TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Looking for some advice...


Posted by Tygon on Aug-11-2003 07:59:

Looking for some advice...

This thread comes after a reply I made to DJAdamSmith about getting started: http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...465#post1723465

This is a snip from my past, however as I said, I'm ready to take the plunge. I'm looking to drop anywhere from 10-15k within the next few months to purchase some of the euqpiment I need to get started. The funds aren't a problem, but my knowledge of equipment is a little soft. So I'm looking to you guys for some advice on some of the neccesities I'll need.

Off the bat, I need a mixer, a couple drum machines (one of which would probably be a tr-808), at least 3 keyboards (I've been considering the Access Virus C, Korg Triton, and the Karma), and several effects procesors, compressors, etc (these I really know nothing about except what I've learned in reason). With my limited knowledge, that's what I've come up with.

I'm really looking for any recommendations, advice for getting started, and feedback you guys might have for me... I'm VERY open minded at this point and I'll take any and all comments.

Thanks!


Posted by TranceInMySoul on Aug-11-2003 18:42:

I'm gonna challenge you on why you think you need hardware. You could spend a few grand on a hot computer and some software and make tracks that are just as good

If you're absolutely certain about spending the extra money and going with hardware, think about a dedicated sampler.

Consider what is going to be doing your sequencing (maybe a computer)?

Do you need a Triton? Do you need a Karma? Don't spend money at this stage just because it's available.

The Virus C is popular synth and I don't think you'd go far wrong with one. Be prepared to invest some time learning how to use it though - don't just stick with the presets!


Posted by Tygon on Aug-11-2003 21:37:

I've been using software synths and drum machines for years now along side of a couple pieces of equipment (Rolland mc505 and a nice Rolland Keyboard.. all I could really afford at the time). I've concluded... there's nothing like the real thing. There's nothing like playing on weighted keys, there's nothing like turning the cut/res knobs, there's nothing like controlling your equipment without having to click a mouse. My intent is obviously to learn how to use the equipment if I were to buy it. There's no point on dropping a couple grand on a keyboard if i'm just gonna use their sample programming. I know Cubase, I know Cakewalk, and I believe that the potential to hardware is far greater than software. I've seen and heard the difference.

So now I'm gonna challenge you... if you think software's just as good as hardware, why are professional studios filled with equipment?


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Aug-11-2003 22:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Dizc

So now I'm gonna challenge you... if you think software's just as good as hardware, why are professional studios filled with equipment?


Right back at you:

Since professional studios are filled with hardware why are most fresh new talents (Aspiration, Haak, Masters & Nickson etc.) using software yet they manage to match the sound quality of the "pro" studios?

Don't ask what to use, ask how.


Posted by dbl on Aug-11-2003 22:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Right back at you:

Since professional studios are filled with hardware why are most fresh new talents (Aspiration, Haak, Masters & Nickson etc.) using software yet they manage to match the sound quality of the "pro" studios?

Don't ask what to use, ask how.


i'm all with mr mystery


Posted by Tygon on Aug-11-2003 22:32:

Toucher...

I guess I just like the feel of actual hardware. Software's great and by no means would I stray away from the things I use now, but there's just something about touching the keys and controlling it with knobs and buttons without having to use a mouse. I'm also attracted to the idea that I could control many different voices from one key, or a series of keys. I've also been under the impression that hardware will give you a richer, fuller sound.

Am I mislead in believing that dedicated hardware is better than software (that shares your Processor with a complete OS, shares your RAM with other background software, and shares your hard drive with other temp data)? True, with the money I would save on equipment, I could buy a sweet ass system where these wouldn't be issues, but I've never found computer sound cards to be as powerful as dedicated hardware. Are you guys really trying to tell me that if I dropped 15 grand on hardware, that I would get no more sound wise out of it than a $2000 PC with maybe $1000 worth of software?


