TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- confused
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 00:29:

confused

Ok, so I'm making a website. Refer to the bottom pic:



I basically want the main page to be a set size (the white column down the middle), say 1024*768. And if the persons resolution is more, I want black columns down the sides, with the main page centered. How would I go about doing this (no details, just the general idea - tables, etc.).


Posted by DigiNut on Oct-24-2003 00:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Echo of Silence
(I learned you should use 800 pixels for width since most users still set their computers to 800p x 600p)

Most users where, in Upper Mongolia?

1024 x 768 is standard, 1280x1024 will probably overtake that in a year or two.


Posted by DigiNut on Oct-24-2003 00:58:

No need to take it personally, I was just pointing out your error so he doesn't propagate it.


Posted by electric_soul on Oct-24-2003 01:27:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Most users where, in Upper Mongolia?

1024 x 768 is standard, 1280x1024 will probably overtake that in a year or two.


www.thecounter.com says (as of May '03):
800x600: 44%
1024x768: 42%

link here

www.w3schools.com says that www.thecounter.com says () that as of Jul '03:
1024x768: 49%
800x600: 44%

link here

to see statistics of Jul '03 @ thecounter.com you gotta register, i wont, so w3schools.com could be saying crap (actually thecounter.com too ).

But based on that, you're disregarding 44% either way.

/me just codes, and html is handled by someone else, so couldn't care less


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 01:59:

800*600 is an unwritten rule.

use fixed tables for what you want to do, but you must be warned. When someone will try printing your webpage it will be cut off on the right side.


Posted by MrSquirrel on Oct-24-2003 02:13:

When designing a website ALWAYS deign for the least common denominator. That means putting alt tags on images, having some form of text navigation, and making it viewable on lower resolutions. 800x600 is a good one to use because many people still run at that resolution. Just because the graphics cards sold today can all handle 1024x768 easily does not mean everyone is using it. A lot of people use 15 in monitors still and unless you like to look at small text 1024x768 is too high a resolution for most people on that monitor size.

www.htmlgoodies.com is a good place to look for tutorials and pointers Turbonium....it is where I figured out how to do my javascripting of buttons

MrS


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 03:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Echo of Silence
Background: black
table background: white
table size: 1024 pixels, position centered

(I learned you should use 800 pixels for width since most users still set their computers to 800p x 600p)


he's right i think, overall

ok anyway, i made a table 955 pixels wide, etc. u get the idea.

on the second row of the table i'm putting text links ("buttons"). They are by % size (using css file). Problem is, if I go into my browser (IE6, not that it matters), and change the font size to larger, it spills over and makes a new line (I hope u know what I mean).

How can I fix this? My friend says GoLive has "grids" or something. Any equivalent in dreamweaver mx? Or anyone have a simpler solution to this problem?


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 04:25:

also guys, tables don't allow more than 1 space in a row, which is stupid. i compensated by making transparent GIF files (height 1 pixel, several pixels wide) and inserted them into where I needed spaces. Is this bad? I think so, it's too crude, and ups the page download time.

Any better solutions? Help would be greatly appreciated.


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 04:28:

1 space in a row?!?!?

what do you mean ?

you could always subdivide a cell into smaller cells by creating a nested table...


Posted by MrSquirrel on Oct-24-2003 04:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Turbonium
also guys, tables don't allow more than 1 space in a row, which is stupid. i compensated by making transparent GIF files (height 1 pixel, several pixels wide) and inserted them into where I needed spaces. Is this bad? I think so, it's too crude, and ups the page download time.

Any better solutions? Help would be greatly appreciated.


1 space in a row? I think you need to look into using cellpadding and cellborder. Check htmlgoodies they will explain almost anything you could want.

MrS


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 04:30:

I suck at this shit.

What I mean is, it's like this forum. You can make a post, and put in 50 spaces between 2 words, but it shows up as only 1 space. Try it.


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 04:43:

hahaaha


you need to use the special word   for each space

do i have it spelled right?


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 04:44:

& n b s p ;


just remove the spaces between the characters or else they won't appear in my post.


