England vs Windies - A Hero is Born

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Sports Discussion
-- England vs Windies - A Hero is Born

Posted by Ian on Mar-14-2004 23:58:

England vs Windies - A Hero is Born

Toss: West Indies
Umpires: BF Bowden (NZ) and DJ Harper (Aus)
TV Umpire: EA Nicholls
Match Referee: MJ Procter (SA)
Man of the Match: SJ Harmison

Close of Play:

Day 1: West Indies 311/9 (Collymore 3*, Edwards 1*; 84.4 overs)
Day 2: West Indies 311, England 154/3 (Hussain 41*, Thorpe 1*; 48.1 overs)
Day 3: England 339, West Indies 8/0 (Gayle 8*, Smith 0*; 3 overs)
West Indies 1st innings R M B 4 6
CH Gayle b Harmison 5 22 15 1 0
DS Smith st Read b Giles 108 275 188 18 0
RR Sarwan lbw b Hoggard 0 15 11 0 0
*BC Lara c Flintoff b Jones 23 66 42 4 0
S Chanderpaul b Hoggard 7 54 37 1 0
RO Hinds c Butcher b Giles 84 167 117 12 0
+RD Jacobs c Vaughan b Jones 38 66 45 3 0
TL Best lbw b Harmison 20 54 29 1 1
A Sanford c Trescothick b Flintoff 1 21 17 0 0
CD Collymore not out 3 35 21 0 0
FH Edwards c Flintoff b Hoggard 1 17 12 0 0
Extras (lb 6, w 1, nb 14) 21
Total (all out, 86.4 overs, 403 mins) 311

FoW: 1-17 (Gayle, 5.3 ov), 2-22 (Sarwan, 8.5 ov),
3-73 (Lara, 22.1 ov), 4-101 (Chanderpaul, 34.3 ov),
5-223 (Smith, 59.5 ov), 6-281 (Hinds, 71.5 ov),
7-289 (Jacobs, 74.5 ov), 8-300 (Sanford, 79.5 ov),
9-307 (Best, 83.3 ov), 10-311 (Edwards, 86.4 ov).

Bowling O M R W
Hoggard 18.4 3 68 3 (3nb)
Harmison 21 6 61 2 (4nb, 1w)
Flintoff 16 3 45 1 (6nb)
Jones 18 2 62 2
Giles 12 0 67 2
Vaughan 1 0 2 0 (1nb)

England 1st innings R M B 4 6
ME Trescothick b Edwards 7 32 21 1 0
*MP Vaughan c Lara b Edwards 15 43 28 3 0
MA Butcher c Jacobs b Edwards 58 197 139 6 0
N Hussain c sub (DE Bernard) b Best 58 278 158 7 0
GP Thorpe c Sanford b Best 19 66 39 3 0
A Flintoff c Hinds b Sarwan 46 69 50 5 0
+CMW Read c Hinds b Best 20 73 46 2 0
AF Giles b Sanford 27 81 61 4 0
MJ Hoggard not out 9 94 71 0 0
SP Jones c Sanford b Hinds 7 19 13 1 0
SJ Harmison run out (sub [RL Powell]/Hinds) 13 14 12 1 0
Extras (b 7, lb 28, w 7, nb 18) 60
Total (all out, 103.2 overs) 339

FoW: 1-28 (Trescothick, 7.2 ov), 2-33 (Vaughan, 9.2 ov),
3-152 (Butcher, 47.3 ov), 4-194 (Thorpe, 59.2 ov),
5-209 (Hussain, 63.2 ov), 6-268 (Flintoff, 74.4 ov),
7-278 (Read, 81.1 ov), 8-313 (Giles, 94.4 ov),
9-325 (Jones, 99.3 ov), 10-339 (Harmison, 103.2 ov).

Bowling O M R W
Collymore 26 7 55 0 (9nb)
Edwards 19.3 3 72 3 (7nb, 2w)
Best 19 1 57 3 (1nb, 4w)
Sanford 22 1 90 1 (1nb, 1w)
Hinds 11.5 2 18 1
Gayle 1 0 6 0
Sarwan 4 1 6 1

West Indies 2nd innings R M B 4 6
CH Gayle c Thorpe b Harmison 9 32 25 1 0
DS Smith c & b Hoggard 12 65 42 2 0
RR Sarwan lbw b Harmison 0 7 8 0 0
S Chanderpaul b Harmison 0 7 7 0 0
*BC Lara c Flintoff b Hoggard 0 4 5 0 0
RO Hinds c Read b Jones 3 45 23 0 0
+RD Jacobs c Hussain b Harmison 15 29 22 3 0
TL Best c Read b Harmison 0 1 2 0 0
A Sanford c Trescothick b Harmison 1 9 8 0 0
CD Collymore not out 2 12 5 0 0
FH Edwards c Trescothick b Harmison 0 6 7 0 0
Extras (lb 4, nb 1) 5
Total (all out, 25.3 overs, 118 mins) 47

FoW: 1-13 (Gayle, 7.4 ov), 2-13 (Sarwan, 9.6 ov),
3-15 (Chanderpaul, 11.5 ov), 4-16 (Lara, 12.6 ov),
5-21 (Smith, 14.3 ov), 6-41 (Jacobs, 21.3 ov),
7-41 (Best, 21.5 ov), 8-43 (Hinds, 22.4 ov),
9-43 (Sanford, 23.5 ov), 10-47 (Edwards, 25.3 ov).

Bowling O M R W
Hoggard 9 2 21 2
Harmison 12.3 8 12 7
Jones 4 1 10 1 (1nb)

England 2nd innings (target: 20 runs) R M B 4 6
ME Trescothick not out 6 11 8 1 0
*MP Vaughan not out 11 11 9 1 1
Extras (b 1, nb 2) 3
Total (0 wickets, 2.3 overs, 11 mins) 20

Fucking Ave It Harmison

Posted by RubiK Cube on Mar-15-2004 00:17:

Looks very promising and makes the rest of the tests exciting

But how many times have we seen England play briliantly and then proceed to disintigrate in the rest of the series

Posted by Xavier on Mar-15-2004 00:39:

Ian^ ooof 7 wickets for how many runs? 12 or 8? sorry I cant read it properly.

Posted by raveed on Mar-15-2004 01:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Xavier
Ian^ ooof 7 wickets for how many runs? 12 or 8? sorry I cant read it properly.

12

Posted by Ian on Mar-15-2004 02:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Xavier
Ian^ ooof 7 wickets for how many runs? 12 or 8? sorry I cant read it properly.

7 for 12 mate

was fucking outstanding, really can't believe I saw it happen, felt like pinching myself throughout

Posted by A.J. on Mar-15-2004 04:19:

He's got nothing on Shane Warne.

500 Test wickets!!!!

Posted by Ian on Mar-17-2004 11:31:

Warne is a legend though, guys like Harmison are starting out and may in 10 years time end up being considered as one amongst, probably not, but they won't know