BT- Emotional Technology - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- BT- Emotional Technology

Posted by Kris-DigitX on Mar-20-2004 09:59:

BT- Emotional Technology

Hey,

Did anyone listen to this track
BT- Emotional Technology........

Nice .. try it

regards,
Krishna

Posted by MekkaFIN on Mar-20-2004 10:42:

Do you mean teh CD? :P
It's ok.

Posted by vmc on Mar-20-2004 13:14:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=119045

Posted by T-1000 on Mar-20-2004 18:56:

It Blows, dude.

Posted by hooknife on Mar-20-2004 19:56:

quote:
Originally posted by T-1000
It Blows, dude.

Looks like someone has bad taste in music.....I feel sorry for you.

Posted by ++ EGO ++ on Mar-20-2004 20:07:

quote:
Originally posted by hooknife
Looks like someone has bad taste in music.....I feel sorry for you.

hehe, I agree

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-20-2004 20:13:

quote:
Originally posted by hooknife
Looks like someone has bad taste in music.....I feel sorry for you.

While I wouldn't go as far as saying it blows I have to say it is the poorest BT album to date. Waaay overproduced.

Posted by Slag on Mar-20-2004 20:17:

BT Rocks

Posted by hooknife on Mar-20-2004 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
While I wouldn't go as far as saying it blows I have to say it is the poorest BT album to date. Waaay overproduced.

This album is very intresting to me, I find that people either love it or hate it.

Posted by T-1000 on Mar-20-2004 20:46:

quote:
Originally posted by hooknife
This album is very intresting to me, I find that people either love it or hate it.

Yes, and I happen to be among the ones hating it. It's bad.

Posted by Denser on Mar-20-2004 20:57:

Search lord Krishna

Posted by Dmatrox on Mar-20-2004 20:57:

i love it. Its well produced, and not cookie cutter music. You can't label it trance either may be thats why people dont like it.

Posted by Dmatrox on Mar-20-2004 20:57:

i love it. Its well produced, and not cookie cutter music. You can't label it trance either may be thats why people dont like it.

Posted by Phunky1 on Mar-20-2004 21:11:

yeah, this definatly isn't a trance album. I find it more like electronica.
But it's a wikkid album none the less, a totally new, fresh style.

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-20-2004 21:21:

quote:
Originally posted by hooknife
This album is very intresting to me, I find that people either love it or hate it.

Heh, I can't really decide to be honest. On one hand I love the tunes but at the same time I feel he went way overboard with the stutters and other effects.

Posted by Clyde77 on Mar-20-2004 22:38:

bt = pop emotions

Posted by jokerinnocence on Mar-22-2004 02:48:

brilliant album of bt again!

Posted by Dojomaster26 on Mar-22-2004 02:55:

I thought it didn't really sound like a BT album. It sounded more like a pop album to me....

The album has it's good points ("Communicate" and "Force Of Gravity"), but there's a ton of filler, making it my least-favorite BT album. I would stick with "Movement In Still Life".

Posted by sly on Mar-22-2004 03:13:

Its highly under rated IMO. Its a very good feeling album for the most part. However, one thing is certain, it does not "blow".

Indeed, it has vocals for all of the tracks but I think they are very well produced. Nothing cheesely. I think BT wanted more a of commericial feel to it as apparent with the vocals (and also the rock tunes, which are very well done). His previous albums in comparison are more trance/electronica. Which is what most people were expecting but ET is good notherless.

I don't know, it would seem that some people consider vocals as being commercial ************ of the quality of the track.

Posted by hooknife on Mar-22-2004 18:33:

quote:
Originally posted by T-1000
Yes, and I happen to be among the ones hating it. It's bad.

Like I said.....I feel sorry for you.

Posted by Torley Wong on Mar-23-2004 01:44:

BT's a genius beyond compare. I have no qualms in saying that.

He realizes there is a certain irony -- maybe it's harder for an underground dance producer to make pop music than a lot of people realize.

And oh, if you didn't like that, check out the Monster score. What I've heard of it so far, anyway, very lush and melodic and low-key at times yet brooding and full of... Emotional Technology? Can I say that ?

Most of the criticism I've seen of BT comes with the territory, and stems from jealousy and insecurity.

I don't know BT personally nor do I claim to, but as a human being, he seems to be a genuinely nice guy. I doubt he would have so many collaborators and friends among the top tiers of musicians (Tiesto, PvD, Hybrid, I know I'm missing a lot of names here) if this wasn't the case.

Posted by Psygnosis on Mar-23-2004 02:46:

To be honest my first impression of this album must have been bad. But some people just got to realise that what BT done in this album is quite unique, i mean if you tell any other electronic producer to make a RnB or Rock song... what do you think it will sound like? Cheese at its best. The way BT made this album show all genres in a professionalism state is just pure genius.

This album is a masterpiece, sure it can't be regarded a trance album but who says you have to be close minded about everything.

I think this can be said about Paul Van Dyks "Reflections", though Paul didn't make a Rock song, he did however cross to different genres other than trance and made it sound good nonetheless.

I wouldn't go as far as saying that it's the worst BT album, it's just different.

Posted by Torley Wong on Mar-23-2004 02:52:

Good points Psygnosis. Yes, if I were to be bluntly honest: WHERE ARE ALL THE INSTRUMENTALS??? Even if I didn't like PvD (isn't Vega a rock band usually?) and BT, I'd have to admit they tried something new, risky, and were exploring the diverse spectrum of music. The crazy thing is ... if you keep doing the same thing, people will blame you. You try something new, people will blame you for that too. Crazy world huh.

But really, BT promises instrumentals on his 5th album. Which I, like all the others, look forward to. Ha ha ha.

Posted by fathomless1 on Mar-23-2004 03:23:

Uuum...It is not usual BT style, I liked it regaurdless, if others dont...okay. everyone has an opinion.

Done.