was that Iraq could no longer contain/build weapons of mass destruction. Which they have done serveral times. War is going to happen in this world and people do die, that's a shame. Also Saddam is an opressor, for example he places anti aircraft on top of apartment buildings,and will have his Repubilican guards shoot anyone trying to leave the building during an air raid. He needs to get out asap. And in whole the middle east needs democracy , Iraq being the first. By the way Bush isn't an opressor just oil hungry pig******.


Posted by Kytracid on Mar-22-2003 23:20:

quote:
Originally posted by oceanlab
no, not kapish

that is another false statement...how do you know what EVERYONE supports and doesn't support

do you know anything about the psychological states of nations, or global polling data? YOU KEEP SAYING THINGS WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE TO BACK THEM UP...it just makes you look like the idiot shouting "peace, peace" for no reason other than to fit in.


Ahem...I think i'm more inclined to believe and have respect for an idiot who is shouting "peace, peace" then a pretentious intellect who has fallen hook, line and sinker for everything the US media has reported on the justification of this war. You have said that a regime change is responisible for making sure that the weapons of mass destruction are not there. Are you aware that the US tried something similar in Iran a few decades back and it all went sour ? If memory serves me correct the US has a history of invading countries and setting up puppet regiemes which prove to be no better then the supposed 'authoritarian one's' they are removing...except for the fact that they have the US to thank for bringing them to power (something i'm sure the US Goverment will remind them when it comes time to releasing the oil wells that they have already seized).

Yes, Saddam is a dictator...he's been one for the last 20 years (or however many he has been in power). Just because he's a dictator doesn't mean his country should have to bear the brunt of an invasion. Don't you understand, the war will be over...Saddam will be hidding out in some cave like that other coward, and the only thing the Allies of the world power will have to show for it is the ghastly images of a war torn Baghdad where the streets will be stained with the blood of the innocent. If it was a simply case of a sygerical strike to remove Saddam i don't think the world would care...hell, send in a covert black ops team to assisinate him and see how many peace rallies are held...none, because people acknowledge he is an evil man...but this isn't about good and evil, and it's not about security or weapons of mass destruction...it's about oil, it's about an economy in recession and ultimately it's about US fears that someone out there is getting ready to obliterate them.

I'm sure you're going to retort by challenging my intelligence, and you may be right, i don't know as much about this war then you...and i might have studied in Canada and not the States...but i'm happy to be one of those idiots who screams "Peace, Peace" rather then, "Bombs and War !!! ".

Peace.


Posted by sexy_manbeast on Mar-22-2003 23:23:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee
do u really think that peace will be achieved after regime change???

have u even thought about what could be the backfire of this war??? how much terrorist activity will increase???

do u know why terrorists target USA for all their activity??? answer that


I think Al-Queda,Iraq and Afganhistan got the point not to try anymore terriost attacks on the states.I think if any country is associated with any more terriost attcks on the US, that country will be bombed tens more than Iraq. If I was president of the usa, I would taken all the money off of Bin Laden's family to pay for the victims family.


Posted by LKD on Mar-22-2003 23:29:

quote:
Originally posted by sexy_manbeast
I think Al-Queda,Iraq and Afganhistan got the point not to try anymore terriost attacks on the states.I think if any country is associated with any more terriost attcks on the US, that country will be bombed tens more than Iraq. If I was president of the usa, I would taken all the money off of Bin Laden's family to pay for the victims family.

the key word is 'if' and seeing how Bush got into power, it shouldnt be too hard if u try, afterall these days u cant try someone for ballot tampering if they have enough contacts....


Posted by Möbius on Mar-23-2003 00:11:

I would just like to add something that I found interesting in an interview conducted on CityTV with a Professor of Political science at York University.

He mentioned that one of the reasons Saddam came to power in Iraq was because the US actually supported his party (though I don't know if Saddam was a member of the party at the time) because the opposition wanted to nationalise oil (I don't remember the party names), and of course the US didn't want this so they supported Saddam's party.

