TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- Dick Chest Man Is Coming..
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Aesthetic on Apr-10-2003 07:23:

Dick Chest Man Is Coming..

all the people looking forward to a man with a dick chest wouldnt be so happy up until this point..

interesting debate i was having with a friend the other day.. what kind of turntables do you guys most prefer? personally ive only really ever used the technics 1200's.. so i cant really say the pros and cons about many others.. but i do know that the vestax ones were a bunch of junk..


Posted by Paulie on Apr-10-2003 07:26:

Neville Fucking Bartos.......... That u mate!!!!!!


Posted by Pointy on Apr-10-2003 07:27:

[I did not say a thing...honest]


Posted by radicool on Apr-10-2003 08:22:

i've used:

-citronic PT2
-gemini SA600 (the one I have now)
-technis SL1200 (my mate has them)

overall the technis is the best, but i'm happy with my gemini at the moment because it cost me $1000 less than technis anyway


Posted by matt_a on Apr-10-2003 09:26:

I have used
American DJ Direct Drive TT (I have these)
Technics 1200's (Mates Place)

The technics are better, but my American DJs are about $1000 cheaper that the Technics for 2, but they've never had a problem, and they are fine, not as much torque, but i mean they are perfect otherwise. Perfectly usable. Especially for poor students like me who dont have a spare $1600 floating around for 1200's

Plus now I wont buy 1200's
Numark have released the TTx1
These own all Turntables. Like 3 times the torque of 1200's
KICK ASS!


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 09:32:

Since when did 'turntables you own' become the topic?


Posted by Pointy on Apr-10-2003 09:52:

Dave keeps changing the topic in his first post..lol

As for the turntable debacle. I've used use Technics, Statons n Gemini...Technics just take the cake. As a amatuer - mucked around with turntables for a max 10 hours...the technics kickass Those TTx's might have the torque, but is that consistant torque or just start-up torque? There's a major difference. Plus nothin will beat the Technics, they're solid..and a lil plastic piece of poo from Numark wont topple em


Posted by gumble on Apr-10-2003 10:03:

I've used technics, and only technics.
Well for any length of time, I've mucked about on some others.

I really don't see any need to use others :/


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 10:05:

Oh well,

Rightio, i'm quite happy with me 2x Technics SL-1200 MK3D's


Posted by matt_a on Apr-10-2003 10:12:

Well check it out for yourself

Id rather have these babies than 1200's!

http://www.ttx1.com/


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 10:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Chuck Norris
Rightio, i'm quite happy with me 2x Technics SL-1200 MK3D's



Posted by Pointy on Apr-10-2003 10:36:

Heeheheh..its just a typical japanese piece of poo. Whats the deal with them making transformers out of everything, with all these buldges n colours n grooves. The sleek techs beat your ass anyday!

yo Alex, how much did you get ur mk3's for? Did you buy 2nd hand or brand spanky new?


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 10:51:

Brand spanking second hand with mixer (DJM-500) and headphones included. All together it was around something like $2800.


Posted by Pointy on Apr-10-2003 10:54:

I hate you so much.


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 10:55:

Stfu Nick, it's called the Trading Post mate.


Posted by Pointy on Apr-10-2003 10:58:

****** Sandy


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 10:59:

Nick Dick


Posted by Pointy on Apr-10-2003 11:03:

Sandy muddafuckar


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 11:09:

Dick Sucker


Posted by Aesthetic on Apr-10-2003 11:24:

settle down ladies or dickchest man with his chesticles will bounce into action and teach you all a lesson..

i dont know anything about these new gadgets you're talking about because im a typical taurian who doesnt like change and enjoys walking on the beach and all that kind of bullshit.. but i remember there were these plastic gay things around a few years ago and they bit the dust, the actual record was raised like 3x the plate of the technics and it just looked retarded... anyone rememebr these?


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 11:28:

Seeing as though there will be alot of people saying this, we'll count.

#1

WTF?


Posted by webmeister on Apr-10-2003 11:32:

Dude



Lay off the crack.


Posted by JayKuE on Apr-10-2003 11:38:

dick chest men and their chesticles.
laf. dave, change ur avatar dude. seriously! it hurts my eyes!



as for those jap gadgets, i dunno. do u really need such extras with a turntable? simplicity is best, nice torque and an accurate pitch control is all u need i think. i own techs 1200 n have used some stanton str80s which r supposed to be modelled on the techs and while they're not too bad, they're pretty sensitive, so techs r still preferred. wouldnt mind a go at other tables tho.

and yea, trading post pointy. its the way to go!


Posted by Aesthetic on Apr-10-2003 11:50:

tranceboy, the guys in your avator are almost as ugly as the guys in mine..

and the turntables i was referring to must be the vestax ones which looked like they were plastic toys..

this was too hard to understand?


Posted by Chuck Norris on Apr-10-2003 12:20:

1. They are quite small i don't know how you could possibly tell how good looking they are, also the Geezer always looks trashed in photos. If you would like i'll upload.

2. I didn't know what you were talking about, yes they do look like toys


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.