Posted by J.L. on Aug-11-2003 22:41:

I do agree with the hands-on approach with hardware is better than software. However, most of us don't have that much money to spend so we usually prefer software. But software is also evolving and improving rapidly and you see better and better programs and vst's being released not monthly but weekly.


Posted by Tygon on Aug-11-2003 23:17:

quote:
Don't ask what to use, ask how.


BTW, very good point...

SO maybe rather than blowing the bank on all hardware, split it up. Get a couple pieces of hardware to give me the hands on control that I'm looking for (weighted keys, knobs, buttons and toys) and invest in some great software also. I'm starting to see a great argument here from you guys.

I'm just having a hard time, I think, because I've compared tracks created strictly on software to pro studios and they still sound computerized to me... They still sound very electronic. This is good in a lot of cases, especially in trance music, but I'm still somewhat a fan of a good analog sound too. It gives you a more live/real sound. I guess for the same reason as DJs still generally prefer vinyl to CDs. It just sounds better live... and this was my assumption in wanting to buy equipment rather than ust using software.


Posted by DjSimonB on Aug-12-2003 00:46:

Looks like a bit of a hardware/software debate starting here... I think that software's becoming as good as hardware for producing electronic music, soon, or maybe even now, it'll just be a matter of personal preference


Posted by hey cheggy on Aug-12-2003 03:05:

I use both and I'd have to say I prefer both the feel and the sound of hardware synths over software.

What I suggest though is that you buy each piece seperately rather than all at once. Go and get a decent synth and a sampler and a mixer and then get the other stuff later on, after you feel compitent using the synth and sampler. Otherwise, you'll end up with all this stuff and no idea how to use any of it to its potential.

As for a tr-808, I would suggest something a little more modern and adaptable, like a machine drum or a d-station or something.


Posted by arctic on Aug-12-2003 11:25:

You can always combine the two. My setup is mainly software, but i do use a midi keyboard as well

But generally, i agree with Mr. Mystery...not what but how.


Posted by DJMikeyP on Aug-16-2003 09:44:

Hardware/Software - its all such a funny thing... Inside the hardware is the software that runs the hardware heehee. I think for some reason the hardware people just got their hands on better formulas or something - maybe they could afford more research because hardware makes them more money than software, I dunno.

One thing I do know, is that even when the day comes that teh software companies finally outsmart the hardware companies and both sound the same, I'll still like the feel of hardware.... Theres something so so special about being able to say, "I'm absolutely on my own - I don't have to worry about speed/memory/mouse limitations and hinderences... Just push the buttons and make what I want"... I kind of feel naked when that happens, like I finally lost my excuse as to why the music sounds mediocre... But then again thats a good thing.


Posted by Alccode on Aug-16-2003 16:01:

quote:
Originally posted by DJMikeyP
One thing I do know, is that even when the day comes that teh software companies finally outsmart the hardware companies and both sound the same, I'll still like the feel of hardware.... Theres something so so special about being able to say, "I'm absolutely on my own - I don't have to worry about speed/memory/mouse limitations and hinderences... Just push the buttons and make what I want"... I kind of feel naked when that happens, like I finally lost my excuse as to why the music sounds mediocre... But then again thats a good thing.


Nah, just get a MIDI controller and you can have the best of both worlds: the feel of hardware AND the software excuse for mediocre music!

Personally, if we were to consider that the end result of hardware and software is the same, I would still lean towards software because hardware can be broken. The worst that can happen with your software is that you have to reinstall it. But if you have a broken transistor or transducer or defibrulator in your hardware, then you have to spend a lot of money to have it serviced and/or replaced. Not to mention the hassle.


Posted by josh on Aug-19-2003 03:27:

i agree with Alccode.

agree with mr mystery and some others..

its so agrumentative. there always right and alwayr wrong.
pple find s/w better. reinstall safe. by using mouse, kinda sensitive.
hardware - the feel of the knob easy to control..

but come to think, compressor can use in s.w there much thing u can use on s/w also. jsut simply get a hardware which u nromally be using.

and ya qtn way out of point of that. u may have good equipment, do u think u spend so much will do? mean nothing of that. wat i trying to say, u are good, u do a good music no matter wat are u using.

dun bother of h/w s/w thingy. if u find u use more on certain thing, get the h/w. seldomly usage, use s/w.

for me a syth, a mixer and a drum machine will do. need not a high end product. koz, its all in ur mind how the music sound like. no point getting hi end but yet u cant produce great tracks. it the creative of how u do.

my 2 cents.


