TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- check this guy out

check this guy out

Someone I know, MSN log, check out the conversation...

*earlier, I offered him a link to the Ferry set, but he declined, saying his friends are around, and that...
_____________________________________________________________________

[AXIS] J�ger - yeah
[AXIS] J�ger - so they don;t like techno

Turbonium - trance u mean
Turbonium - well then shoot them

[AXIS] J�ger - tracne is techno

Turbonium - not really
Turbonium - techno and trance are both electronica
Turbonium - but trance is not techno

[AXIS] J�ger - electronica is just a newer name for techno
[AXIS] J�ger - and techno is a sub category of techno

Turbonium - u mean trance
Turbonium - but i still don't agree
Turbonium - i could post ur opinion on the boards and see what other tranceheads think

[AXIS] J�ger - no trance is too
[AXIS] J�ger - but techno is one category under techno

Turbonium - ok then
Turbonium - whatever u say
Turbonium - but don't go calling trance techno, cuz it's not even similar

[AXIS] J�ger - haha
[AXIS] J�ger - it is not
[AXIS] J�ger - well a little
[AXIS] J�ger - but not very simialr

Turbonium - no, not at all
Turbonium - holy shit, unless the "trance" u listen to is total cheese
Turbonium - not similar at all
_____________________________________________________________________



I especially like the part where he says "techno is a sub category of techno"...

lol, some people just don't understand. Trance is way different than techno.

Doesn't matter, you can't blame him...

When i first ever heard electronica i kept calling it Techno for over 3 months until i realised what it was...

i called everything techno from commercial to trance...and didn't know the difference...let the newbies ear develop.

well... trance does come from techno, and techno from house...

but nowadays, techno and trance are two different things, and people forget their history lessons

I get into that argument with a friend of mine in Ohio all the time. Eventually, I started yelling at him b/c I had gotten annoyed (eight months of getting it wrong was enough) and he finally corrected himself.

I know what you guys are saying, but here's the thing. This guy has been exposed to trance for some time. He has a polish friend who's into it, as well as me. He just surprised me with his comments.

Where are all these Polish people? I search, and find none. :/ grrr

you know, i found out that when you try to educate people about this you end up looking like an arrogant smartass... cuz in the end you're like tearing your hair out: "no, it's NOT techno, you buttmunch" and yet they still don't understand and don't really care.


so i say one person more, one person less, who gives a shit?

quote:

Originally posted by anuneventrade Where are all these Polish people? I search, and find none. :/ grrr

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=52867

Here you go

quote:

Originally posted by DjDeComp http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...&threadid=52867 Here you go

*hugs* thanks!

Interesting thread, people. I was wondering; I am no expert on music genres, but I know what I like. Obviously Paul van Dyk, Ti�sto, Armin, etc, those guys are trance. I go a specific website to get tracklists when I can't find it here in TA. The artists/groups are all sorted according to genre. How accurate is it, would you guys say? Example: Underworld is classified as Techno. Is that right? Here's the link to the tracklist site: http://members1.chello.nl/~m.c.j.m.lieshout/tl/tl.html

Naw, Underworld isn't techno. I'd classify Underworld as progressive.

quote:

Originally posted by Endlesswave Naw, Underworld isn't techno. I'd classify Underworld as progressive.

Well, dude...Whatever genre Underworld is, be it techno or progressive, I dig their live shows Their albums, the ones with "Days off", they sounded....umm....weird....maybe I had to be wasted to understand the music or something.

Underworld have quite an unique style. I'd qualify them as trance though.

Looks like the disease of ignorance has a good progress in this dude...

quote:

Originally posted by paranoik0 Underworld have quite an unique style. I'd qualify them as trance though.

Interesting analysis dude. Makes me really wonder.

actually "electronica" is a style of electronic music similar to "leftfield". leftfield being the style not the producers. electronica falls under the ambient category. there are five main styles of electronic music. house (from chicago), trance (from britain/europe), techno (from detroit), breaks (no idea where it's from), and ambient (again, no clue as to it's origins). cheers.

quote:

Originally posted by VIO actually "electronica" is a style of electronic music similar to "leftfield". leftfield being the style not the producers. electronica falls under the ambient category. there are five main styles of electronic music. house (from chicago), trance (from britain/europe), techno (from detroit), breaks (no idea where it's from), and ambient (again, no clue as to it's origins). cheers.

Tell me something: house is in no way similar to trance soundwise, is it?

quote:

Originally posted by VIO actually "electronica" is a style of electronic music similar to "leftfield". leftfield being the style not the producers. electronica falls under the ambient category. there are five main styles of electronic music. house (from chicago), trance (from britain/europe), techno (from detroit), breaks (no idea where it's from), and ambient (again, no clue as to it's origins). cheers.

Wicked, but I was close, right? You know that one link to the "history of techno" site or whatever? With the black guys being interviewed and stuff, from Chicago and Detroit. Anyone have the site URL? I lost it.

You know what i hate is everone around hear when they hear any kind of electronic music they consider it techno...n00bs

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.