TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Figure these out and ill give you my TTs
Figure these out and ill give you my TTs
| quote: |
| The words in parethensis are (not) important |
| quote: |
| The sentence in red is false. The sentence in blue is true. |
BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER BADGER
MUSHROOM MUSHROOM!!!!
Re: Figure these out and ill give you my TTs
since there is only one word in the parenthesis, it is important.. simple. Should I pm you my address now, since i do need some TT's
1. The word "not" is important
2. The first sentence claims the first sentence is false, while the second one supports what the first sentence claims, yet we know that the first sentence says the second one is false, so they are both contradictions of each other. 
I don't get it, what is there to "figure out?"
Yes, they are logical paradoxes. Fascinating...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut Yes, they are logical paradoxes. Fascinating... |
I'm sorry we'll post things that are more worthy of your time, please don't shoot us sire!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mako I'm sorry we'll post things that are more worthy of your time, please to shoot us sire! |
Im sorry, but i dont realy have any TTs
.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Kamikaze Badger Im sorry, but i dont realy have any TTs . |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mako ffs, bastard conned us...you must die for this!! mods take care of him! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Linx_da_cat he's roadkill under my tire. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Linx_da_cat he's roadkill under my tire. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drizzt81 pics! |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Linx_da_cat |
| quote: |
Originally posted by Linx_da_cat |
The first one isn't a paradox.
Depends how you read it I suppose.
the second one is an example of the stroop effect. Thats where you are supposively "automatically processing" the word's meaning so that interferes with tring to name the color of the word. Works pretty much all the time and there has been like 700-800 published articles on it.
eh, and who cares about the first one.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Boomer187 eh, and who cares about the first one. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Boomer187 the second one is an example of the stroop effect. Thats where you are supposively "automatically processing" the word's meaning so that interferes with tring to name the color of the word. Works pretty much all the time and there has been like 700-800 published articles on it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by whiskers who cares about anything? we're all gonna die anyway... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut Nah, what you're talking about is true but it's not in any way related to the thing he posted. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Boomer187 ACtually I would think it would have something to do with it since the color named in each sentence is different than the color of the sentence. You initially think that the actual blue sentence is red so it is false and the real red sentence is thought to be blue so it is assumed true, yet a second later you figure out that what you thought was red is actually blue and what was thought to be blue is actually red which totally contradicts prior thinking..... lmao, man I suck at repling. bottom line is that the stroop effect adds to the confusion of the already confusing sentence. |
Well, I suppose the colour could be confusing if you're colourblind. 
But really it would be the exact same thing if written "The next sentence is false. The previous sentence is true."
Man, you guys are killing me. I'm with Greg, I need something to *fap* to.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Linx_da_cat |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.