Funny how the country that helped bring the man into power is now trying to get rid of him.

He also went on to mention that Saudi Arabia's regime is in SOME cases just as bad as Iraq's. Yet because they are "friends" with the US its ok right?

"Project Iraqi Freedom" my ass, the US is just using this regime change excuse to cover up the real reasons behind this war.

EDIT:
I suggest you all read this:
http://theinsurgent.net/index.php?v...rticle=usterror


Posted by dEsidEL on Mar-23-2003 00:16:

KarateKid

quote:
Originally posted by sexy_manbeast
The US do have weapons of mass destruction but they haven't taken over any country such as Iraq had done to Kuwait. When they lost the gulf one the many resulotions for surrender was that Iraq could no longer contain/build weapons of mass destruction. Which they have done serveral times. War is going to happen in this world and people do die, that's a shame. Also Saddam is an opressor, for example he places anti aircraft on top of apartment buildings,and will have his Repubilican guards shoot anyone trying to leave the building during an air raid. He needs to get out asap. And in whole the middle east needs democracy , Iraq being the first. By the way Bush isn't an opressor just oil hungry pig******.


was Iraq the only country to do this .. ? if not then what of the other countries ?


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-23-2003 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by DJLocoMoco
WOW the American media and propaganda has worked brilliantly on you, please continue to believe everything they feed you. Yes we need mass armies to protect us from Evil right?
Please rid Canada of your stupidity, assimilate and become an American.

Not only is it NOT impossible to resovle issues non-violently but it has BEEN DONE!
I need only mention one name, GHANDI
have you forgotten about him and others like him?
Instead of putting great men like Ghandi in government, we assasinated them.
There is an alternative answer/method to everything.....we just tend to choose the simple answer....in this case war.


yes you are completely right...at Georgetown they taught us to only look at one side of every conflict and to not read foreign newspapers. I can argue your dumbass side all day long as well...but this is what I believe in. I believe that people have a right not to live in fear. Saddam = fear.

also, you answered your own questions with the Ghandi remark. If you preach only peace then you have defensive capability. Any thug can come a long and force you from your country or kill you. Maybe if the Dalai Lama had the US military at his back, Tibet would still be a country. There are lots of injustices in the world, the weaker you are, the greater the chance that someone will take advantage. You can try to remain at peace, but to an extent. Once you cross that line, you are more weak than you are peaceful. The weak do not survive, unless someone wants to start disproving Darwin for me.


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-23-2003 00:33:

quote:
Originally posted by sexy_manbeast
If I was president of the usa, I would taken all the money off of Bin Laden's family to pay for the victims family.


they are trying to do that as we speak, and have been for over a year now, taking the terror funds that is


Posted by LKD on Mar-23-2003 00:35:

quote:
Originally posted by oceanlab
I believe that people have a right not to live in fear. Saddam = fear.



odd u say that cos they have been showing several Iraqis outside Iraq qho are agaisnt this war and think otherwise


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-23-2003 00:35:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
was Iraq the only country to do this .. ? if not then what of the other countries ?


so if five people robbed a bank, and you were in the process of capturing one of them, you would argue that you should let that bank-robber go because the others robbed the bank too?


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-23-2003 00:37:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee
odd u say that cos they have been showing several Iraqis outside Iraq qho are agaisnt this war and think otherwise


there are several people in lots of categories, it is easy to find several people, but thats not even the point. Iraqis have little to do with it, it is the countries that Saddam is threatening that have to fear him, not so much his own people.


Posted by Möbius on Mar-23-2003 00:39:

quote:
A Brief History of US-Sponsored Terrorism Abroad
by Mark Zapezauer



1946- U.S. opens School of the Americas in Panama. Now located in Fort Benning, Georgia, the "School of the Assassins" has taught over 60,000 personnel from some of the world's most brutal regimes how to subvert the truth, to muzzle union leaders, activist clergy, and journalists, and to make war on their own people.

