Battlefield or Call of Duty - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Gaming Forum
-- Battlefield or Call of Duty

Posted by djSlain on Feb-18-2004 22:43:

Battlefield or Call of Duty

war?

Battlfield is pretty fun, especially DC. However, it runs very poorly on my system with the GeForce 4 MX 440. It's fun, but my experience might be ruined with the performance. i love multiplayer btw.
Call of Duty is INTENSE, as a single player game. I haven't heard anything about multiplayer and i hear it's short. it also runs very smoothly on my comp. might be a great gaming experience.

i don't think i should wait for BF:Vietnam 'cus i think it would run like shit on this system

Posted by Matt Jay on Feb-18-2004 23:02:

Re: Battlefield or Call of Duty

quote:
Originally posted by djSlain
war?

Battlfield is pretty fun, especially DC. However, it runs very poorly on my system with the GeForce 4 MX 440. It's fun, but my experience might be ruined with the performance. i love multiplayer btw.
Call of Duty is INTENSE, as a single player game. I haven't heard anything about multiplayer and i hear it's short. it also runs very smoothly on my comp. might be a great gaming experience.

i don't think i should wait for BF:Vietnam 'cus i think it would run like shit on this system

Theres nothing like playing CoD on server with 40 other ppl in Team Deathmatch.

It's quite hard to camp as someone will always kill you from behind :P

Single player is short but very intense.

Posted by ThaDevil on Feb-19-2004 00:04:

Battlefield 1942 is not in the same league as Call Of Duty.

Posted by rizo on Feb-19-2004 09:38:

BF1942 atm for me

Posted by lyte on Feb-19-2004 19:58:

I say CoD MP for sure!

Posted by Synchronized on Feb-21-2004 01:55:

tough choice but COD gets my vote

Posted by ga11agher on Feb-21-2004 03:13:

call of duty - hands down

Posted by nrjizer on Feb-21-2004 08:34:

CoD > regular BF

however EoD > CoD imo, because the maps are so large and well done, its a lot of fun sneaking through the bushes and popping someone off.

Posted by TeKnoHe@d2025 on Feb-21-2004 14:10:

BF doesn't run well on your PC but CoD does...I find that odd. They both run fine here, but CoD is definitely the more graphic intensive of the two.

Posted by nrjizer on Feb-21-2004 22:32:

quote:
Originally posted by TeKnoHe@d2025
BF doesn't run well on your PC but CoD does...I find that odd. They both run fine here, but CoD is definitely the more graphic intensive of the two.

Becuase CoD is Quake3 Engine, and Carmack can program anything

Posted by alanzo on Feb-25-2004 05:49:

Call of Duty is lots of fun but is to damn short.. I beat the game in a day.. it took all day, but it was still a day

Posted by MoonMan on Mar-01-2004 14:28:

Desert Combat gets my vote, just seeing newbies jump in to helis cracks me up

Posted by ViolentNature on Mar-01-2004 14:48:

Call of Duty, hands down.

I'm a former BF1942 player and cs.. BF1942 takes too much time compared to CoD, even though it has vehicles the formula for popular gaming is fast-pased games, like cs. Which CoD is in all of its multiplayer and single player forms.

Single Player for CoD is supremely better then bf1942, some of the missions are well directed and alot of uniqueness to the missions as well. Especially all the battles that you see in movies, plus the real life it portrays.

TDM, SD, R, all the multi-player modes are fun in CoD.

Posted by PVDrules on Mar-04-2004 00:39:

I think all of you have god mad... BF- DC is a million times better then COD.. the multiplayer for COD is ok at best.. it doesnt even come close to comparing to BF... I think all of you should get your heads examined :P... but if you like single player games then obviously COD is better lol!

Posted by ThaDevil on Mar-04-2004 02:19:

BF1942 is pure crap, crappy engine, crappy performance and not half intense as COD, which has also superior graphics and performance.

Posted by Joost on Mar-05-2004 17:33:

Call of Duty!! I used to play it alot, also played for a clan (www.sgaclan.tk), but i quit playing it since that fucking 1.2 patch came along (no more bunnyhopping and fucked up sniper scope )...

Posted by DJ_Quartz on Mar-11-2004 06:44:

Both are really awesome games i reckon but for me BF1942 is good for having fun and call of doody is good for some serious game play