Dodge Tomahawk OMG - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Humour / Funny Stuff / Cool Web Sites
-- Dodge Tomahawk OMG

Posted by arj1o1 on Dec-10-2003 15:50:

Dodge Tomahawk OMG

http://www.dodge.com/tomahawk/flash.html

Posted by Mikado on Dec-10-2003 15:54:

Posted by swantonbomb45 on Dec-10-2003 16:30:

what the...

Posted by DJPG on Dec-10-2003 16:44:

That looks like one of the Extreme G bikes (N64).

Posted by MiB on Dec-10-2003 21:56:

saw that bike from a dodge show .. cool shit.. so much horsepower.. =)

Posted by Lumps on Dec-10-2003 22:56:

One word - Madness.

I hear they can't classify it as a bike because it has 4 wheels.

Pull up to all those 'biker boyz' on that piece...

Posted by Arg on Dec-10-2003 23:07:

HAHA the 0-60 time is estimated cuz they cant get enough traction to take off at full speed...I wanna see someone do over 300mph on a bike...rip the guy off before he gets going :P

Posted by kypez on Dec-10-2003 23:54:

That thing is ridiculous.. V10 500hp horspower on a car is amazing but on a motorcycle

Posted by kypez on Dec-10-2003 23:54:

That thing is ridiculous.. V10 500hp horspower on a car is amazing but on a motorcycle

Posted by HyPeRSoNiC on Dec-11-2003 00:04:

in 1 word:
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

in 2 words:
HOLY CRAP!!!

in 3 words:
I'd hit it!

Posted by teegee on Dec-11-2003 02:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Arg
HAHA the 0-60 time is estimated cuz they cant get enough traction to take off at full speed...I wanna see someone do over 300mph on a bike...rip the guy off before he gets going :P

as is the top speed...nobody's willing to be the one to test it so they have to estimate the top speed solely based on power and weight. imagine going 300 on THAT?!

Posted by SuperFarStucker on Dec-11-2003 02:27:

If it's due to traction slippage then it doesn't matter what the theoretical launch 0-60 time is because it will never be attained. Most cars calculate in traction slippage at optimal launch speed (which is actually no traction slip at all) as part of the 0 - 60 time. I'm sure it would be insane getting to even 200 mph on that...

nitromethane powered top fuel's are still more impressive

you could be driving that tomahawk at an honest ~200 mph (which would take a lot of distance to achieve) when you suddenly pass a top fuel dragster at the line. Lets just assume he launches the exact moment you pass him. You'd be ahead until about an 1/8th of a mile later when the top fuel would blow by you (you, still travelling @ 200 mph) to finish the quarter mile at 330+ mph. thats fucking acceleration, 8g's on launch. Be very afraid...

Posted by SuperFarStucker on Dec-11-2003 02:30:

quote:
Originally posted by SuperFarStucker
If it's due to traction slippage then it doesn't matter what the theoretical launch 0-60 time is because it will never be attained. Most cars calculate in traction slippage at optimal launch speed (which is actually no traction slip at all) as part of the 0 - 60 time. I'm sure it would be insane getting to even 200 mph on that...

nitromethane powered top fuel's are still more impressive

you could be driving that tomahawk at an honest ~200 mph (which would take a lot of distance to achieve) when you suddenly pass a top fuel dragster at the line. Lets just assume he launches the exact moment you pass him. You'd be ahead until about an 1/8th of a mile later when the top fuel would blow by you (you, still travelling @ 200 mph) to finish the quarter mile at 330+ mph. thats fucking acceleration, 8g's on launch. Be very afraid...

just to make that clear, i mean it will never be achieved on those tires =), you could always put on some thicker or grippier tread but that is a modification so they couldn't list the stock 0-60 time as that. Of course they will never sell these so i guess thats a null point

Posted by Arg on Dec-11-2003 02:53:

And then the shuttle passes you...

The thing is its actually a car with no roof. It does have 4 wheels. So I dont see wat is so amazing about it...

Posted by whiskers on Dec-11-2003 03:56:

i'll stick to a 1954 VW bug, thank you very much!

Posted by arj1o1 on Dec-11-2003 07:41:

quote:
Originally posted by whiskers
i'll stick to a 1954 VW bug, thank you very much!

muhahaha with a big v8 in it

Posted by Arg on Dec-11-2003 08:17:

quote:
Originally posted by arj1o1
muhahaha with a big v8 in it

NO MAN! its a vw ...it has to be a W8...

Posted by quilly on Dec-11-2003 13:15:

Phat

Posted by TrancE OasiS on Dec-11-2003 13:30:

Dang! That is one hell of a bike!

Posted by pornodoll on Dec-12-2003 21:07:

My goodness!

Posted by N|te-L|fe on Dec-13-2003 06:45:

Holy Schmock!!! the futur is there

Posted by arj1o1 on Dec-13-2003 08:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Arg
NO MAN! its a vw ...it has to be a W8...