TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- US Gay Marriage Ban??? wtf
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »
US Gay Marriage Ban??? wtf
Has anyone else seen this horseshit put forward by Bill Frist?? Goddamn I hate religious conservatives. However, it appears that Bush is hesistant to endorse such an amendment which is surprising.
Hopefully gay republicans will speak out and divide the vote such that this bs won't be passed. At any rate I highly doubt something like this would actually make it through congress.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS....gay/index.html
CRAZY shit. it's insane the way people are becoming less and less tolerant of others. The neo-cons, on the other hand, want to make gay sex illegal, even if the couple is in the privacy of their own home.
Actually people are becoming MORE tolerant. I think I saw a poll on CNN or somewhere where the number of people that think gay sex is ok has been ever increasing since the 70's. It's just the few bible belt south states that have idiot representatives who come up with crazy amendments about all sorts of crap. Hehehe even though I think it's retarded, I secretely gloat whenever the US supreme court makes silly decisions such as striking down the saying of the pledge of alliegance in school (because of the God comment), and all sorts of other wierd decisions about hte separation of church and state. WTF comes out of Tennessee anyway except for elvis and homophobe congressmen???
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider of alliegance in school (because of the God comment0 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider Actually people are becoming MORE tolerant. I think I saw a poll on CNN or somewhere where the number of people that think gay sex is ok has been ever increasing since the 70's. It's just the few bible belt south states that have idiot representatives who come up with crazy amendments about all sorts of crap. Hehehe even though I think it's retarded, I secretely gloat whenever the US supreme court makes silly decisions such as striking down the saying of the pledge of alliegance in school (because of the God comment), and all sorts of other wierd decisions about hte separation of church and state. WTF comes out of Tennessee anyway except for elvis and homophobe congressmen??? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DrummeRaver86 I think that there have been some serious proposals to permanently strike the "God" clause in schools. And nothing else comes out of Tennessee, o wait...AL GORE!!!!!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider I'm all for separation of church and state, but things like that are just silly. What's next ... removing the in god we trust from the currency? |
No, no, guys, the word "God" is still required in schools.
Remember how a guy from Cali tried to challenge that, and then everybody -- like 99% of the people and the unanimous Congress -- started yelling at him and making threats against him.
Back to the topic: All these Southern Bible-beltists are retarded, but they wield enormous power in this country in terms of social policies. The US is different from Canada, Europe, Australia, and other democracies. Our country is rooted in Puritanic traditions and it's solidly Christian in its government, policies, and voting base (despite all the ado about "diversity", "melting pot", etc.)
As a matter of fact, Canada is more of a melting pot than America. They have more immigrants there, and there's little or no debate about "national character" or how those immigrants "fit into" something "one" and "patriotic."
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DrummeRaver86 True. Again, this whole notion of being "politically correct". |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider Perhaps they should change the phrase to "in nothing deemed offensive we trust" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider Perhaps they should change the phrase to "in nothing deemed offensive we trust" |
It is very ironic that the US, whic claims to have literally invented civil rights, remains so backward and bigoted still, compared to countries that never even had "civil rights revolutions" or other dramatic "freedom" events -- and which are, paradoxically, freer and more tolerant.
Consider the example of prostitution.
Prostitution is legal everywhere except the US and the Muslim world.
It's legal in Europe, Latin America, Canada, Australia, Mexico, democratized Asian countries, ... But not in the #1 democracy in the world.
How's that for separation of church and state? 
^That's what I always think about, how I can't stand these ultra-patriotic Americans who claim the US has so many freedoms, blah blah blah. In reality, we are restricted a lot more than other countries, such as like you said with prostitution, but also possession of pot. There are probably others but I'm too lazy to post them.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Eugene It is very ironic that the US, whic claims to have literally invented civil rights, remains so backward and bigoted still, compared to countries that never even had "civil rights revolutions" or other dramatic "freedom" events -- and which are, paradoxically, freer and more tolerant. Consider the example of prostitution. Prostitution is legal everywhere except the US and the Muslim world. It's legal in Europe, Latin America, Canada, Australia, Mexico, democratized Asian countries, ... But not in the #1 democracy in the world. How's that for separation of church and state? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DrummeRaver86 BTW: Eugene, who is that in your avatar? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DrummeRaver86 The prostitution point is an excellent example of the backwards thinking that is evident in American culture. I can point out another thing like that. In europe, it is a common gretting to give two kisses, one on either cheek. here, people are beginning to do it, but many still find it rather...well...homosexual. BTW: Eugene, who is that in your avatar? |
| quote: |
that's the "girl next door" from Denmark cute, isn't she? they're all like that there @ occrider - where exactly in the DC area are you? I live in Baltimore but I'm in DC all the time (mostly Bethesda & northwestern DC) |
| quote: |
| Consider the example of prostitution. Prostitution is legal everywhere except the US and the Muslim world. It's legal in Europe, Latin America, Canada, Australia, Mexico, democratized Asian countries, ... But not in the #1 democracy in the world. |
| quote: |
| Right around the Georgetown area on 37th St. I hit up glow all the time ... you? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Superstar uhh... I don't know about that. Prostitution is definately not legal in Canada. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vesa Neocons have also written some puritanic opinions lately on the pages of their paper Daily Standard |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Eugene Another pro-Republican, pro-Bush, radically neo-conservative right-wing newspaper is the Washington Times. http://www.washingtontimes.com/ (NOTE: Don't confuse it with the Washington Post. The Post is the #1 newspaper and is very good, objective, and more liberal.) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DrummeRaver86 I was gettin scared there until I read the NOTE. I was wondering with the Washington Post would write that Neo-Con bullshit... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Eugene As a matter of fact, Canada is more of a melting pot than America. They have more immigrants there, and there's little or no debate about "national character" or how those immigrants "fit into" something "one" and "patriotic." |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Cyrus King I think "in god we trust" should be removed from money because it is religious... and thee are many people who dont even beleive in a god. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vesa To be fair to Weekly Standard after all my bashing, some of its articles at least admit that homosexuality is largely genetic, in contrast to the Christian hardline view of a disease or lifestyle disorder: http://members.aol.com/gaygene/pages/standard.htm However, the writer's thoughts on the possible elimination of the effects of the homosexuality gene may have less than noble intentions, leaving open the possibility of illegalizing homosexual behaviour. So Neocons are moralists who want to separate the issues of legality and biological inclination. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.