TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Saudis said to boost oil output


Posted by xKaoSx on Apr-19-2004 17:40:

Saudis said to boost oil output

So whats going to happen- AFTER- if this idiot gets re-elected?

No. 1 oil exporter will reportedly increase production before election in effort to help Bush.
April 19, 2004: 7:09 AM EDT

NEW YORK (CNN) - A top Saudi official has assured President Bush that his country will increase oil production to lower gas prices before November to help the president's re-election prospects, according to a broadcast report Sunday.

Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, discussing his new book on the run-up to the Iraq war on CBS' '60 Minutes,' said Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador to the United States and a long-time friend of the Bush family, has given the pledge that "certainly over the summer, or as we get closer to the election, they could increase production several million barrels a day and the price would drop significantly."

Earlier this month, the Saudi ambassador publicly said his country wants to stabilize world oil prices because of the effect a price spike might have on economies around the world, including Saudi Arabia. He did not link the effort to the U.S. election.

Record-high gas prices have become an issue in the presidential race between Bush and the presumptive Democratic nominee, Sen. John Kerry.

Kerry has criticized Bush for not doing more to bring high prices under control, while the Bush campaign has run ads noting that Kerry once supported a 50-cent per gallon increase in the federal gasoline tax, which would have meant even higher prices.

Amid concerns that plans by OPEC to cut oil production could raise prices even further, Prince Bandar went to the White House April 1 to meet with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and to deliver a message to Bush from Crown Prince Abdullah, the de facto Saudi ruler.

Afterward, he told reporters that Saudi Arabia is committed to heading off any shortages in the world energy market.

"We will not allow shortages in the market because that will hurt the world economy," he said. "Saudi Arabia does not live on the moon. When the world economy gets hurt, we get hurt also."

He also said that the president and the crown prince "have been in touch on this subject for a while now."

"Both leaders feel strongly that higher energy prices have a negative impact on the world economy and on the recovery of the world economy," Prince Bandar said. "We will not allow shortage of the markets of oil in the market to increase the prices."

The ambassador said Saudi Arabia would like to see the price of oil, which now tops $33 a barrel, to be between $22 and $28 a barrel.

OPEC has said it plans to cut production by as much as 1 million barrels per day in April, which would further increase prices. However, Saudi Arabia, as OPEC's most influential member and largest producer, could thwart those plans.


Posted by malek on Apr-19-2004 17:50:

WTF IS THIS!?!!??


This fucking Saudi leadership needs to be hung and dragged into the streets!!!

I'm not bitching because they want to help Bush, but because they're holding back production for no reasons.


Posted by Krypton on Apr-19-2004 19:56:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
WTF IS THIS!?!!??


This fucking Saudi leadership needs to be hung and dragged into the streets!!!

I'm not bitching because they want to help Bush, but because they're holding back production for no reasons.


money, money, and more MONEY

i bet bush is paying them off too


Posted by George Smiley on Apr-19-2004 19:59:

And the best part is...Saudi Arabia are one of the biggest supporters of al-Qaida!!!!


Posted by St_Andrew on Apr-19-2004 21:41:

i for one think it's good with high gas prices


Posted by NeoPhono on Apr-19-2004 22:04:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
i for one think it's good with high gas prices


Historically, and adjusted economically, prices aren't even that high. It's just a bunch of ignorant Americans bitching about something they saw on tv. Stupid media. Stupid Americans.


Posted by imokruok on Apr-20-2004 01:37:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::

i bet bush is paying them off too


Unlikely. While the Saudis take a piss, they earn more interest on their money than Bush is worth.

It's yet another example of Democrats bitching about a problem, and standing in the way of a solution. Kerry gives whole speeches on gas prices - perhaps he should give a speech on why he doesn't support more domestic drilling, i.e. ANWR, and has blocked measures to increase existing domestic production.


Posted by xKaoSx on Apr-20-2004 05:25:

quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono
Historically, and adjusted economically, prices aren't even that high. It's just a bunch of ignorant Americans bitching about something they saw on tv. Stupid media. Stupid Americans.


you fucking idiot-
you must be 15 and dont own a car.
Gas prices here are $2.30/g

You dont think that is high?

