City 4 United 1 - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Sports Discussion
-- City 4 United 1

Posted by Ian on Mar-14-2004 16:03:

City 4 United 1

Man City 4 - 1 Man Utd FT
Fowler 3
Macken 32
Sinclair 73
Wright-Phillips 90 (HT: 2-1) Scholes 35

That would be all

Posted by dukes on Mar-14-2004 16:07:

Re: City 4 United 1

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
Man City 4 - 1 Man Utd FT
Fowler 3
Macken 32
Sinclair 73
Wright-Phillips 90 (HT: 2-1) Scholes 35

That would be all

THAT WOULD BE ALL?!?!?!?!?

come on GLOAT WITH ME!!!

muhhahahahahh!

im such a huge ABU fan!!!!

Posted by Genesis Evolved on Mar-14-2004 16:23:

What a bad bad week for Man United

Kidderminster forever!

Posted by Plastick on Mar-14-2004 16:48:

horrible week for MU. Very sad... im lost.

Posted by torontotrance on Mar-14-2004 17:50:

still better than bolton

that is all...stfu

8 championships in 11 years

how many does bolton have ian?

nuff said end of story.

Posted by DJ-Fuq on Mar-14-2004 18:28:

Fuck fuck fuck. We have been so unlucky in different ways this season. All the injuries/suspensions/bad decisions etc have hit us hard. If we had our first team on all this season we wouldnt be in this position.

Posted by chesco on Mar-14-2004 18:44:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ-Fuq
Fuck fuck fuck. We have been so unlucky in different ways this season. All the injuries/suspensions/bad decisions etc have hit us hard. If we had our first team on all this season we wouldnt be in this position.

aye right.

4-1 against city is a disgrace. I can see walter smith is working his magic already..

Posted by Ian on Mar-14-2004 18:45:

quote:
Originally posted by torontotrance
still better than bolton

that is all...stfu

8 championships in 11 years

how many does bolton have ian?

nuff said end of story.

stop deflecting it Andy

Man United spent 3 times more on Ronaldo than our entire squad cost, therefore reaching a cup final, and being in the premiership for a 4th season in a row is just as successful, probably more so, and it's more fun being a bolton fan, there's highs, lows, more lows, but it's unpredictable, unlike being a united fan when they cry if they don't win, because they expect to.

Face it, Fergie should've gone, not Beckham

Posted by TiestoFanMatt on Mar-14-2004 19:46:

The start of Manchester United's decline Well wouldn't really say that, but i think from now on, Chelski and Arsenal will dominate the league.

Didn't watch the game, but i heard fergie didnt buy a defender in Jan because they would all be ellegible for the Champions League, nice to know where his priorities lay!!

Anyway, good old Man city, they've been playing well but been having no luck what so ever!

WHo said man u had allot of injuries? bad decisions? bad refs? THis is something all managers complain about, and as the riches club in the world FACT they should deal with it

I would support my beloved Derby over Utd any day

Posted by willsimo on Mar-14-2004 20:09:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ-Fuq
Fuck fuck fuck. We have been so unlucky in different ways this season. All the injuries/suspensions/bad decisions etc have hit us hard. If we had our first team on all this season we wouldnt be in this position.

As an United fan I would like to agree, but that is mostly bollocks. United have not been good enough, plain and simple.

Posted by raveed on Mar-14-2004 20:21:

quote:
Originally posted by willsimo
As an United fan I would like to agree, but that is mostly bollocks. United have not been good enough, plain and simple.

have to agree with you there ... but in all fairness, united has got the raw end of the stick this year with the ban on ferdinand , the departure of kenyon who in turn fucked united over with the ronaldinho transfer ... and for all those who think united being the richest club up in the world makes them have bottomless pockets remember that we are a publicly listed company which automatically limits our spending power as compared to chelsea or real madrid ...

hey does anyone know whats up with Saha not being included in the first team lately , im quite sure hes not injured so did he have a bust up with fergie or something???

Posted by TiestoFanMatt on Mar-14-2004 21:31:

quote:
Originally posted by raveed
have to agree with you there ... but in all fairness, united has got the raw end of the stick this year with the ban on ferdinand , the departure of kenyon who in turn fucked united over with the ronaldinho transfer ... and for all those who think united being the richest club up in the world makes them have bottomless pockets remember that we are a publicly listed company which automatically limits our spending power as compared to chelsea or real madrid ...

hey does anyone know whats up with Saha not being included in the first team lately , im quite sure hes not injured so did he have a bust up with fergie or something???

If Fergie would have asked money for a defender during Jan the the board would have accepted his request and backed him.

Ronaldinho?? He moved to Barca ages ago i thought?

Posted by Xavier on Mar-14-2004 22:55:

this Manc derby reminds me of City's 5-1 hammering over manure in Sept 1989 at Maine Road it prompted the signs of "Fergie out" at Old trafford, until he fluked the FA cup that season.

hmm could yesterday's result prove Fergie's exit this time around?

Posted by razmataz on Mar-14-2004 23:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Xavier
this Manc derby reminds me of City's 5-1 hammering over manure in Sept 1989 at Maine Road it prompted the signs of "Fergie out" at Old trafford, until he fluked the FA cup that season.

I would think his results for as long as I can remember, indicate that he was on the verge of something big at the time and that perhaps that City loss was "fluked".

Posted by A.J. on Mar-15-2004 04:21:

A surprising result.

Man City have had Manchester United's number for the last couple of derbys.....

Good to see!

Posted by hardstyle on Mar-16-2004 21:38:

And why Solksjaer not in the srating line up?????

Posted by willsimo on Mar-16-2004 22:36:

Re: eh

quote:
Originally posted by hardstyle
And why Solksjaer not in the srating line up?????

Because he has only just recovered from a fairly long-term injury?

Posted by projektion- on Mar-17-2004 17:05:

It's nice to be humbled once in a while.

Posted by raveed on Mar-23-2004 05:38:

Re: Re: eh

quote:
Originally posted by willsimo
Because he has only just recovered from a fairly long-term injury?

and why is Saha not in the starting lineup ???

serious .. its something ive been trying to find out cuz he had been getting us the goals and now all of a sudden hes not starting ne games ...