lets see who is smart here 2 !! - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- lets see who is smart here 2 !!

Posted by caddyshack on Oct-09-2003 06:41:

lets see who is smart here 2 !!

who can prove that all the zeros of the Dirichlet eta function, strictly between 0 and 1, all lie on the line 1/2?

Dirichlet eta function

Posted by caddyshack on Oct-09-2003 07:01:

where you at orbax??

Posted by DigiNut on Oct-09-2003 07:31:

Well shit, this looks a lot like what we're learning in DSP.

Too bad I haven't gone to class or read the book in 3 weeks.

Posted by Streakfury on Oct-09-2003 09:30:

I got an IQ of 126, is that good?? ...and they said uni students are smart!!

Posted by tall paul 2 on Oct-09-2003 11:12:

Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

quote:
Originally posted by caddyshack
who can prove that all the zeros of the Dirichlet eta function, strictly between 0 and 1, all lie on the line 1/2?

Dirichlet eta function

i cant

Posted by Misty Kitty on Oct-09-2003 11:55:

i cant either

Posted by Hequn on Oct-09-2003 17:26:

the what what with the what what?

Posted by Nabistai on Oct-09-2003 17:29:

Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

quote:
Originally posted by caddyshack
who can prove that all the zeros of the Dirichlet eta function, strictly between 0 and 1, all lie on the line 1/2?

Dirichlet eta function

Damn you basterd, I have to study mathematics all damn week , I come here on TA to relax a bit and what do I see????

Posted by igottaknow on Oct-09-2003 17:50:

Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

quote:
Originally posted by caddyshack
who can prove that all the zeros of the Dirichlet eta function, strictly between 0 and 1, all lie on the line 1/2?

Looks like school is back in session sorry we're smart enuff to decline doining ur homework 4u.

Posted by drizzt81 on Oct-09-2003 18:17:

Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

Posted by DigiNut on Oct-09-2003 18:28:

Re: Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

quote:
Originally posted by drizzt81

there seems to be a zero @ ~-5 though :P

Those are intercepts. The question I believe is referring to zeros in the laplace domain, like poles.

Posted by whiskers on Oct-09-2003 20:18:

die... die... death... darkness... oblivion...

Posted by drizzt81 on Oct-09-2003 20:24:

Re: Re: Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Those are intercepts. The question I believe is referring to zeros in the laplace domain, like poles.
ahh.. we learned that x-intercepts were also referred to as zero's but I get the question now and i don't want to deal with it :P

Posted by whiskers on Oct-09-2003 21:45:

Re: lets see who is smart here 2 !!

quote:
Originally posted by caddyshack
who can prove that all the zeros of the Dirichlet eta function, strictly between 0 and 1, all lie on the line 1/2?

who cares... we're all gonna die anyway...

Posted by zarathustra on Oct-09-2003 22:32:

I don't think a complete proof of this exists yet. I guess it's time to start my master's thesis.

Posted by Shook1 on Oct-10-2003 01:07:

Let me guess........a take home test !!!

Posted by PhloTron on Oct-10-2003 01:50:

Easy...

Just use the Riemann Hypothesis on the function to determine the answer...well...the start to the answer. As far as I've seen the first 250 x 10^9 non trivial zeros lie on that line, proving that t < 70,925,843,233ish is true using this hypothesis. It is thus theoretical that there is an infinite # of zeros that lie on this line. But also a finite number.

It has yet to be proven, and there is a million bucks up for grabs to prove it, yet $0 for disproving the theory (wierd).

This was back in 2000, my last year of this math stuff....lol.

I see that all this data is on this site on various links...fun worthless crap

Posted by caddyshack on Oct-10-2003 04:18:

Just a joke guys, proving this would prove the riemann hypothesis, and since many of the best mathematicians to ever live have been stumped by this i did't expect anyone to get it. but if anyone thinks they got it there is a 1 million dollar reward!!

Posted by caddyshack on Oct-10-2003 04:19:

quote:
Originally posted by PhloTron
Easy...

Just use the Riemann Hypothesis on the function to determine the answer...well...the start to the answer. As far as I've seen the first 250 x 10^9 non trivial zeros lie on that line, proving that t < 70,925,843,233ish is true using this hypothesis. It is thus theoretical that there is an infinite # of zeros that lie on this line. But also a finite number.

It has yet to be proven, and there is a million bucks up for grabs to prove it, yet $0 for disproving the theory (wierd).

This was back in 2000, my last year of this math stuff....lol.

I see that all this data is on this site on various links...fun worthless crap

good job,i didn't see your post till after...