Posted by MrSquirrel on Oct-24-2003 04:47:

Like so                                                    fitty spaces for ya.

You really should read some form of HTML primer before building a site....like the aforementioned www.htmlgoodies.com . It will make a lot of this stuff easier to figure out.

MrS


Posted by DigiNut on Oct-24-2003 05:03:

You can use the nbsp, but that doesn't display properly in every locale.

Transparent GIFs are good, they're called "spacers". You should only make them 1 pixel by 1 pixel, though, it's not necessary to make them any larger because you specify the height/width it's scaled to in the HTML code.

As for people using 15" monitors and shit resolution, I seriously have to question how up-to-date those stats are. But if they are, then screw those people, even most laptops are 1024x768 or above, even the library computers here are 1024x768... if someone's too bloody cheap to get a half-decent monitor, I wouldn't want to try and sell something to them anyway.


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 05:46:

yeah but still, its not because you have a 1024 width screen that you can display a full 1024 width page... thats why people still use 800 width pages because they look nice on a 1024 monitor...

but indeed they look small on a 1200 display :/


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 14:02:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
You can use the nbsp, but that doesn't display properly in every locale.

Transparent GIFs are good, they're called "spacers". You should only make them 1 pixel by 1 pixel, though, it's not necessary to make them any larger because you specify the height/width it's scaled to in the HTML code.

As for people using 15" monitors and shit resolution, I seriously have to question how up-to-date those stats are. But if they are, then screw those people, even most laptops are 1024x768 or above, even the library computers here are 1024x768... if someone's too bloody cheap to get a half-decent monitor, I wouldn't want to try and sell something to them anyway.


About the GIFs, I actually called them spacers without knowing what they shuold be called, cool.

Anyway, I don't care about the resolution right now. I just want to figure out how to pull this thing off. I mean I know there's a way to do it, I just have to find out.

ahlamalek, I don't know what you mean by the spaces between & n b s p or whatever. Where you just testing what I said?


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 14:04:

quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek
yeah but still, its not because you have a 1024 width screen that you can display a full 1024 width page... thats why people still use 800 width pages because they look nice on a 1024 monitor...

but indeed they look small on a 1200 display :/


I'm doing my page 955 wide, so it still looks good on a 1024.


Posted by electric_soul on Oct-24-2003 14:15:

HTML doesn't care how many spaces there are on the document, it just renders one.

The only way to force it is using a non-breaking space:

 

so, if you want 5 spaces:      
(or just a regular space followed by 4 nbsps, or regular space, 3 nbsps, regular space, or alternate regular ones with nbsps ).

Although, you usually shouldn't need that kind of things.


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 14:31:

ok thanks, wasn't seeing that last night, way too tired...

for the spaces, I just used a 1x1 transparent pixel and stretched it accordingly, I figure that's better.

still, how do I solve this stupid problem where when the user changess the font text size in their browser, it spills over to a new line in the table... I basically want to make the text size unchangeable I guess.

Am I supposed to use pixels tod efine size, rather than percentage?


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 14:48:

ugh, you're playing a dangerous game here...

the game of "html is a poor interfacing language"... in other word, try to put as little constraints as possible, fixing table widths, font sizes, colors, etc is very hard to maintain in the long run and could nice in one browser and awful in anoter.

if you want to fix a certain text element, use an image. But if you're talking about the main content of your webpage, don't fix its size. its not good HTMLing


Posted by arleetec on Oct-24-2003 14:50:

Set the text to wahtever size you want it to be, I don't think the viewers of your webpage can change that.


Posted by malek on Oct-24-2003 14:53:

yes they can!


Posted by Turbonium on Oct-24-2003 15:49:

Ok ahlamalek, so you're saying replace the buttons with images?

ugh


Posted by electric_soul on Oct-24-2003 16:05:

quote:
Originally posted by arleetec
Set the text to wahtever size you want it to be, I don't think the viewers of your webpage can change that.


Even IExplorer which is the less customizable browser ever can change font size...


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.