TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Your Definition of Cheese


Posted by xTranceGurlx on Sep-19-2003 16:20:

Your Definition of Cheese

ok ok ok... well im not the expert with this but i thought i had a good idea of what cheese tunes were... but ive noticed some people have different definitions of this word.. Im gettting a little confused *sigh* lets seeeeeeee let me know what ur definition of this word is.. and give some examples of the artist/song u think are cheesy


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Sep-19-2003 16:25:

A track which took no talent to make and produce, and is aimed purely at commercial success.

OR a track which sounds really cringingly bad or out of place, i.e something that is trying to sound cool but ends up terrible.


Posted by Walter Mindz on Sep-19-2003 16:38:

Those epic tracks... here's some new ones... pure cheese!!!
Robert Gitelman - "Hatikva"
Cern - "The Message (Northern Mix)" -->doesn't sound that bad a first but then it's ruined half way through when the breakdown begins and gets into the typical epic crap!


Posted by Lira on Sep-19-2003 17:06:





Seriously now, "cheese" is a highly subjective thing: this is what may be confusing you. The best explanation I've heard about cheese is: It was once milk and after all those chemical reactions it becomes something that you don't even know if you can consider it food anymore. Get the analogy? Cheese is anything that tries too hard to be something else, but this is not necessarily a bad thing: Happy Hardcore is sure cheesy, but I find it more interesting than most prog I hear (prog seems to be the antithesis of cheese lately, that's why I chose it, but I could've chosen loads of other genres). Will I argue with prog-heads? No way, they won't change my mind and I won't change theirs.

Want a tip? don't waste your time thinking about what's cheesy and what's not. Listen to what you like and have fun


Posted by udham on Sep-19-2003 17:08:

What Maaz said .. listen to lotsa stuff and develop your own definition of cheese.


Posted by Psionic on Sep-19-2003 17:33:

I believe there were two threads about this already...


Posted by starglider on Sep-19-2003 18:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Walter Mindz
Those epic tracks... here's some new ones... pure cheese!!!
Robert Gitelman - "Hatikva"
Cern - "The Message (Northern Mix)" -->doesn't sound that bad a first but then it's ruined half way through when the breakdown begins and gets into the typical epic crap!


I'm amused that you list Cern - The Message as "cheese" while mentioning Euphonic - Asia in your sig, considering Asia is equally "epic" in a hands-in-the-air sense.

Unfortunately, people like Walter tend to use the term cheese to mean anything that they're too cool to listen to. Around here, some of the more sexually frustrated progheads will call any melodic trance cheese, so be careful who you ask.

So basically we all have our own ideas of what makes a track "cheesy" (I dislike the term), but I might be so bold as to say that my definition seems quite good.

A track is "cheese" if any of the following apply:

1. It contains significant vocal content that adds nothing to the track and/or detracts from the listening experience.

2. It is gimmicky; it contains a melody (or other element) that doesn't stand up to multiple listens.

3. It is overly simple/unrefined in terms of production and/or originality/complexity.

This is not to say that vocal trance is, by definition, cheese, nor that catchy equates to poor, nor that a simple track cannot be effective. And of course the above rules are relative and highly debatable. But it's a start...


Posted by mizzuno on Sep-19-2003 18:16:

the prog heads feel anyting with a melody is cheesey...reminds me of the house freaks...


Mizz


Posted by MrMiyagi on Sep-19-2003 19:54:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
A track which took no talent to make and produce, and is aimed purely at commercial success.


so basically any original work by Ferry Corsten, hahaha... actually, i like his remixes...


Posted by dJohn on Sep-19-2003 20:23:

Two words: WHO CARES
Listen to what you like, and don't listen to what you don't like. Simple as that. Cheese is a relative definition based on ones personal taste. Consdiering music is all about personal preference, it wouldn't make sense to ask others what they think of as a bad song. Fuck what they think, and do as you please.


Posted by Aeryn on Sep-19-2003 20:30:

Smiley DJ

quote:
Originally posted by starglider


A track is "cheese" if any of the following apply:

1. It contains significant vocal content that adds nothing to the track and/or detracts from the listening experience.

2. It is gimmicky; it contains a melody (or other element) that doesn't stand up to multiple listens.

3. It is overly simple/unrefined in terms of production and/or originality/complexity.

This is not to say that vocal trance is, by definition, cheese, nor that catchy equates to poor, nor that a simple track cannot be effective. And of course the above rules are relative and highly debatable. But it's a start...