1951- CIA is involved in a coup to overthrow nationalist Primeminister Dr. Muhammed Mossadeq in Iran. Supports Iranian military in massacre of Mossadeq supporters and returns the Shah to power. In 1976, Amnesty International concluded that the Shah's CIA-trained security force, SAVAK, had the worst human rights record on the planet, and that the number and variety of torture techniques the CIA had taught SAVAK were "beyond belief." 1951-CIA involved in terror campaign against democratically elected Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala. After Arbenz government is overthrown, CIA backed regimes murder more than 100,000 Guatemalans over the next 40 years

1961- CIA recruits 1500 Cuban exiles to invade Cuba and overthrow the Castro regime. The Pay of Pigs invasion would be a disaster, however the CIA would continue with more than two dozen attempts to kill Castro.

1963- The CIA have South Vietnemese president Ngo Dinh Diem overthrown and assasinated for supporting negotiations with the north. After 20 years of covert war the U.S. turns to direct military invasion, in a war that costs tens of thousands of Vietnemese, Cambodian and U.S. lives

1963- CIA recruits Iraqi Baath Party (including a young Saddam Hussein) to assasinate the new leader, Abdul-Karim Kassem. After the coup, the CIA gave the Baath a long list of communists and others to liquidate. During the 1980s the CIA would go on to help provide weapons to both Iraq and Iran in a war that would kill over one million people.

1965- CIA provokes a coup that leads to the overthrow of Indonesian leader Sukarno, who is replaced by General Suharto. In the follow ing weeks between 500,000 and one million people are murdered by death squads using lists provided by US State Department.

1973- After interfering in Chilean elections in 1958 and 1964, the CIA begins a campaign of sabotage and terror after leftist Salvadore Allende is elected president in 1970. In 1973, a CIA supported coup overthrew and assassinated Allende and installed fascist General Pinochet, resulting in thousands of murders over the next two decades. This year in France, former U.S. secretary of state, Henry Kissinger was served a (mostly symbolic) warrant for arrest as a war criminal for his role in the coup.

1979- After Nicaraguan dictator Samosa is overthrown in 1979, the CIA helps to train Samosa's National Guard into death squads known as the Contras. The Contras are used to terrorize rural Nicaragua while the US military blockades Nicaragua's harbors with mines. In 1989, after 10,000 deaths, the US is successful in ousting the Sandanista government.

1989- US invades Panama to overthrow and "arrest" Manuel Noriega, who has been on the CIA payroll since 1966 and supported through decades of drug running, political assassination and corrupt elections. After the invasion, which included the fire bombing of an entire urban ghetto, human rights observers uncover mass graves and estimate that over 4,000 died during the invasion.

1991- US and allies (mostly Britain) invade Iraq after U.S./CIA supported Saddam Hussein invades Kuwait. 200,000 Iraqis are killed, including over 400 civilians killed by two U.S. missiles in the Al-Amerya air shelter. Over the next 10 years another 400 tons of explosives will be dropped on Iraq killing another 300 civilians, and hundreds of thousands more starved through U.S. imposed sanctions. The U.S. forces Saudi Arabia to allow thousands of U.S. military to remain indefinitely within its boarders.

1998- Al Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan is bombed without warning by 13 U.S. cruise missiles killing a janitor. The attack deprives Sudan of desperately needed medical drugs and potentially killing tens of thousands of people. The CIA later admits that information linking the plant to Osama bin Laden was probably "incorrect."

Due to limitations of space I have not included the U.S. support of Israeli acts of terror against Palestinians, the atomic bombing of 200,000 civilians in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, the numerous other U.S. invasions south of the Rio Grande, the invasion of Grenada ,the 19th century war of terror against U.S. indigenous peoples or the 200 years of slave trade.