WHY would gas in one part of the country be $1.60 and in cali be that much higher?


Posted by occrider on Apr-20-2004 05:33:

quote:
Originally posted by xKaoSx
you fucking idiot-
you must be 15 and dont own a car.
Gas prices here are $2.30/g

You dont think that is high?

WHY would gas in one part of the country be $1.60 and in cali be that much higher?


Because California has implemented new environmental laws that include new additives that burn gasoline better during the summer driving months. Furthermore state legislatures impose various forms of taxes themselves on gasoline to build state revenues. Cali is particularly bad with this.

I thought Californians wanted to help their environment?


Posted by NeoPhono on Apr-20-2004 06:38:

quote:
Originally posted by xKaoSx
you fucking idiot-
you must be 15 and dont own a car.
Gas prices here are $2.30/g

You dont think that is high?

WHY would gas in one part of the country be $1.60 and in cali be that much higher?


I posted an article about this earlier. If you look at inflation and average income in relation to gas prices, they are no where near the record high. Thanks for your mature response.


Posted by Q5echo on Apr-20-2004 07:44:

To signifigantly affect our gas prices now would reqire a very overt increase in production combined with a very overt derease in price per barrel crude. This being done by one orginization that we only recieve 14% of our gross import from. The Sauds being 1/6th of that orginization but with a slight chokehold.(54% of oil used in this country is imported that means a 1/4 of that gross is from OPEC.) This combined with the fact that China, the second largest consumer and soon to become the largest , is competing for the same oil including everyone else they export to would have to increase production and lower their prices thus loosing potential billions to affect our election? Then the entire domestic importing pigs (Shell Exxon/Mobile)would be involved. The guys that really control our end user prices.

seems like a stretch. but its a crazy world.

...and don't the Saudi's do this every election year?

I say blame your state government and the uber rich gas conglomerates for your prices at the pump.

And to say Bush is "paying the Saudi's off" is a pretty reckless statement. Paying them off for what? Who? Why? How?


Posted by Dupz on Apr-20-2004 08:52:

Why are Americans having such a cry over their gas prices???
They've got some of the cheapest petrol in the world. I think it's only Venezuela, and maybe another country or two, who are paying less for petrol.
In Melbourne we're paying the equivalent of about US$2.78 per gallon of petrol.. I mean, we're even kicking up a stink about it here too..
I feel sorry for the British, who pay something around US$5 for the gallon of petrol. Sure they drive much less than we would, but still, get over it.

Refering back to NeoPhono's comment:
quote:
Historically, and adjusted economically, prices aren't even that high. It's just a bunch of ignorant Americans bitching about something they saw on tv. Stupid media. Stupid Americans.

This comment has some truth to it... The reason why petrol is as expensive as it is, is simply because it's heavily taxed (this is because demand for petrol is inelastic, therefore a favourable good for governments to tax). In real terms, the price of petrol has fallen over the last 20 years. Dont believe me? This site should help:
http://www.shell.com.au/petrolpricing/index_vic.html

The fact that the price of petrol, in real terms, has fallen over the last 20 years is quite interesting. In economic terms, the marginal cost of extracting and processing an exhaustable resource becomes more and more expensive over time (simply because there's less and less of it in the ground (ie, it becomes harder to pump it out of the ground etc etc)). We see this, yet we still have cheaper petrol than what we had 20 years ago?? weird

But yeah, we'll never again see the days when petrol was at half the price that it's at now. Not with China growing into an economic powerhouse.. China will eventually blow out the demand for crude oil, and in turn will drive the price of crude oil, and petrol, ever higher.

Stop hitting the Saudi's about expensive petrol. It's not their fault that they own a monopoly on the worlds oil prices.. I mean, if you were in their position you'd capitalise on it too

(btw, in the link i provided click on "trends" for the explanation)


Posted by NeoPhono on Apr-20-2004 11:06:

Here's the "meat" of the article I posted earlier. From the Washington Post.

quote:
But the doomsayers are all wrong. First, gasoline prices are still historically cheap. Gas at $2 a gallon seems expensive, but we need to adjust for inflation to determine whether today's price is out of line with past pump prices.

