TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Guide to Harmonic Mixing
Guide to Harmonic Mixing
Guide to Harmonic Mixing
Had to make a new thread because I couldn't edit the old one. Current version is 1.02.
The link is now static, and can update without the help of this post.
old thread:
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=152207
First off, DJ Nuclear, let me say i admire your work and your dedication towards us. Thank you very much.
I have a practical question. After reading v1.02 three or four times extensively, i came to realize that maybe the scale correlation isn't necessary for transitions between minors? Let me explain.
According to your minor scale correlations, mixing into a dominant or sub-dominant provides a harmonic connection between 6 of the 7 keys in the target scale. So this is the ultimate harmonic transition, provided that you ignore transitions between the same scale and other than minor to minor.
Taking a look at the scale tables, the other two possible harmonic connections are between the second and the seventh. By taking a look at the easymix wheel, you can see that what that means is that there is a possible harmonic transitions between the root key and two to the right and to the left.
However, testing this in real world, i find that the difference between 6/7 and 5/7 is enourmous. It's still a harmonic mix, but completely different. I can now understand why some of my experiences apparently off key sound right - i was mixing in the second or seventh.
So, what i want to ask you is this: Do you think that for minor to minor transitions, in a practical situation, it isn't better to ignore any other than mixing into a dominant or sub-dominant?
Because mixing into a second or seventh requires a previous attempt to hear if the tracks are really compatible, and for me one of the most important goals of harmonic mixing is really not having to test records live before playing them, as this takes up too much time.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by borron First off, DJ Nuclear, let me say i admire your work and your dedication towards us. Thank you very much. I have a practical question. After reading v1.02 three or four times extensively, i came to realize that maybe the scale correlation isn't necessary for transitions between minors? Let me explain. According to your minor scale correlations, mixing into a dominant or sub-dominant provides a harmonic connection between 6 of the 7 keys in the target scale. So this is the ultimate harmonic transition, provided that you ignore transitions between the same scale and other than minor to minor. Taking a look at the scale tables, the other two possible harmonic connections are between the second and the seventh. By taking a look at the easymix wheel, you can see that what that means is that there is a possible harmonic transitions between the root key and two to the right and to the left. However, testing this in real world, i find that the difference between 6/7 and 5/7 is enourmous. It's still a harmonic mix, but completely different. I can now understand why some of my experiences apparently off key sound right - i was mixing in the second or seventh. So, what i want to ask you is this: Do you think that for minor to minor transitions, in a practical situation, it isn't better to ignore any other than mixing into a dominant or sub-dominant? Because mixing into a second or seventh requires a previous attempt to hear if the tracks are really compatible, and for me one of the most important goals of harmonic mixing is really not having to test records live before playing them, as this takes up too much time. |
Ok thanks for everything! I guess sometimes rules can be broken, as long as we have the ability and luck to do it properly.
I have another question.
What are the relations between majors and minors? I play house music and over time i'm finding out that house has lots of majors (although the large majority is still minor).
In the other thread i asked you if i could treat an A major as an A minor, to which Nem answered that i could get away with that.
So let's suppose i have a track in G major. The corresponding minor is Em, and it's dominant and sub-dominant are Bm and Am. But the G minor dominant and sub-dominant are Cm and Dm.
So does this mean i can mix a track in G major into a track which is either Bm, Am, Cm and Dm? But the mix sounds best if i mix it with the Em dominants right?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by borron I have another question. What are the relations between majors and minors? I play house music and over time i'm finding out that house has lots of majors (although the large majority is still minor). In the other thread i asked you if i could treat an A major as an A minor, to which Nem answered that i could get away with that. So let's suppose i have a track in G major. The corresponding minor is Em, and it's dominant and sub-dominant are Bm and Am. But the G minor dominant and sub-dominant are Cm and Dm. So does this mean i can mix a track in G major into a track which is either Bm, Am, Cm and Dm? But the mix sounds best if i mix it with the Em dominants right? |
Thanks!
So, to finish it, in order to simplify the "keying" process, i can label all the majors as their corresponding minors (G to Em, for example), and ignore the majors altogether? Do you think this is a good idea?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by borron Thanks! So, to finish it, in order to simplify the "keying" process, i can label all the majors as their corresponding minors (G to Em, for example), and ignore the majors altogether? Do you think this is a good idea? |
harmonic mixing doesnt apply to progressive style right? I only notice it with uplifting trance. Anyways, thats a cool stuff! 
AM I the only one who can't link to the guide?
Nah, doesnt work for me either.
Doh, was looking forward to reading this
if anyone has it could they drop a PM so they could possibly email me it
thanks 
same problem... bad link
i hve a problem understandig compatible keys... maybe its just my english but could someone tell me the basics? like Am goes with bm gm and A#m. simply so i can understand... ive tried alot of sites but i dont get it, so please help
thanx,jason
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dmatrox harmonic mixing doesnt apply to progressive style right? I only notice it with uplifting trance. Anyways, thats a cool stuff! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dmatrox harmonic mixing doesnt apply to progressive style right? I only notice it with uplifting trance. Anyways, thats a cool stuff! |
guide seems to be down
Im not too sure but if you start a set in one key, do you mean that.... for it to sound good, you need to stay in that key the entire night? Is there any way you can switch keys without it sounding like crap?
Cheers
| quote: |
| Originally posted by FSUares Im not too sure but if you start a set in one key, do you mean that.... for it to sound good, you need to stay in that key the entire night? Is there any way you can switch keys without it sounding like crap? Cheers |
damnnnnn i really wana read this!! PLEASE fix the link!
hey! thanks for that guide been in need of such a thing ever since i got my beatmatching down 
many thanks 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.