Source: The CIAs Greatest Hits by Mark Zapezauer
Third World Traveller
www.thirdworldtraveler.com


Tell me oceanlab, who should we really be fearing???


Posted by oceanlab on Mar-23-2003 00:43:

i don't know who Zapezauer is off hand but here's a BBC link about Saddam.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1100529.stm

I am sure there are hundreds of bios on him


Posted by Möbius on Mar-23-2003 00:50:

quote:
Originally posted by oceanlab
i don't know who Zapezauer is off hand but here's a BBC link about Saddam.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1100529.stm

I am sure there are hundreds of bios on him


I am quite aware of what Saddam has done, and yes the world will be better without him.

But you simply don't see my point so I won't bother posting in this thread anymore.


Posted by dEsidEL on Mar-23-2003 00:52:

KarateKid

http://www.gulfwardrinkinggame.com/

the gulf war two drinking game

drink when:


bush is called a crusader
x2 if its by saddam
saddam is called evil
x2 if its by bush
iraq troops surrender to the media
x2 if to a unmanned vehicle or inanimate object
iraq uses weapons it claims not to have
the united states uses weapons it won't allow iraq to have
a member of the media gets shot at
a toast to the shooter if its ashleigh banfield(msnbc), geraldo riviera(fox) or arron brown(cnn)
saddam uses a scud he doesnt have
x2 if its towards Israel
the united states terrorist threat level changes
the united states government tries to link iraq to 9-11
france goes pro US invasion
germany takes the side of the united states in a global war
Dominique de Villepin reminds you of that annoying rich kid in high school
someone implies tony blair is bush's bitch
someone implies scott ritter is Saddam's bitch
anybody 'warns' anybody
the word "escalation" is used
iraq and the united states are shown seated next to each other in the united nations
an American is shot down over iraq
x2 if an iraqi makes in into an aircraft
an American is shot,
x2 if its by an enemy
the media compares the war to blackhawk down
x2 if its because a blackhawk really goes down
a puppet government is installed in iraq
x2 if its by the puppet government installed in the US
saddam uses the word 'Zionist'
x2 if its bin laden
you change your opinion on the war
the media shows iraqi children in a hospital because of international sanctions
x2 if its because of american military action
finish your drink if saddam actually put them there, but claimed it was the united states
iraq promises full and complete cooporation with inspectors
Iraqi civilians greet Americans with cheers
x2 if its with bullets
the saudis do something the united states accuses iraq of doing
north korea does something the united states accused iraq of doing
x2 if they don't get away with it
al-jazeera is referred to as the "arab cnn"
finish your drink if cnn is referred to as the "american al-jazeera"
the conflict is compared to the vietnam war
x2 if the word "quagmire" is used
saddam goes missing
finish your drink if he is confimed killed
the pope is said to "pray for peace"
bush mispronounces the word 'nuclear'
finish your drink if its referring to a bomb that has gone off
richard armitage's neck shows up
if you can't find kuwait, bahrain, qatar, oman, or the united arab emirates on a map
x2 if you even own a map of the region
finish your drink if you can pronounce them all correctly
any of the following commentators are on tv:
x1 ken pollack, khidhir hamza, general wesley clark, col david hackworth, general bernard trainor, david kay, richard butler, thomas friedman, scott ritter, thomas andrews, anybody running for United States President
x2 general norman schwarzkopf, general walt boomer, general buster glosson, brent scowcroft, james baker, richard perle, william kristol, james woolsey, henry kissinger
x3 any former united states president
an actor or actress expresses an opinion on the war
x2 if this is the first time you've seen them in a year
an american reminds the french of world war one and two
x2 if a frenchman reminds the americans of the revolutionary war
saddam torches the oil fields
someone reports from "the arab street"
colin powell looks exasperated sitting at the u.n. security council
x2 if its because a country you didnt know exists is commenting on the war
anyone in the bush administration says "make no mistake"
the american military are told what to do by someone with no military experience
x2 if they dodged the vietnam draft