Dear god...I have stumbled into the cheesier-than-thou thread...
1. Vocals that add nothing to the content...yeah, ya know...like half of everything out there?
2. GIMMICKY? 99% of the recording industry is built on gimmicks and the like.
3. Simplistic or lacking in complexity? Music and rhythm and rhyme and harmony are the element of music, and everything is derived from them. In my opinions, the more simplistic a track is (no matter the layers involved) the better the song overall. In fact, progressive music is BUILT on the concept of simplicity.

Cheese has nothing at all to do with skill, or practical programming ability...rather it is a subjective term which those who are legens in their own minds, ya know...the "l33t d00dz" of the music community have determined to be such. Club trance is usually the first to fall into this category, however...there exists some anthems (See Silence, Zombie Nation, Ressurection, hell..even Sandstorm) that stand up to multiple listens, are amazingly simple, and have vocals that do nothing...


Posted by Viber on Sep-19-2003 20:46:

its in tuunel trance force 20+


Posted by Magnetonium on Sep-20-2003 02:17:

Satan (eek!) Say Cheeeeeese .....

But I guess I'd say ... it is just an awful waste of space ... you get the idea...

EURODANCE is cheese, baby. Z103 (TO's radio station) has just overplayed it, its so annoying, songs sound alike ... plus the whole gay community loves eurodance - total turn-off for me. No offence to anyone. As for non-dance&electronica music genres like rock, pop and rap ... that's much worse than cheese, what do you call that ...\


Posted by Magnetonium on Sep-20-2003 02:19:

Cool Agree!

quote:
Originally posted by Viber
[CHEESE] its in tunnel trance force 20+

Absolutely.


Posted by joeh on Sep-20-2003 02:45:

quote:
Originally posted by MrMiyagi
so basically any original work by Ferry Corsten, hahaha... actually, i like his remixes...


lol, nothing of ferry's has been commercially sucessful for 4 years.

If your using that criteria for selection whats cheesy, how about going for Paul Van Dyk? He outsells ferry, but obviously he isnt cheese.

I would also like to remind all the prog heads that sasha is signed to a pop music label.


Posted by montie on Sep-20-2003 02:46:

one definintion of cheese could be a song that is catchy and appeals to the masses, but isn't able to hold a long attatchment to the masses.

if you wanna use general music, you can use say the backstreet boys. they were huge for a while, and eventually their fame died out.
then you compare that to say pink floyd's dark side of the moon. an absolute masterpiece that appealed the masses and is still loved to this day.

now in the electronic dance music world i'd consider most club anthems cheese. stuff that your run of the mill person who really doesn't know much about dance music loves. like DJ sammy - heaven.
but hey, theres nothing wrong with likeing it.
when i first got into electronica i listend to sandstorm all the time.
along with ATB, and DJ Jean - the launch, and zombie nation - kernkraft 400 .
when i was into this stuff, i remember i heared john digweed's GU Los Angeles and Bedrock albums, and i thought it was soooooooooooooooo boring. i was like what the hell is this. nothing is happening .

not until i had really listend for a long time and started DJing, did i really get into the music that would be considered "good" or "not cheesey."

but really in the end though, it all comes down to subjectivity. just listen to what you like. thats what its all about. don't be detered from your music just because someone else puts it down. listen to what they have to say, but continue to listen to what you like. tastes tend to change over time.


Posted by montie on Sep-20-2003 02:49:

quote:
Originally posted by joeh
If your using that criteria for selection whats cheesy, how about going for Paul Van Dyk? He outsells ferry, but obviously he isnt cheese.



we are aliiiiiiiiiiive iiiiive iiiiiive.......





I love PvD. he's a great DJ, and i enjoy his songs. i wouldnt say that they weren't cheese though


Posted by Basil Rush on Sep-30-2003 14:28:

Surely a cheesy track is like one of those photo's where everyone's been asked to say "Cheese" for the cliched classic pose....



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.