TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- New project and new melodic trance track "Sleepwalker"
New project and new melodic trance track "Sleepwalker"
Hi!
This is new to some of you. I already posted this to trance.nu
So this new track "Sleepwalker" is my and my friends new production, sorry it is only at 128kbps. I think thats still a good quality 
http://artists.mp3s.com/artist_song/3390/3390574.html
please post your comments 
Man, I love the breakdown @ 2 minutes and on. That lead you use is so eary. Reminds me of hard trance back in like '99. At 3:20, you pull it out of a 3/4 and straight into a 4/4. Sounds a bit off when you do that.
Maybe when you come out of the breakdown, start to build the lead as well as percussion, becasue the melody just goes for a bit too long when it gets to this point.
Also, maybe have a bit more of an ending. From a dj's point of view, that could be annoying to mix the way it just stops like that.
Also, the kick is a tad weak, but I'm use to big ass kicks, so maybe its just me.
Keep it up mate. I would go over it though before you start sending it out.
The composition is very nice, but the track lacks power over-all. The synths sound somewhat.. old or cheap - like you used all soft synths (as good as they're getting, they are still no match for hardware synths) I like the break beats in 3:00 but when it changes back to 4/4 it sounds a little odd (agreeing with cheggy) I like that TB-303 though - sounds very nice..
Am I going to add this track to my playlist? Why or Why not? Yes I am - but only a remaster that I did of it which you can if you like.. sounds much better I believe
download here Again, only beef I have it the 4/4 transition at 3:17 but in a way it sounds cool.. so I'm not really sure
great job none-the-less!
Good toon. Could use some more bass. I liked the transition at 3:17. I say leave it how it is.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by hey cheggy Man, I love the breakdown @ 2 minutes and on. That lead you use is so eary. Reminds me of hard trance back in like '99. At 3:20, you pull it out of a 3/4 and straight into a 4/4. Sounds a bit off when you do that. Maybe when you come out of the breakdown, start to build the lead as well as percussion, becasue the melody just goes for a bit too long when it gets to this point. Also, maybe have a bit more of an ending. From a dj's point of view, that could be annoying to mix the way it just stops like that. Also, the kick is a tad weak, but I'm use to big ass kicks, so maybe its just me. Keep it up mate. I would go over it though before you start sending it out. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo The composition is very nice, but the track lacks power over-all. The synths sound somewhat.. old or cheap - like you used all soft synths (as good as they're getting, they are still no match for hardware synths) I like the break beats in 3:00 but when it changes back to 4/4 it sounds a little odd (agreeing with cheggy) I like that TB-303 though - sounds very nice.. Am I going to add this track to my playlist? Why or Why not? Yes I am - but only a remaster that I did of it which you can if you like.. sounds much better I believe download here Again, only beef I have it the 4/4 transition at 3:17 but in a way it sounds cool.. so I'm not really sure great job none-the-less! |
You should ask first if you are doing anything with anyones music, this is no kindergarten

The server has been having some problems.. try again later...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo The server has been having some problems.. try again later... |
thanks, your tweaked version has more punch. Did you use compression or eq ?
Both actually - I do most of my mastering in the mixing/producing stage.. that's where I adjust all the levels, add Fx, Eq, etc etc... after my mix is done I use a paragraphic eq to cut all frequencies above 17,000hz (adds clarity to the higher notes - allows them to breath more since you can't really hear above 17,000hz) then I use a limiter to ruduce the short high peaks in the track... the Db level I use in the limiter varies depending on the track.. then with all peaks reduced to say 4Db (I think I used 6db when I did yours) I use a compressor or normalizer to maxamize the levels... this is all done in Sonic Foundry: Sound Forge.. (It's owned by sony now) but I highly recommend their software..
A thing about the title, maybe you wanne change it, a Milk Inc nr1 hit was called Sleepwalker, it was top 5 in belgium, dunno about holland and other countries near us, but they pretty popular all around here.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by alanzo Both actually - I do most of my mastering in the mixing/producing stage.. that's where I adjust all the levels, add Fx, Eq, etc etc... after my mix is done I use a paragraphic eq to cut all frequencies above 17,000hz (adds clarity to the higher notes - allows them to breath more since you can't really hear above 17,000hz) then I use a limiter to ruduce the short high peaks in the track... the Db level I use in the limiter varies depending on the track.. then with all peaks reduced to say 4Db (I think I used 6db when I did yours) I use a compressor or normalizer to maxamize the levels... this is all done in Sonic Foundry: Sound Forge.. (It's owned by sony now) but I highly recommend their software.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by BelgianGuru A thing about the title, maybe you wanne change it, a Milk Inc nr1 hit was called Sleepwalker, it was top 5 in belgium, dunno about holland and other countries near us, but they pretty popular all around here. |

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.