Posted by SgtFoo on Aug-19-2003 04:28:

straight out of the industry standard of audio production, I'm gonna give you one name... Pro-Tools. www.digidesign.com

Spend the cash to get a home version fot eh pro-tools setup. Spend the rest of what you need to on a computer dedicated to running that. Then get a signal digitizer (I think that's what you call it) and run it from your keyboard(s) to your computer. Have about 3 to 5 or as many as you want to get of instrument synths and/or drum-machines, and run that to your keyboard(s). that setup is just enough, while guided mainly and based on the pro-tools system to make pretty much anything that a large hardware or software studio can do. Yes the pro-tools setup is a hardware/software hybrid.... that's the bestway to do it.


Posted by arctic on Aug-19-2003 07:19:

quote:
Originally posted by SgtFoo
straight out of the industry standard of audio production, I'm gonna give you one name... Pro-Tools. www.digidesign.com

Spend the cash to get a home version fot eh pro-tools setup. Spend the rest of what you need to on a computer dedicated to running that. Then get a signal digitizer (I think that's what you call it) and run it from your keyboard(s) to your computer. Have about 3 to 5 or as many as you want to get of instrument synths and/or drum-machines, and run that to your keyboard(s). that setup is just enough, while guided mainly and based on the pro-tools system to make pretty much anything that a large hardware or software studio can do. Yes the pro-tools setup is a hardware/software hybrid.... that's the bestway to do it.


...Or just follow in the footsteps of Guyver, Gaz West aka Dark By Design, Klassic & Sanders, Ronski speed etc and just use fl


Posted by josh on Aug-19-2003 12:55:

definetly i agree... pro- tools. i thumbs up..


Posted by dbl on Aug-19-2003 13:36:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
...Or just follow in the footsteps of Guyver, Gaz West aka Dark By Design, Klassic & Sanders, Ronski speed etc and just use fl


flutlicht, cosmic gate.........................


exactly


Posted by SgtFoo on Aug-20-2003 17:02:

quote:
Originally posted by dbl
flutlicht, cosmic gate.........................


exactly



Oh don't get me wrong!!... I love FL!!!! FL is also great! but it's a lot cheaper than $15000, so I gave him something more within the budget. And besides, you can use FL with the same setup I described, instead of Pro-tools.
It's just that the college I'm going to boasts about industry standards and pro-tools is it.


Posted by Tygon on Aug-20-2003 20:23:

quote:
Originally posted by SgtFoo
straight out of the industry standard of audio production, I'm gonna give you one name... Pro-Tools. www.digidesign.com

Spend the cash to get a home version fot eh pro-tools setup. Spend the rest of what you need to on a computer dedicated to running that. Then get a signal digitizer (I think that's what you call it) and run it from your keyboard(s) to your computer. Have about 3 to 5 or as many as you want to get of instrument synths and/or drum-machines, and run that to your keyboard(s). that setup is just enough, while guided mainly and based on the pro-tools system to make pretty much anything that a large hardware or software studio can do. Yes the pro-tools setup is a hardware/software hybrid.... that's the bestway to do it.


That's excellent advice. You guys have really educated me on this (seemingly) huge issue. The bottom line, I guess, is that everyone has their own style and their own production techniques. Money isn't necessarily an issue here, but I'm glad to hear software has come such a long way.

I think you've got the right idea for what I need toa ccomplish, SgtFoo. I'm definetly gonna look into ProTools. And a new computer is a given (things just don't run quite right on a PIII 450 anymore ) lol

PEACE

-=Tygon=-



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.