When energy and gas prices are measured correctly, we find that, although the price has risen than 20 percent in recent weeks, gasoline remains affordable in historical terms. The current "record high" price is quite moderate by historical standards. And in real terms, we had higher retail gasoline prices as recently as 1985, and significantly higher prices from 1979 to the mid-1980s.

Winston Churchill once said that to see the future, you have to understand the past. Let's look at the long-term trend on gas prices. Gasoline pump prices have been steadily declining since the 1920s, with the obvious exception of the 1970s, when we faced an OPEC embargo and gasoline lines.

In 1920, the real price of gas (excluding taxes) was twice today's. If today's price of gasoline relative to wages were comparable to 1920, we would pay nearly $10 a gallon.

The same is true, by the way, for the cost of oil -- slightly cheaper today, adjusted for wage growth, than 50 years ago and 5 times cheaper than 100 years ago: Human innovation always finds new oil sources and technology cuts drilling costs.


Posted by St_Andrew on Apr-20-2004 13:21:

quote:
Originally posted by xKaoSx
you fucking idiot-
you must be 15 and dont own a car.
Gas prices here are $2.30/g

You dont think that is high?

WHY would gas in one part of the country be $1.60 and in cali be that much higher?


fyi, gas in europe costs about $5/g

that is high, but it's good for the envioronment


Posted by xKaoSx on Apr-20-2004 13:25:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
fyi, gas in europe costs about $5/g

that is high, but it's good for the envioronment


And how long is your commute everyday to work?

I drive about 25 miles each way.


Posted by St_Andrew on Apr-20-2004 13:31:

quote:
Originally posted by xKaoSx
And how long is your commute everyday to work?

I drive about 25 miles each way.


hmm about 10 minutes walk (to school)

but the point with high gas prices is that you are more willing to:
- Get a better car which consume less gasonline
- Use the public transport system instead (guess that's hard for you though cause you don't have any )
- Fix a car pool to make the coasts less
- Get a job which is closer to you

Obviously europeans survive, so why shouldn't you?


Posted by BadBadNeil on Apr-20-2004 13:41:

Always funny that people bring up that prices are lower in other countries. Well too bad. We aren't other countries.

This country is based on commuting. We probably do it more than any other country in the world, thereofore a larger percentage of our income goes to gas than other countries. Also it doesn't help that the job economy isn't doing great and is on a rebound with many people out of work and raises to compensate for inflation non existant in many job environments. Therefore if you are making the same or less money that you were last year but gas keeps increasing then its not really adjusting based on salary inflation but yearly inflation.


Someone mentioned Saudi Arabia supports Al-Quaia. They support wahabism (sp) which is an extremist type of religion but they don't support Al Quaida because Al Quaida wants to overthrow the Saudi Government.


Posted by Shakka on Apr-20-2004 13:55:

Gas in America is certainly expensive right now, but most people just don't seem to recognize the inflation side of the equation. Also, a lot of people on this board are pretty young and don't remember gas prices in the 70's when things were really bad. With inflation factored in, comparing gas prices today with historical prices, on an apples to apples basis, shows that gas prices today are still FAR lower on a relative basis vs. historical prices. However, prices are still high, and they've gone up rather rapidly, so the change in prices is felt in the wallet all the more.

FYI, gas prices in the US are extremely cheap vs. global prices. However, if you want the cheapest gas in the world, I'd check with Kuwait and Venezuela. I read a couple of weeks ago that gas prices in Venezuela are about $0.14/gallon. How does that make you feel?!

I have to agree with NeoPhono on the issue of drilling, however. There has not been a major new refinery built in the U.S. in over 20 years, in large part due to environmentalists and political hurdles. We have a strategic petroleum reserve (which I don't think we should be using), and the ANWR, which we SHOULD be drilling if prices are so much of a public concern. I have to agree--Kerry loves to point out things he sees as problematic, but doesn't offer a concrete, logical solution to any of it.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.