x3 if they dodged the vietnam draft, are an ex-governer of a southern us state, and ever held or holds the title of 'commander-in-chief'
tariq azziz's glasses get larger
somebody says saddam "tortures his own people"
you momentarly confuse george roberston with shrek
an arab country staging american troops speaks against the war
an arrow anti-missle missle is fired
x2 if it intercepts something
tom ridge laughs while discussing potential terrorists attacks
God picks a side
finish your drink if its not yours
somebody implies a blood for oil trade may be in progress
x2 if that person owns a S.U.V.
a protest sign attacks Bush directly
x2 if it attacks saddam directly
The united states bombs anything in iraq before the fighting 'offically' starts
x2 if iraq tries the same thing
Saddam is compared to Hitler
x2 if bush is compared to Hitler
someone compares the size of iraq to california or france
The media refers to itself as 'embedded'
someone says "shock and awe"
The words "Weapon(s) of Mass Destruction" are used
x2 if its shortned to "WMD"
A US Official uses the word "liberate"
Bush says "innocent civilians"
Bush quotes scripture
x2 saddam quotes the koran
Somebody says "between Iraq and a hard place"
A videophone craps out
x2 the anchor apologizes for it
Someone on TV says something contradictory to what is on their news ticker
A news correspondent asks if they can still be heard
x2 if they say "Can you hear me now?"
x3 if it is followed by a verizon wireless comercial
Any political or military leader refers to Australia
Saddam shoots a gun into the air
Saddam refers to George Bush as "little Bush" or "junior bush"
you see soldiers in gas masks
x2 if they were actually necessary
an initial news report turns out to be false
x2 if the anchor openly admits it
this game is mentioned in the news
x2 if the bush twins are playing it
Bush directly addresses Iraqis
x2 Saddam directly addresses Americans
a saddam body double is seen
someone refers to "coalition of the willing"
x2 if is because a member is actually providing combat troops
someone refers to 'Halliburton'
Media cameras on the baghdad skyline focus on something that looks like an erect penis
someone reminds us that osama bin laden is still alive
x2 if he reminds us himself
The media refuses to report something because of operational security
x2 if its immediately followed by a commentator telling what will happen next
the media reports that something "is not the start of the war"
x2 if it involves any act of war
the military learns of something for the first time from the media
someone uses the term "cradle of civilization"
ari fleischer lies
x2 if it is directly to helen thomas
anybody says something about exercising a right to protest
x2 if its added that it what the troops are fighting for
on the baghdad cam, a car runs a red light
x2 if it stops
x3 if its during a bombing
any coalition representative mentions securing oil fields
x2 if immediatly followed by "for the benefit of the iraqi people"

wanna suggest? [email protected]
$Revision: 1.22 $


Posted by Ray_Finkle on Mar-23-2003 00:52:

LKD, you tell me to open my mind. You tell others that they are wrong and you call people out when they provide sources for their statements. Not once in this whole thread have you provided ONE IOTA of credible and reliable sources to back up your view. You are relying on "people who you know in Iraq". Guys, Noone should listen to a thing LKD says unless he can back it all up with credible information. I have been constantly giving this ignorant person sources that back up my points. What does this guy do? Insults me for not having a broad mind or some shit like that. I have been constantly trying to get this guy and others to answer easily answerable questions yet he can't. He has no answer for it. He has provided nothing that could be considered reliable in the 12 pages that this thread takes up. LKD relies on hearsay. I use journalism which comes from reliable sites. Atleast with journalism, it is verified. Imagine how bad CNN would look if they carried fake news so they don't. I ask anyone here if they actually can take LKD for face value in this thread. He has done nothing to prove his point and I'm calling him out on it


Posted by Time2Burn on Mar-23-2003 00:56:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
http://www.gulfwardrinkinggame.com/

the gulf war two drinking game



Damn I'm drunk ALREADY!


Pages (24): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.